Page 228 - IJB-10-3
P. 228

International Journal of Bioprinting                        Preparation and characterization of branched NGCs




            the two pathways. 54,55  To eliminate the influence of   on the branched nerves (B1 and B2) (Figure 2d).
            different  nerve  stumps,  a  linear  sciatic  nerve  defect   Unexpectedly, there were no significant differences in
            model was established in this study, creating a single   electrophysiological function among the trunk and
            microenvironment induced by a single injured distal   branches, specifically B1 and B2. The result hinted that
            stump for nerve regeneration.                      the branched nerves within dual-branched channels
               At the 16-week postoperative mark, the functional   exhibit comparable electrophysiological conduction.
            recovery of the implanted sites and NGCs was evaluated.   Our findings suggested that branch angles did not
            The distal and proximal stumps of the injured nerves   significantly impact nerve regeneration within DBN
            were successfully reconnected in all groups (Figure 2b),   when the branched conduits were implanted to bridge
            and nerve regeneration along the branched channels with   linear sciatic nerve gaps. Furthermore, we assessed the
            various angles was observed in all DBNs. In the DBNs   gastrocnemius muscle’s relative wet weight ratios (i.e., the
            with a branch angle of 120°, a segment of the regenerated   weight of the right side divided by that of the left side).
            nerves even displayed an elongating direction that   The results showed no significant differences among
            was reversed to the distal stumps to a certain degree   DBN groups (Figure 2e–f). Histological analysis of
            (Figure S5  in  Supplementary File). Electrophysiology   gastrocnemius muscle cross-sections was also performed.
            examinations were performed to assess the physiological   The mean diameters of muscle fibers were similar among
            functions of the regenerated nerves. As shown in Figure   all the branched NGC groups (Figure 3g; Figure S7 in
            2c, no significant difference was observed in NCV and   Supplementary File). These results were consistent with
            CMAP latency among all DBN groups. However, the    electrophysiology assessments.
            peak amplitude of CMAP in the sham group exhibited    The regenerated branched nerves, bifurcating from the
            a significantly lower value than that of the DBN groups.   proximal stump and converging toward the distal stumps,
            The recovery of CMAP amplitude indirectly reflects   were  observed  (Figure  3a).  Histological  examination
            the number of regenerated motor nerve fibers, while   through H&E staining confirmed the regenerated nerves,
            a reduced level of CMAP amplitude may suggest the   showcasing the presence of newly formed capillaries
            incomplete innervation of target  tissues. 56,57  Besides,   (Figure 3b). Concurrently, LFB staining of myelin
            the electrophysiological assessment was also performed   sheaths served to further validate the remyelination

































            Figure 3. Histological analysis of nerves in DBNs. (a) Representative photographs of the fixed nerves with DBNs (scale bar = 5 mm). (b) H&E staining
            (scale bar = 500 μm) and (c) LFB staining of the regenerated nerve tissues in conduits (scale bar = 200 μm). (d) H&E staining and LFB staining of the
            longitudinal section of the regenerated branched nerves in DBNs (120°) (scale bar = 1 mm). (e) H&E staining of the regenerated branched nerves (B1,
            B2) (scale bar = 200 μm). (f) The relative cross-section area ratio of regenerated branched nerves. (g) The diameter of muscle fibers. Abbreviations: DBN:
            dual-branched NGC; H&E: hematoxylin and eosin; LFB: luxol fast blue.

            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       220                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.1750
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233