Page 33 - IJB-4-1
        P. 33
     Fan Liu, et al.
              artcartbiomech.pdf                                  org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.032
           124. Lee C H, Rodeo S A, Fortier L A, et al., 2014, Protein-  133. Lee W, Debasitis J C, Lee V K, et al., 2009, Multi-layered
              releasing polymeric scaffolds induce fibrochondrocytic   culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through
              differentiation of endogenous cells for knee meniscus   three-dimensional freeform fabrication. Biomaterials, 30(8):
              regeneration in sheep. Sci Transl Med, 6(266): 266ra171.   1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.009
              https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3009696     134. Michael S, Sorg H, Peck C T, et al., 2013, Tissue engineered
           125. Kundu J, Shim J H, Jang J, et al., 2015, An additive   skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form
              manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted   skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice.
              scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Reg   PLoS ONE, 8(3): e57741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
              Med, 9(11): 1286–1297. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1682  pone.0057741
           126. Hung K C, Tseng C S, Dai L G, et al., 2016, Water-based   135. Huang H, Sharma H S, 2013, Neurorestoratology: One of the
              polyurethane 3D printed scaffolds with controlled release function   most promising new disciplines at the forefront of neuroscience
              for customized cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 83: 156–  and medicine. J Neurorestoratology, 2013(default): 37–41.
              168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.        https://doi.org/10.2147/JN.S47592
           127. Park J H, Hong J M, Ju Y M, et al., 2015, A novel tissue-  136. Zhou X, Wang X, 2015, Skin Substitute Manufacturing, in:
              engineered trachea with a mechanical behavior similar   Organ Manufacturing, X Wang ed, Nova Science Publishers
              to native trachea. Biomaterials, 62: 106–115. https://doi.  Inc, New York, 385–408. http://www.cartilagehealth.com/
              org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.008              images/artcartbiomech.pdf
           128. Mak H C, 2011, Trends in computational biology–2010. Nat   137. Pourchet L J, Thepot A, Albouy M, et al., 2016, Human skin
              Biotechnol, 29(1): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0111–45b   3D bioprinting using scaffold-free approach. Adv Healthc
           129. Ng W L, Wang S, Yeong W Y, et al., 2016, Skin bioprinting:   Mater, 6(4). https://doi.org/ 10.1002/adhm.201601101
              Impending reality or fantasy? Trends in Biotechnology, 34(9):   138. Lu C P, Polak L, Rocha A S, et al., 2012, Identification of
              689–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.006  stem cell populations in sweat glands and ducts reveals roles
           130. Lee V, Singh G, Trasatti J P, et al., 2014, Design and   in homeostasis and wound repair. Cell, 150(1): 136–150.
              fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.045
              Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 20(6): 473–484. https://doi.  139. Liu N, Huang S, Yao B, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinting matrices
              org/10.1089/ten                                     with controlled pore structure and release function guide in
           131. Ringeisen B R, Othon C M, Barron J A, et al., 2006, Jet-  vitro self-organization of sweat gland. Sci Rep, 6: 34410.
              based methods to print living cells. Biotechnol J, 1(9): 930–  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34410
              948. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200600058      140. Huang S, Yao B, Xie J, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinted extracellular
           132. Saunders R E, Gough J E, Derby B, 2008, Delivery of   matrix mimics facilitate directed differentiation of epithelial
              human fibroblast cells by piezoelectric drop-on-demand   progenitors for sweat gland regeneration. Acta Biomater, 32:
              inkjet printing. Biomaterials, 29(2): 193–203. https://doi.  170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.039
                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 1        15
     	
