Page 117 - IJB-10-4
P. 117

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Bioprinting hearing loss treatment




































            Figure 3. Progression of bioprinting repair in tympanic membrane perforation. Abbreviations: bFGF: Basic fibroblast growth factor; hUCS: Human cord
            serum; MSC: Mesenchymal stem cell; PCL: polycaprolactone.



            laboratory and clinical settings, enables the customization   Watson et al. conducted a study involving three
            of patient-specific ossicular chains. This technology is   patients who experienced unilateral ear loss, in which
            particularly beneficial during ossiculoplasty procedures.   auricular prostheses and polycaprolactone were employed,
            The ideal ossicular chain should conform to the patient-  resulting in increased self-assurance among the patients
            specific defect and possess outstanding long-term stability,   and showcasing the  efficacy and practicality of ear
            good acoustic properties, and low implantation difficulty.   reconstruction through the application of 3D printing
            In line with previous studies, MSCs printed in gelatin   technology.  Kozin et al. conducted a successful test on a
                                                                        60
            methacrylate (GelMA) and alginate, or in carboxylated   custom-made, fixed-length 3D-printed prosthesis designed
            agarose  hydrogels,  are  frequently  implanted  into the   for the repair of bony superior canal defects on cadaveric
            body to stimulate endochondral ossification and cartilage   temporal bones. The utilization of such personalized
            neovascularization. 52,53  The utilization of 3D-bioprinted   prostheses has the potential to address surgical challenges
            personalized  ossicular  chains  obviates  the necessity  for   associated with inadequate superior canal dehiscence
            intraoperative estimation, resulting in a notable reduction   (SCD) repair and mechanical damage to the membranous
            in surgical duration and regulation of intraoperative   labyrinth, ultimately reducing the likelihood of hearing loss
            hemorrhage. 54,55  Despite progress in endoprosthetic   and vestibular lesions while enhancing surgical outcomes.
                                                                                                            61
            materials,  surgical  methodologies,  and  surgical  Additionally, in 2016, Kuru et al. developed the first life-
            magnification instruments, the occurrence of ossicular   sized 3D-printed ear model featuring tympanic membranes
            chain reconstruction (OCR) failure frequently manifests   and ear ossicles, utilizing micro-computed tomography
            within a 2.5-year timeframe. Consequently, there remains   (micro-CT) scanning and silicone rubber materials.  In
                                                                                                          62
            a critical exigency for enhanced interventions to mitigate   the initial phase of their study, Eisenman et al. conducted
            implantation risks, decrease procedural complications,   surgical training by excising auditory ossicles from the
            and extend the efficacy of surgical interventions. 56,57  The   middle ear. Subsequently, three cadaveric specimens
            efficacy of OCR is heavily contingent upon the appropriate   underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning, leading
            selection of the auditory ossicles prosthesis and the   to the production of ossicular prostheses through 3D
            surgical methodology utilized, with considerations such   printing. Despite the successful implantation of these
            as the shape, flexibility, and length of the prosthesis being   prostheses into the temporal bone matrix with middle
            particularly influential. 58,59                    ear defects, by four surgeons, showcasing the precision of


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       109                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3497
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122