Page 114 - IJB-10-4
P. 114

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Bioprinting hearing loss treatment








































                Figure 1. Technical workflow for manufacturing 3D-bioprinted human organs and comparison of mainstream 3D bioprinting technologies.


            applications in  addressing hearing  impairment,   2.1. Microtia/anotia
            encompassing conductive deafness attributed to     Microtia/anotia, a congenital developmental deformity of
            microtia  or  anotia,  tympanic  membrane  perforation   the auricle, has a significant impact on the psychological
            (TMP), ossicular chain deformities, and sensorineural   well-being of affected children and can lead to aural
            deafness arising from sudden deafness (SD) or enduring   atresia, impairing hearing, and potentially causing facial
            neurological disorders.                            nerve palsy in severe cases. The incidence of microtia/
                                                               anotia, in neonates is approximately 0.03%,  with surgical
                                                                                                 29
            2. Bioprinting applications in conductive          treatment being the primary clinical approach. Presently,
            hearing loss                                       autologous rib cartilage grafts and Medpor auricular
                                                               scaffold implantation are regarded as the most efficacious
            The field of 3D bioprinting shows great promise in the   techniques. Nevertheless, the utilization of these
            realms of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine,   prosthetics is associated with potential complications.  For
                                                                                                         30
            largely owing to its ability to precisely regulate tissue   instance, individuals undergoing costal cartilage implants
            regeneration.  Extensive investigation has been    frequently encounter local pain and infection at the donor
                       27
            conducted on the application of bioprinting for the   site, which may subsequently impact thoracic development
            management of microtia/anotia, leading to the successful   and respiratory capacity in pediatric patients.  Moreover,
                                                                                                   31
            production of 3D-printed auricular scaffolds, bionic ears,   despite the advantageous porous structure and rapid
            and ear models.  Moreover, bioprinting techniques have   vascularization of Medpor auricular scaffolds, the
                         28
            the capacity to generate both typical and atypical ear   material’s stiffness and lack of stress resistance, as well as
            tissues, closely mimicking the physiological conditions   susceptibility to infection in external components, have
            observed in the broader populace or in individuals with   been identified as limitations. 32,33
            particular medical conditions. These artificial constructs,
            such as the ossicular chain, tympanic membrane, and   The emergence of 3D bioprinting technology offers
            tympanic cavity, can be employed for surgical training,   the  potential to  create  innovative  auricular scaffolds
            diagnostic procedures, and the evaluation of new   that closely replicate the morphological, functional, and
            pharmaceuticals, among other potential uses.       histological characteristics of native auricular cartilage


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       106                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3497
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119