Page 126 - IJB-10-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting hearing loss treatment

44. Chen Y, Zhang J, Liu X, et al. Noninvasive in vivo 3D 55. Li C, Yang M, Xie Y, et al. Application of the polystyrene
bioprinting. Sci Adv. 2020;6(23):eaba7406. model made by 3-D printing rapid prototyping technology
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7406 for operation planning in revision lumbar discectomy. J
Orthop Sci. 2015;20(3):475-480.
45. Della Volpe A, Ippolito V, Pastore V, et al. Use of a 3D
reconstruction model in a patient with severe atresia auris doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0706-8
for optimal placement of Bonebridge transcutaneous 56. Heikkinen AK, Lähde S, Rissanen V, et al. Feasibility of
bone conduction implant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 3D-printed middle ear prostheses in partial ossicular chain
2021;278(9):3559-3564. reconstruction. Int J Bioprint. 2023;9(4):727.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06528-0 doi: 10.18063/ijb.727
46. Hu H, Chen J, Li S, Xu T, Li Y. 3D printing technology and 57. Wood CB, Yawn R, Lowery AS, O’Connell BP, Haynes
applied materials in eardrum regeneration. J Biomater Sci D, Wanna GB. Long-term hearing outcomes following
Polym Ed. 2023;34(7):950-985. total ossicular reconstruction with titanium prostheses.
doi: 10.1080/09205063.2022.2147350 Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(1);123-129.
doi: 10.1177/0194599819831284
47. Maharajan N, Cho GW, Jang CH. Application of
mesenchymal stem cell for tympanic membrane 58. Yung M. Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for
regeneration by tissue engineering approach. Int J Pediatr surgical failure. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27(1):20-26.
Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;133:109969. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000176173.94764.f5
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109969 59. Kaftan H, Bohme A, Martin H. Geometric parameters of
48. Jang CH, Ahn S, Lee JW, Lee BH, Lee H, Kim G. Mesenchymal the ossicular chain as a function of its integrity: a micro-
stem cell-laden hybrid scaffold for regenerating subacute CT study in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol.
tympanic membrane perforation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater 2015;36(1):178-183.
Biol Appl. 2017;72:456-463. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000315
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.094 60. Watson J, Hatamleh MM. Complete integration of
49. Kuo CY, Wilson E, Fuson A, et al. Repair of tympanic technology for improved reproduction of auricular
membrane perforations with customized bioprinted prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(5):430-436.
ear grafts using Chinchilla models. Tissue Eng Part A. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.018
2018;24(5–6):527-535. 61. Kozin ED, Remenschneider AK, Cheng S, Nakajima HH,
doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2017.0246 Lee DJ. Three-dimensional printed prosthesis for repair
50. Jang CH, Kim W, Moon C, Kim G. Bioprinted collagen- of superior canal dehiscence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
based cell-laden scaffold with growth factors for tympanic 2015;153(4):616-619.
membrane regeneration in chronic perforation model. IEEE doi: 10.1177/0194599815592602
Trans Nanobioscience. 2022;21(3):370-379. 62. Kuru I, Maier H, Muller M, Lenarz T, Lueth TC. A 3D-printed
doi: 10.1109/TNB.2021.3085599 functioning anatomical human middle ear model. Hear Res.
51. Luers JC, Huttenbrink KB. Surgical anatomy and pathology 2016;340:204-213.
of the middle ear. J Anat. 2016;228(2):338-353. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.025
doi: 10.1111/joa.12389 63. Hirsch JD, Vincent RL, Eisenman DJ. Surgical reconstruction
52. Gu Y, Pigeot S, Ahrens L, et al. Toward 3D bioprinting of of the ossicular chain with custom 3D printed ossicular
osseous tissue of predefined shape using single-matrix prosthesis. 3D Print Med. 2017;3(1):7.
cell-bioink constructs. Adv Healthc Mater. 2003;12(9): doi: 10.1186/s41205-017-0015-2
e2202550. 64. Dalchow CV, Grun D, Stupp HF. Reconstruction of the
doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202550 ossicular chain with titanium implants. Otolaryngol Head
53. Forget A, Gianni-Barrera R, Uccelli A, et al. Mechanically Neck Surg. 2001;125(6):628-630.
defined microenvironment promotes stabilization of doi: 10.1067/mhn.2001.120397
microvasculature, which correlates with the enrichment 65. Hillman TA, Shelton C. Ossicular chain reconstruction:
of a novel Piezo-1(+) population of circulating CD11b(+)/ titanium versus plastipore. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(10):
CD115(+) monocytes. Adv Mater. 2019;31(21):e1808050. 1731-1735.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201808050 doi: 10.1097/00005537-200310000-00013
54. Lethaus B, Poort L, Böckmann R, et al. Additive 66. He H, Li D, Lin Z, et al. Temperature-programmable and
manufacturing for microvascular reconstruction of enzymatically solidifiable gelatin-based bioinks enable
the mandible in 20 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. facile extrusion bioprinting. Biofabrication. 2020;12(4):
2012;40(1):43-46. 045003.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.01.007 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab9906

Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 118 doi: 10.36922/ijb.3497