Page 128 - IJB-10-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting hearing loss treatment

conductive hearing loss: a feasibility study. J Int Adv Otol. 105. Merlo A, Mokkapati V, Pandit S, Mijakovic I. Boron nitride
2020;16(2):222-226. nanomaterials: biocompatibility and bio-applications.
doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.5883 Biomater Sci. 2018;6(9):2298-2311.
doi: 10.1039/c8bm00516h
93. Emerman AB, Zhang ZR, Chakrabarti O, Hegde RS.
Compartment-restricted biotinylation reveals novel 106. Kus-Liskiewicz M, Fickers P, Ben Tahar I. Biocompatibility
features of prion protein metabolism in vivo. Mol Biol Cell. and cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles: recent advances
2010;21(24):4325-4337. in methodologies and regulations. Int J Mol Sci.
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-09-0742 2021;22(20):10952.
94. McMillan A, McMillan N, Gupta N, Kanotra SP, Salem AK. doi: 10.3390/ijms222010952
3D bioprinting in otolaryngology: a review. Adv Healthc 107. Adabi M, Naghibzadeh M, Adabi M, et al. Biocompatibility
Mater. 2023;12(19): e2203268. and nanostructured materials: applications in nanomedicine.
doi: 10.1002/adhm.202203268 Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45(4):833-842.
95. Dodziuk H. Applications of 3D printing in healthcare. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2016.1178134
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016;13(3):283-293. 108. Naz S, Gul A, Zia M, Javed R. Synthesis, biomedical
doi: 10.5114/kitp.2016.62625 applications, and toxicity of CuO nanoparticles. Appl
96. Johansson M, Asp F, Berninger E. Children with congenital Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;107(4): 1039-1061.
unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: effects of late hearing doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12364-z
aid amplification-a pilot study. Ear Hear. 2020;41:55-66. 109. Przygoda RT. Safety assessment and global regulatory
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000730 requirements for genetic toxicity evaluations of medical
97. Johnstone PM, Yeager KR, Noss E. Spatial hearing in a child devices. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017; 58(5):375-379.
with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral doi: 10.1002/em.22102
cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(6):400-408. 110. Ali Zahid A, Chakraborty A, Shamiya Y, Ravi SP, Paul A.
doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.779755 Leveraging the advancements in functional biomaterials
98. Jorgensen AM, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Solid organ bioprinting: and scaffold fabrication technologies for chronic wound
strategies to achieve organ function. Chem Rev. healing applications. Mater Horiz. 2022;9(7):1850-1865.
2020;120(19):11093-11127. doi: 10.1039/d2mh00115b
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00145 111. Delalat B, Harding F, Gundsambuu B, et al. 3D printed
99. Naghieh S, Lindberg G, Tamaddon M, Liu C. Biofabrication lattices as an activation and expansion platform for T cell
strategies for musculoskeletal disorders: evolution therapy. Biomaterials. 2017;140:58-68.
towards clinical applications. Bioengineering (Basel). 2021; doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.009
8(9):123. 112. Lindner N, Blaeser A. Scalable biofabrication: a perspective
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8090123 on the current state and future potentials of process
100. Langridge B, Griffin M, Butler PE. Regenerative medicine for automation in 3D-bioprinting applications. Front Bioeng
skeletal muscle loss: a review of current tissue engineering Biotechnol. 2022;10:855042.
approaches. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021;32(1):15. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.855042
doi: 10.1007/s10856-020-06476-5 113. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al. Vat polymerization-based
101. Shah Mohammadi M, Buchen JT, Pasquina PF, et al. Critical bioprinting-process, materials, applications and regulatory
considerations for regeneration of vascularized composite challenges. Biofabrication. 2020;12(2):022001.
tissues. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2021;27(4):366-381. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0223 114. Chan WW, Yu F, Le QB, et al. Towards biomanufacturing of
102. Jain P, Kathuria H, Dubey N. Advances in 3D bioprinting cell-derived matrices. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11929.
of tissues/organs for regenerative medicine and in-vitro doi: 10.3390/ijms222111929
models. Biomaterials. 2022;287:121639. 115. Murphy SV, De Coppi P, Atala A. Opportunities and
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121639
challenges of translational 3D bioprinting. Nat Biomed Eng.
103. Goddard E, Dodds S. Ethics and policy for bioprinting. 2020;4:370-380.
Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2140:43-64. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0471-7
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0520-2_4
116. Bai J, Ge G, Wang Q, et al. Engineering stem cell recruitment
104. Ivanovski S, Breik O, Carluccio D, et al. 3D printing for bone and osteoinduction via bioadhesive molecular mimics to
regeneration: challenges and opportunities for achieving improve osteoporotic bone-implant integration. Research
predictability. Periodontol. 2000;93(1):358-384. (Wash D C). 2022;2022:9823784.
doi: 10.1111/prd.12525 doi: 10.34133/2022/9823784

Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024) 120 doi: 10.36922/ijb.3497