Page 248 - IJB-10-4
P. 248

International Journal of Bioprinting                                   Cell viability in printing structured inks




            controlled  ink  distribution.  This  is  due  to  the  fact  that,   structured inks (parameters such as geometric features,
            in addition to controlling nozzle size, the distribution   viscosity, density, and cell distribution) that considers cell
            of cells within the structured inks can also be regulated.   viability was  presented. We also conducted experiments
            When printing, conventionally, a lower print speed may be   utilizing vascular-like ink-based printing as an example to
            needed for smaller nozzles to ensure material deposition   examine cell viability, whose performance was compared
            and solidification, which should be acknowledged.    to conventional printing.
                                                         32
            Computer-aided design was employed as an effective
            method for modeling structured inks. Computational   2. Materials and methods
            fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was used to provide
            insights into the advantages of structured inks and further   2.1. Hypothesis establishment for enhanced
            considerations for cell viability in structured ink design, as   cell viability
            it is a powerful tool  for fluid analysis and material design.   Our research into cell viability was rooted in a novel E3DP
                           33
            Biocompatible hydrogels involving alginate and gelatin   technique employing specialized structured inks, which
            with parameters (viscosity, density, and printing speed),   diverge from conventional printing materials due to their
            as reported in a previous work,  were selected as input   non-uniform composition. These inks were formulated to
                                      30
            parameters for simulation. Considering the distribution   possess specific cross-sectional features, achieved through
            of cells in the structured inks, the analysis  focused on   mold-assisted fabrication. Once prepared, they were loaded
            representative fluid forces experienced by cells during the   into their corresponding ink cartridges and subsequently
            printing process, including pressure, wall shear stress, and   extruded using a single piston drive. This process enables
            shear stress at material phase interfaces.         the direct construction of diverse fiber structures without
               Herein, cell viability was taken into consideration for   the necessity for multiple nozzles. It is important to
            E3DP, with an emphasis on the comparative and equivalent   highlight that a conventional method, involving the use
            analysis of fluid forces based on structured inks (Figure   of multiple printheads, can also fabricate structures with
            1B). These forces were characterized via CFD simulations.   similar or identical characteristics when nozzle sizes
            Input parameters included ink properties, such as viscosity,   are  carefully  chosen.  We  consider  nozzle  size  and inlet
            density, and corresponding velocity vectors. Output   velocity to be crucial factors influencing cell viability.
            parameters involved average and maximum pressure, and   These parameters were determined by considering the
            average and maximum shear stress. Additionally, both 18G   manufacturing process and targeting the construction of
            needle and their corresponding needles were respectively   structures with identical features. Notably, smaller nozzle
            employed in the methods involving structured ink-based   sizes in conventional printing, as compared to structured
            printing and conventional E3DP to fabricate structures   inks, may expose cells to increased fluid forces due to the
            with identical characteristics (Figure 1C).        reduced outlet  cross-sectional diameter.  In research,  the
                                                               deliberate design of heterogeneous structures is essential in
               Thorough analysis of fluid forces was performed using   determining parameters for structured ink-based printing
            simple 2-symmetric and 4-symmetric inks, revealing   and conventional printing, including material selection,
            significant reductions in fluid pressure and shear stress   nozzle size, and inlet velocity. Quantitative analyses of fluid
            compared to conventional printing when considering   forces experienced by cells are thereby achieved.
            E3DP processes. Furthermore, comprehensive comparative
            analyses were conducted to validate the advantages in   2.2. Holistic research design
            biofabrication by comparing the fluid forces in the two   A systematic investigation was conducted to quantitatively
            approaches for constructing essential and widely studied   analyze fluid forces acting on cells during the printing
            vascular-like  and  hepatic  lobule  analogue-like  tissue   processes, aimed at improving cell viability. The research
            structures, as shown in  Figure 1D. Due to the complex   methodology  was  devised  through  CFD  simulations,
            processes of structured ink preparation, to circumvent   considering the modeling of structured inks, boundary
            cell death, equivalent analyses of structured inks based   conditions, and measurement steps. Structured ink
            on fluid forces experienced by cells were conducted to   modeling was implemented by considering the feasibility
            ascertain the corresponding equivalent homogeneous ink   of  constructing  heterogeneous  structures  with  identical
            properties for the purpose of subsequent pre-experimental   features, achieved through 3D printing of structured inks
            validation (Figure 1E). Commonly used symmetric and   and conventional printing. The feasibility of nozzle sizes
            core–shell inks were used as cases for equivalent analysis,   used for comparison (18G needles for structured ink-based
            which revealed a positive correlation between equivalent   printing, 27G and 32G needles for conventional printing,
            homogeneous ink viscosity and shear stress within a   respectively) was analyzed  by analyzing the effect of
            certain range. On that basis, a workflow for designing   structured inks with different cross-sections on the material


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       240                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2362
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253