Page 244 - IJB-10-4
P. 244

International Journal of Bioprinting                               N-PLN hydrogels for human skin modeling




               pullulans and its  characterization.  Carbohydr Polym.   scaffolds with controlled architecture and stiffness modulate
               2019;223:115103.                                   the fibroblast phenotype towards dermal regeneration.
               doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115103                 Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(15):2510.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/polym13152510
            37.  Knight CG, Willenbrock F, Murphy G. A novel coumarin-
               labelled peptide for sensitive continuous assays of the matrix   49.  Raub CB, Putnam AJ, Tromberg BJ, George SC. Predicting
               metalloproteinases. FEBS Lett. 1992;296(3):263-266.  bulk mechanical properties of cellularized collagen gels
               doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80300-6                  using multiphoton microscopy. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(12):
                                                                  4657-4665.
            38.  Holback H, Yeo Y, Park K. Hydrogel swelling behavior and      doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.004
               its biomedical applications. Biomed Hydrogels. 2011;1:3-24.
               doi: 10.1533/9780857091383.1.3                  50.  Weng T, Zhang W, Xia Y, et al. 3D bioprinting for skin tissue
                                                                  engineering: current status and perspectives. J Tissue Eng.
            39.  Chyzy A, Plonska-Brzezinska ME. Hydrogel properties   2021;12:204173142110285.
               and their impact on regenerative medicine and tissue      doi: 10.1177/20417314211028574
               engineering. Molecules. 2020;25(24):5795.
               doi: 10.3390/molecules25245795                  51.  Tahri S, Maarof M, Masri S, Che Man R, Masmoudi H, Fauzi
                                                                  MB.  Human  epidermal keratinocytes  and  human  dermal
            40.  Suhaeri  M,  Noh  MH,  Moon JH,  et  al.  Novel  skin  patch   fibroblasts interactions seeded on gelatin hydrogel for future
               combining  human  fibroblast-derived  matrix  and  application in skin in vitro 3-dimensional model.  Front
               ciprofloxacin for infected wound healing.  Theranostics.   Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1200618.
               2018;8(18):5025-5038.                              doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1200618
               doi: 10.7150/thno.26837
                                                               52.  Bott K, Upton Z, Schrobback K, et al. The effect of matrix
            41.  Wu DQ, Zhu J, Han H, et al. Synthesis and characterization   characteristics on fibroblast proliferation in 3D gels.
               of arginine-NIPAAm hybrid hydrogel as wound dressing: in   Biomaterials. 2010;31(32):8454-8464.
               vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomater. 2018;65:305-316.     doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.046
               doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.048
                                                               53.  Feng Z, Li J, Zhou D, Song H, Lv J, Bai W. A novel
            42.  Peppas NA, Bures P, Leobandung W, Ichikawa H. Hydrogels   photocurable pullulan-based bioink for digital light
               in pharmaceutical formulations.  Eur J Pharm Biopharm.   processing 3D printing. Int J Bioprint. 2022;9(2):104-117.
               2000;50(1):27-46.                                  doi: 10.18063/ijb.v9i2.657
               doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00090-4
                                                               54.  Boelsma E, Verhoeven MCH, Ponec M. Reconstruction of a
            43.  Lai VK, Nedrelow DS, Lake SP, et al. Swelling of collagen-  human skin equivalent using a spontaneously transformed
               hyaluronic acid co-gels: an in vitro residual stress model.   keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT).  J  Invest  Dermatol.
               Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(10):2984-2993.             1999;112(4):489-498.
               doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1636-0                     doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00545.x
            44.  Bachmann B, Spitz S, Schädl B, et al. Stiffness matters:   55.  Schoop VM, Fusenig NE, Mirancea N. Epidermal
               fine-tuned  hydrogel  elasticity  alters  chondrogenic  organization and differentiation of HaCaT keratinocytes
               redifferentiation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:373.  in organotypic coculture with human dermal fibroblasts. J
               doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00373                      Invest Dermatol. 1999;112(3):343-353.
            45.  Ahearne M, Yang Y, El Haj AJ, Then KY, Liu KK.      doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00524.x
               Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of thin hydrogel-  56.  Maas-Szabowski N, Stärker A, Fusenig NE. Epidermal tissue
               based constructs for tissue engineering applications. J R Soc   regeneration and stromal interaction in HaCaT cells is
               Interface. 2005;2(5):455-463.                      initiated by TGF-α. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 14):2937-2948.
               doi: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0065                        doi: 10.1242/jcs.00474
            46.  Orwin EJ, Borene ML, Hubel A. Biomechanical and optical   57.  Wilson VG. Growth and differentiation of HaCaT
               characteristics of a corneal stromal equivalent.  J Biomech   keratinocytes. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1195:33-41.
               Eng. 2003;125(4):439-444.                          doi: 10.1007/7651_2013_42
               doi: 10.1115/1.1589773
                                                               58.  Zhao X, Lang Q, Yildirimer L, et al. Photocrosslinkable
            47.  Awad HA, Quinn Wickham M, Leddy HA, Gimble JM,   gelatin hydrogel for epidermal tissue engineering.  Adv
               Guilak F. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived   Healthc Mater. 2016;5(1):108-118.
               adult stem cells in agarose, alginate, and gelatin scaffolds.      doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500005
               Biomaterials. 2004;25(16):3211-3222.            59.  Meyle J, Guttig K, Rascher G, Wolburg H. Transepithelial
               doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.045
                                                                  electrical resistance and tight junctions of human gingival
            48.  R. Ibañez RI, do Amaral RJFC, Reis RL, Marques AP,   keratinocvtes. J Periodontal Res. 1999;34(4):214-222.
               Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ. 3D-printed gelatin methacrylate      doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1999.tb02244.x



            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       236                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3395
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249