Page 9 - IJB-5-2
P. 9

Zhang, et al.
           an 8% reduction in surgery time for tumor patients (mean   cord compression, requiring surgical decompression and
           46 min per case) and 22% reduction in the deformity cases   stabilization.  Preoperatively, the patient  had posterior-
           (mean 68 min per case) which directly reduced the cost of   anterior  (PA) and lateral  (LAT) cervical  and  full  spine
           surgery in addition to the other reported benefits. Reasons   radiographs  (Figure  1), brain  and full  spine MRI
           given for the reduction in surgical time were included:   (Figure 2), and 3D CT scans (Figure 3). The CT scan was
           easier,  accurate  and  more  efficient  implant  and  screw   used to create a 3D anatomic biomodel (Figure 4).
           positioning;  less frequent  reference  to  other  imaging   After viewing the available  imaging data, the initial
           resources and reduced number of instrumentations due to   surgical  plan was to perform a posterior instrumented
           better anatomic visualization; and detailed pre-operative   fusion  from  occiput  to T4  with  screw  fixation  into  the
           planning. A recent systematic review paper by Martelli   occiput  and thoracic  spine only. Due to the  small  size
           et al.  based on 52 papers reported that  time  was   and deformity of the cervical vertebrae, it was considered
               [10]
           saved due to additive manufacturing. Likewise, Mao et   that  the  upper  cervical  vertebrae  were  too  small  to  be
           al.  also confirmed that 3D biomodels were helpful in   able to insert any fixation points for the planned posterior
             [8]
           improving pre-operative planning and surgical treatment   construct.  After receiving  the biomodel,  it became
           of  complex  severe  spinal  deformities  compared  with   evident  that  the  C2  laminae  were  of  sufficient  size
           either CT or MRI 3D spinal reconstructions. This paper   for small translaminar screws to be used on each side.
           suggested that the biomodels were a superior visual aid   The  surgical  instrumentation  was changed  to include
           when confirming the position of an anatomic landmark,   these  translaminar  screws  in  addition  to  the  fixation
           helped the surgeon plan the surgery, facilitated the choice   points  already  planned  at  the  occiput  and  T3-4  levels.
           of  internal  fixation  instrumentation,  and  improved  the
           accuracy, and therefore, the safety of pedicle screw
           insertion all of which would influence the direct costs of
           the surgical cases and the risk of revision surgery being
           required in the future.
             Another important factor discussed by both Mao et al.
                                                         [8]
           and Izatt et al.  was the use of additively manufactured
                       [5]
           biomodels as a communication tool with both colleagues
           and patients/parents. Patients (or if they were <18 years
           old,  their  parents/guardians)  were  contacted  after  the
           surgery, and all stated that the biomodels improved their
           anatomic understanding of the condition; the procedure
           and the risks associated with it, and, therefore, improved
           their ability to give fully informed consent. Similarly,
           biomodels enabled better communication  and teaching
           within  the surgical  team  both preoperatively  and   Figure 1. Pre-operative lateral and posterior-anterior radiographs
                                                               of the cervical  and upper thoracic spine of 12-year-old male
           intraoperatively. Of course,  there  were  also  limitations   (neurofibromatosis type 1, plexiform neuroma posterior to cervical
           presented in using this technology mainly related to the   spine), which did not provide clear anatomic detail of significant
           extra time, labor, and the associated costs of biomodel   upper cervical deformity.
           manufacture. Nevertheless, it was argued that these issues
           were offset by the  cost savings from  shorter surgical
           times, the reduced complication rates, and the likelihood
           of surgical revision being required in the future [3,5,7] .
             Presented below are two case studies performed by
           the authors of this article where additively manufactured
           biomodels were used for pre-operative planning.

           4.1. Patient A
           A  12  year  old  male,  diagnosed  with  neurofibromatosis
           type 1 with complex occipitocervical spinal deformities
           and a large neuroma in close proximity  to the  upper
           cervical  spine.  The  patient  was demonstrating  steadily   Figure  2. Sagittal slices of pre-operative  magnetic  resonance
           worsening neurological  signs in all limbs and had   imaging showing the reduced size of the spinal canal in the upper
           experienced  a number of episodes of intermittent   cervical  spine  with  insufficient  posterior  element  bony  detail
           quadriparesis indicative of progressive brainstem/spinal   (patient A).

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2019)–Volume 5, Issue 2         5
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14