Page 503 - IJB-10-5
P. 503

International Journal of Bioprinting                  3D bioprinting of full-thickness skin with a rete ridge structure



























































            Figure 3. Histological and immunofluorescence staining analyses of full-thickness skin equivalents (FTSEs). (A) Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining
            results of the rete ridge and conventional FTSEs. Red dotted boxes indicate well-differentiated keratinocytes at the rete ridge structure. Scale bars: 200
            μm. (B) Difference in the interdigitation index between rete ridge and conventional FTSEs. The error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 4). (C)
            Assessment of protein expression in the rete ridge and conventional FTSEs with immunofluorescence staining. High expression of COL17, ITGA6, and
            ITGB1 was observed in rete ridge FTSEs (white dotted box and white arrowhead). A higher expression of Kiel 67 (Ki67) was observed at the end of the rete
            ridge structure (red dotted box). Scale bars: 100 μm.





            K10 was noted in the valleys of the rete ridge FTSE. As for   at a depth exceeding 100 μm, a higher number of Ki67
                                                                                                             +
            Ki67, a discrepancy between rete ridge and conventional   cells were observed in rete ridge FTSEs.
            FTSEs was observed, with a higher number of Ki67+ cells
            being observed in rete ridge FTSEs (Figure 5B). Moreover,   4. Discussion
            analysis based on the depth of the skin model (Figure 5C)   In this study, we explored the fabrication of advanced
                                         +
            revealed a comparable count of Ki67  cells between the flat   skin models that mimic the rete ridge structure of native
            and rete ridge FTSEs at a depth of 100 μm or less. However,   skin, focusing on the discussion and implications of our

            Volume 10 Issue 5 (2024)                       495                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.3961
   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508