Page 25 - IJB-6-2
P. 25

Zolfagharian, et al.
           contribute to landfills. The PLA is used in this study   method, the material is added in the areas in which
           as it has been found to be feasible for the production of   the estimation of the strain energy is too high .
                                                                                                          [39]
           scaffolds with different architectures and controlled
           porosities which are tailored for use as temporary   2.4 Finite element analysis (FEA) and  mesh
           fixtures in biomedical applications [33,34] . In addition,   convergence
           polyvinyl alcohol used as support materials, which   TO  with  the  minimum  compliance  criteria  was
           is  a  water-soluble,  biodegradable  polymer  under   coupled  with  a  structural  analysis  module  in
           both aerobic and anaerobic conditions .             ANSYS  2019  R2  to  evaluate  varying  splint
                                              [35]
           2.3 TO                                              designs.  Since,  the  mechanical  properties  of  the
                                                               3D printed parts are affected by the 3D printing
           TO  is  utilized  here  to  create  a  series  of  splints   parameters,  for  example,  layer  thickness  and
           optimized for the loading conditions. The original   raster width, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio
           splint  will  be  compared  with  the  topology-    of PLA were obtained according to Type I ASTM
           optimized splints in mechanical performance and in   D638  test  standard.  PLA  with  a  density  of  m ,
                                                                                                             3
           thermal qualities that will affect the users’ comfort   Young’s modulus of 2850 MPa, and Poisson’s ratio
           experience.  With  these  processes,  splints  can  be   of 0.25 were defined for the material properties of
           produced with much better mechanical properties     the  splint.  The  maximum  pressure  exerted  was
           requiring less material, for more breathability and   estimated to be 64×10  Pa applied at the rim of the
                                                                                    4
           comfort, while having equal strength. In this study,   splint, and the base was assumed to fix (Figure 5).
           a  splint  is  developed  based  on TO  in  which  the   The domains of 100%, 79.49%, 71.13%, and
           algorithm starts from a solid model of the material.   62.51%  mass  were  discretized  by  unistructural
           Distributed  loading  and  boundary  conditions  are   tetrahedral  elements  with  394,439,  140,904,
           defined  based  on  the  specifications  of  the  splint   104,634,  and  104,026  elements,  respectively,  as
           finger, as shown in Figure 5. The main objective    shown in Figure 6, where higher mesh density was
           here  is  to  remove  the  maximum  material  while   selected for the region of interest and local mesh
           preserving  the  volume  fraction  and  maximum     refinement was conducted to achieve high mesh
           stiffness of the 3D-printed splint [36,37] .        quality. Note that mesh independence studies were
             The  theory  of  the  optimality  criteria  (OC)
           is used in ANSYS Workbench. The OC method           A                      B
           uses  an  estimation  of  the  optimality  conditions
           to  update  the  design  variables  of  each  point .
                                                        [38]
           The designs are updated independently using this







                                                               C                       D












                                                               Figure 6. Domains discretization with tetrahedral
           Figure 5. Schematic view of boundary conditions     elements for (A) 100%, (B) 79.49%, (C) 71.13%,
           on a sample splint design.                          and (D) 62.51% mass.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 2        21
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30