Page 115 - IJB-6-3
P. 115

Parfenov, et al.
           types of 3D  bioprinting technology: (i) Ink-jet    with  this  definition,  it  is  easy  to  demonstrate
           bioprinting,  (ii)  extrusive  bioprinting,  and  (iii)   that many so-called scaffold-free technologies
           laser-based bioprinting such as laser-induced       are scaffold-based.  For example,  (i) based on
           forward transfer (LIFT) . However, in recent        the most cited  paper by Gabor Forgacs’s group
                                   [4]
           reviews,  especially  in  the  market  reports,  new   on  scaffold-free  tissue  engineering,  removable
                                                                                                            [11]
           types of 3D bioprinting – magnetic and acoustic     agarose hydrogel is not considered as a scaffold ;
           bioprinting were also mentioned [5-8] .             (ii) the removable supporting metallic  needles
             3D  bioprinter  is  defined  as  a  robotic  device   in the most popular  and already  automated  and
           for additive  (“layer-by-layer”)  biofabrication    commercialized  scaffold-free tissue engineering
           of 3D tissue and organs in correspondence           technology are not considered as temporal
                                                                                  [12]
           with  digital  models.  Of note,  a  question  is still   support or scaffold ; and (iii) in the so-called
           under discussion – can  magnetic  and acoustic      scaffold-free bioprinting technology that is based
           bioprinters be considered as real bioprinters, or   on  LIFT,  fibrin  hydrogel  is  not  mentioned  as  a
                                                                      [13]
           must a new term “bioassemblers” be introduced       scaffold .  The  absence  of  a  clear  definition  of
           to define the new type of equipment? There are      scaffold-free technology leads to some semantic
           still  no  commercially  available  magnetic  or    confusion when authors use some sort of materials
           acoustic  bioprinters.  It  is  important  to  note  that   as temporal and removable support, and claim
           the  development  of  scientific  instrumentation  is   their techniques as “scaffold-free.” Conceptually,
           essential for technological progress and advances   if it is not a scaffold-free but still scaffold-based
           in the new research field. Thus, the focus of this   technology, then it automatically  loses its
           paper is a presentation of a new custom-designed    desirable  principal  conceptual  novelty.  We  are
           magnetic levitational bioassembler as a new type    facing the situation when some researchers who
           of device for rapid formative biofabrication of 3D   try to show pseudo-novelty and attract attention
           tissue and organs. We also outline the conceptual   are using certain  semantic tricks.  The logical
           framework  for a new emerging biomedical            question  arises:  Does any actual  scaffold-free
           field,  which  we  call  scaffold-free,  label-free,   or material-free  tissue  engineering  technology
           and nozzle-free formative biofabrication.  The      exist?  For  example, magnetic force-based  tissue
           scaffold-free and label-free magnetic levitational   engineering  (Mag-TE) could also be considered
           bioassembly are illustrative examples of emerging   as a scaffold-free or material-free  technology.
           formative biofabrication. Finally, although many    However, in our opinion, nanoparticles  be
           researchers [5-8]  and market analysts still prefer to   classified just as a new form of scaffold or at least
                                                               temporal and removable supporting structure with
           use the more familiar term “magnetic bioprinter,”   both intracellular and extracellular  localization.
           we hold a genuine belief that the name “magnetic    Thus, Mag-TE is not material-free and cannot be
           levitational  bioassembler”  is more  relevant  to   considered as scaffold-free technology.
           nozzle-free technology.
                                                               3 Label-based magnetic tissue engineering
           2  What does the “scaffold-free”  approach
           mean?                                               Mag-TE is a type of scaffold-free but label-based
                                                               biofabrication  that uses magnetic  nanoparticles
           Rapidly emerging scaffold-free tissue engineering   for enabling magnetic levitation. This technology
           is a potential alternative  to traditional  scaffold-  was initially  developed by Ito and Honda as
           based tissue engineering.  There are several        an  attempt  to  optimize  cell  sheet  technology,
           already  published  conceptual  reviews on          which was initially  developed by Prof. Okano’s
           scaffold-free  tissue engineering.  The  scaffold   group in Japan .  The application  of magnetic
                                                                              [14]
           could be broadly defined as a temporal removable    nanoparticles  enables manipulation,  handling,
           (sometimes biodegradable)  support [9,10] . In line   and rapid assembling of cell sheets into 3D tissue



                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 3       111
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120