Page 49 - IJB-6-4
P. 49

Celik, et al.







































           Figure 6. Fabrication of prototype product for physical evaluation.

           3 Results and discussion                            as the  originality  and  advantages  achieved  for
                                                               this product against competitors as detailed in the
           After initial sketching and concept evaluation, TFA   myriad of social media.
           results suggested an optimum design: Candidate 5.     During the product design process, advanced
           Structural design verification was approved in the   computer-aided  design, engineering,  and DfAM
           virtual environment and a physical prototype was    methods were successfully applied. The objectives
           tested  by  the  experts  and  a  product  satisfaction   given in the design process section were achieved.
           survey was completed by HWs during real, in situ    Critically,  light  weight  and  relatively  shorter
           hospital activities. The product satisfaction survey   AM production times were accomplished. When
           revealed  positive  responses related  to product   considering the existing products being showcased
           design  features  and  usability  (Figure  7).  The   in  social  media,  the  biggest  disadvantages  were
           frame  design  was  rated  with  67%  “excellent,”   perceived to be relatively longer AM production
           20% “good,” and 13% “average” satisfaction. No      times  per  unit.  Many  approaches  and  concepts
           user indicated an insufficiency rate for any of the   for face shield products produced using  AM
           survey questions. Under these considerations, the   technologies  have  been  proposed  during  the
           product  design  work  detailed  in  this  paper  was   COVID-19 pandemic  to  support  the  health
           completed, and the detailed design for Candidate    services. Although all of them provide some level
           5  was  approved  (Figure 8).  The  single-frame    of  functionality,  many  of  their  design  features
           design  used  <10  g  FDM  filament  and  took      lack adherence to professional design principles,
           approximately  35  min  to  build. AM  production   optimum structural topology, ergonomics, and
           time and only two-hole stamping operations are      the application of DfAM approaches. A common
           required to assemble the transparent shield to the   goal in an industrial product is to improve product
           frame. These product features can be interpreted    quality,  shorten  the  product  development  cycle,

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 4        45
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54