Page 97 - IJB-6-4
P. 97

Priyadarshini, et al.
           Funding                                                 Applications. Tissue Eng, 9:549–54.
                                                               11.  Richards DJ, Tan Y, Jia J, et al., 2013, 3D Printing for Tissue
           The authors are thankful for the support by HP-         Engineering. Israel J Chem, 53:805–14.
           NTU Digital Manufacturing Corporate Lab,            12.  Pasirayi G, Auger V, M Scott S, et al., 2011, Microfluidic
           Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. The        Bioreactors for Cell Culturing: A Review. Micro Nanosyst,
           content is solely the responsibility of the authors.    3:137–60.
           This  research  was  conducted  in  collaboration   13.  Erkal JL, Selimovic A, Gross BC, et al., 2014, 3D Printed
           with HP Inc. and supported/partially supported by       Microfluidic Devices with Integrated Versatile and Reusable
           the Singapore Government through the Industry           Electrodes. Lab Chip, 14:2023–32.
           Alignment  Fund-Industry Collaboration  Projects    14.  Rupal BS, Garcia EA, Ayranci C, et al., 2018, 3D Printed
           Grant.                                                  3D-Microfluidics:  Recent  Developments  and  Design
                                                                   Challenges. J Integr Des Proc Sci, 22:5–20.
           References                                          15.  Ball O, Nguyen BN, Placone  JK, et al., 2016, 3D Printed
                                                                   Vascular  Networks  Enhance  Viability  in  High-volume
           1.   Wang D, Liu  W, Han B, et al., 2005,  The Bioreactor:  A
                                                                   Perfusion Bioreactor. Ann Biomed Eng, 44:3435–45.
               Powerful Tool for Large-scale Culture of Animal Cells. Curr   16.  Ngo  TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, et al.,  2018, Additive
               Pharm Biotechnol, 6:397–403.
           2.   Govoni M, Lotti F, Biagiotti L, et al., 2014, An Innovative   Manufacturing  (3D  Printing):  A  Review  of  Materials,
                                                                   Methods,  Applications  and Challenges.  Compos B Eng,
               Stand-alone Bioreactor for the Highly Reproducible Transfer   143:172–96.
               of Cyclic Mechanical Stretch to Stem Cells Cultured in a 3D   17.  Oskui SM,  Diamante G,  Liao C, et al.,  2015, Assessing
               Scaffold. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 8:787–93.         and Reducing the Toxicity of 3D-Printed Parts. Environ Sci
           3.   Shimizu T, Sekine H, Yamato M, et al., 2009, Cell Sheet-  Technol Lett, 3:1–6.
               based  Myocardial  Tissue  Engineering:  New  Hope  for   18.  Urrios  A, Parra-Cabrera  C, Bhattacharjee  N, et  al., 2016,
               Damaged Heart Rescue. Curr Pharm Des, 15:2807–14.   3D-printing of Transparent Bio-microfluidic Devices in PEG-
           4.   Ozturk SS, 1996, Engineering Challenges in High Density   DA. Lab Chip, 16:2287–94.
               Cell Culture Systems. Cytotechnology, 22:3–16.  19.  Jiménez  M,  Romero  L,  Domínguez  IA, et al., 2019,
           5.   Capel AJ, Rimington RP, Lewis MP, et al., 2018, 3D Printing   Additive  Manufacturing Technologies: An  Overview  about
               for Chemical,  Pharmaceutical  and Biological Applications.   3D Printing  Methods and Future  Prospects.  Complexity,
               Nat Rev Chem, 2:422–36.                             2019;2019:9656938.
           6.   Hjertager BH, Morud K, 1995, Computational  Fluid   20.  Maia MR, Marques S, Cabrita AR, et al., 2016, Simple and
               Dynamics Simulation of Bioreactors. J Mod Identif Control,   Versatile  Turbidimetric  Monitoring  of  Bacterial  Growth  in
               16:177–91.                                          Liquid Cultures Using a Customized 3D Printed Culture Tube
           7.   Lee W, Kwon D, Choi W, et al., 2015, 3D-printed Microfluidic   Holder and a Miniaturized Spectrophotometer: Application to
               Device for the Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria Using Size-  Facultative and Strictly Anaerobic Bacteria. Front Microbiol,
               based Separation in Helical Channel with Trapezoid Cross-  7:1381.
               section. Sci Rep, 5:7717.                       21.  Dong Y, Fan SQ, Shen Y, et al., 2015, A Novel bio-carrier
           8.   Kim  Y,  Lee  J,  Park  S,  2018,  A  3D-printed  Millifluidic   Fabricated  Using  3D  Printing  Technique  for  Wastewater
               Platform Enabling Bacterial  Preconcentration  and DNA   Treatment. Sci Rep, 5:12400.
               Purification for Molecular Detection of Pathogens in Blood.   22.  Qing Y, Li K, Li D, et al., 2019, Antibacterial Effects of Silver
               Micromachines, 9:472.                               Incorporated Zeolite Coatings on 3D Printed Porous Stainless
           9.   Alessandri K, Feyeux M, Gurchenkov B, et al., 2016, A 3D   Steels. Mater Sci Eng C, 108:110430.
               Printed Microfluidic Device for Production of Functionalized   23.  Bassous  NJ, Jones CL, Webster TJ, 2019, 3-D Printed Ti-
               Hydrogel  Microcapsules  for  Culture  and  Differentiation   6Al-4V Scaffolds for Supporting Osteoblast and Restricting
               of Human Neuronal Stem Cells (hNSC).  Lab  on a Chip,   Bacterial  Functions  without  Using  Drugs:  Predictive
               16:1593–604.                                        Equations and Experiments. Acta Biomater, 96:662–73.
           10.  Bancroft GN, Sikavitsas VI, Mikos AG, 2003, Design of a Flow   24.  Morgan AJ, San Jose LH, Jamieson WD, et al., 2016, Simple
               Perfusion Bioreactor  System for Bone  Tissue-engineering   and Versatile 3D Printed Microfluidics Using Fused Filament

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 4        93
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102