Page 225 - IJB-10-6
P. 225

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3DP Ta buttress in DDH shelf acetabuloplasty




























            Figure 6. Displacement analysis between the implanted buttress position and the preoperative design. (A) Immediate postoperative pelvic radiograph is
            taken to match the preoperative designed 3D model. (B) Deviation in the placement of the porous tantalum buttress. Yellow represents the preoperative
            design position; blue represents the actual implanted position; in this case, the implanted buttress is 1.8 mm higher than the preoperative design.


            surgical incisions healed excellently, and no complications,   significant relief from hip joint pain, and their hip joint
            such as infection or thrombosis, occurred.         function  gradually  improved,  stabilizing  between  half
                                                               a year to a year postoperatively. The preoperative NAHS
            3.2. Patient-reported outcomes                     score was 71.04 ± 12.14 points, significantly increasing
            Patients were followed for 12–47 months, with an average   to 86.92 ± 5.17 points at the final follow-up (p  < 0.01);
            of 22.64 ± 10.86 months. All patients experienced   the preoperative mHHS score was 70.56 ± 9.53 points,



            Table 2. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes and imaging measurement indicators at the final follow-up with
            preoperative data
             Item                          Preoperative          Final follow-up        t              p
             NAHS                          71.04 ± 12.14           86.92 ± 5.17       −6.311          <0.01
             mHHS                          70.56 ± 9.53            87.20 ± 4.06       −8.133          <0.01
             HOS-SSS                       62.52 ± 13.53           83.84 ± 4.98        −7.49          <0.01
             iHOT-12                       51.60 ± 14.01           85.32 ± 5.51       −12.519         <0.01
             VAS                            4.56 ± 0.92            1.08 ± 1.08        12.273          <0.01
             LCE angle (°)                  7.97 ± 9.48            35.75 ± 5.40       −15.454         <0.01
             Sharp’s angle (°)             49.85 ± 5.68            41.92 ± 4.45        7.98           <0.01
             Tonnis angle (°)              26.83 ± 7.98            16.79 ± 4.89        7.568          <0.01
             Femoral coverage (%)          59.59 ± 10.64           95.95 ± 8.68       −19.902         <0.01
            Note: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Abbreviations: HOS-SSS, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale; iHOT-12, International Hip
            Outcome Tool-12; LCE, Lateral center-edge; mHHS, modified Harris Hip Score; NAHS, Non-Arthritic Hip Score; VAS, Visual Analog Scale.
            Table 3. Comparison of imaging measurement indicators at the final follow-up with immediate postoperative data
             Imaging measurement indicators   Immediate postoperative  Final follow-up     t           p
             LCE angle (°)                        36.80 ± 4.51          35.75 ± 5.40      1.14        0.265
             Sharp’s angle (°)                    41.72 ± 4.31          41.92 ± 4.45      −0.541      0.593
             Tonnis angle (°)                     16.28 ± 4.50          16.79 ± 4.89      −0.879      0.388
            Note: Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Abbreviation: LCE, lateral center edge.


            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       217                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4074
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230