Page 226 - IJB-10-6
P. 226

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3DP Ta buttress in DDH shelf acetabuloplasty




            Table 4. Correlation analysis between the placement deviation of the porous tantalum buttress and patient-reported outcomes
            (PROs)
             PROs                 Statistical metric  Pronation  Supination  High  Low  Forward     Backward
                                       r           −0.019      −0.273    0.004  −0.042   −0.173      −0.026
             NAHS
                                       p            0.953      0.366     0.985  0.973    0.572       0.933
                                       r           −0.034      0.038     −0.15  0.708    −0.007      −0.053
             mHHS
                                       p            0.917      0.903     0.505  0.499    0.982       0.863
                                       r           −0.464      −0.181   −0.322  −0.979   −0.01       −0.47
             HOS-SSS
                                       p            0.129      0.554     0.144   0.13    0.973       0.105
                                       r           −0.667      −0.462   −0.145  −0.856   −0.24       −0.634
             iHOT-12
                                       p           0.018*      0.112     0.519  0.347     0.43       0.02*
                                       r            −0.58      −0.305   −0.257  −0.829   0.009       −0.554
             Patient satisfaction
                                       p           0.047*      0.312     0.249  0.378    0.976       0.049*
            Abbreviations: HOS-SSS, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale; iHOT-12, International Hip Outcome Tool-12; mHHS, modified Harris Hip Score;
            NAHS, Non-Arthritic Hip score; VAS, Visual Analog scale.
            *Denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05).


















































             Figure 7. Scatter plot illustrating the correlation between the deviation in placement of the porous tantalum buttress and patient-reported outcomes.


            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       218                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4074
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231