Page 221 - IJB-10-6
P. 221

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3DP Ta buttress in DDH shelf acetabuloplasty




            Table 1. Modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio parameters for each component material
             Component                         Material           Modulus of elasticity (GPa)  Poisson’s ratio
             Buttress                       Tantalum (porous)              4                     0.35
                                             Tantalum (solid)             186                    0.35
             Cancellous bone                 Cancellous bone               8                      0.2
             Cortical bone                    Cortical bone                8                     0.29
             Screws                          Titanium alloy               110                    0.30
             Joint capsule                    Joint capsule              0.0105                  0.45


            stress in both the buttress and screws was lower than the   subcutaneous tissue, and superficial and deep fascia. An
            corresponding yield strengths of their materials. Finite   oblique lateral osteotomy was performed from proximal
            element mechanical analysis confirmed that the material   to distal along the lateral posterior side of the top of the
            had sufficient load-bearing capacity during use (Figure 3).  gluteus medius insertion on the greater trochanter. After
                                                               the surgical dislocation of the hip, the greater trochanter,
            2.2.5. Fabrication of 3D-printed porous            to which the gluteus medius and vastus lateralis muscles
            tantalum buttress                                  were attached, was pushed anteriorly. The gluteus minimus
            The 3D printing data of the buttress was imported into the   was completely stripped off the capsule surface at the 12
            Sailong Y150 powder bed electron beam equipment (Xi’an   o’clock position of the acetabulum, both anteriorly and
            Sailong, China). In a vacuum environment, the baseplate   posteriorly, fully exposing the joint capsule, the outer rim of
            was evenly preheated. The powder spreading device evenly   the acetabulum, and the outer table of the ilium 4 cm above
            laid down and preheated a layer of tantalum powder on the   the  acetabulum  rim  between  the  9  o’clock  and  3  o’clock
            baseplate to over 600°C using an electron beam, causing
            sintering between the powders and ensuring the stability   positions of the acetabulum. The cortical bone in this area
            of the powder bed.  This device’s electron beam had a   was ground using a burr to achieve pinpoint bleeding.
            maximum power of 3000 W, capable of melting tantalum   According to the preoperative design, the front side of
            metal at 2996°C for shaping. The slicing software selectively   the buttress reached the 3 o’clock position, the rear side
            melted the tantalum powder based on the characteristics of   extended to the 9 o’clock position, the medial side snugly
            the buttress data, while the unmelted powder in other areas   adhered to the bone surface, and the bottom side closely
            descended with the build chamber. The powder-spreading   contacted the capsule. The friction interface between the
            device then laid down a new layer of powder, initiating   buttress and the femoral head was a capsulolabral complex
            work on the next layer. Through layer-by-layer printing   and not in direct contact with the cartilage of the femoral
            and stacking, the porous tantalum buttress was printed.   head (Figure 4). Three 4.5-mm cortical screws were
            This 3D-printed porous tantalum buttress was then slowly   inserted along the planned screw holes and screw paths
            cooled to room temperature in a vacuum environment   to  fix  the  implant.  The  gluteus  minimus  was  sutured  in
            before being removed from the chamber. Compressed air   situ, the greater trochanter was relocated, and two double-
            and the impact of same-metal powder particles were used   headed compression screws were used to fix the greater
            to remove any unmelted tantalum powder from the surface   trochanter in its original position. After repeated irrigation
            and interior of the porous tantalum buttress. Thereafter,   with saline, a drain was placed, and the incision was closed
            using pure water as a medium, the porous tantalum   layer by layer.
            buttress was placed in an ultrasonic cleaner for multiple   2.4. Postoperative rehabilitation
            rounds of oscillation cleaning. After drying, the porous
            tantalum buttress was fabricated (Figure 2B and C).  Immediately upon recovery from anesthesia, ankle pump
                                                               exercises and static contractions of the quadriceps for
            2.3. Surgical techniques                           the affected limb were initiated; straight leg raises were
            All surgeries were performed by the same senior associate   conducted on the first postoperative day to strengthen the
            chief surgeon specializing in joint surgery. Under combined   iliopsoas and lower limb muscles. Within 6 weeks post-
            spinal-epidural anesthesia, patients were positioned on   surgery, partial weight-bearing activities on the affected
            their healthy side. A surgical dislocation approach was   limb could be conducted with the aid of crutches. By the
            employed to minimize the impact on the blood supply   seventh week post-surgery, the affected limb could bear
            of the hip joint. A skin incision approximately 10 cm   full weight while walking, and strengthening exercises for
            long  was  made,  sequentially  cutting  through  the  skin,   the hip abductor muscles were intensified.


            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       213                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4074
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226