Page 326 - IJB-10-6
P. 326

International Journal of Bioprinting                           3D-printed PPDO/GO stents for CHD treatment.




            1. Introduction                                    methods for vascular BRSs, such as laser cutting and
                                                               braiding,  present respective challenges. Overheating
                                                                      26
            Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth   during the laser cutting process can significantly impair
            defect, with 13.3 million patients worldwide in 2019, and   the mechanical properties of the stent.  Similarly, braided
                                                                                              27
            the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns.    stents tend to exhibit relatively low radial force. 25,28  3D
                                                          1
            CHD-related vascular stenoses account for approximately   printing has become a research focus in the development
                           2
            12% of all CHDs,  including pulmonary artery or vein   of medical implants. This technique offers advantages such
                                                         5,6
            stenosis,  coarctation of the aorta and its branches,
                   3,4
                                  7
            and postoperative stenosis.  In recent years, intravascular   as speed, cost-efficiency, flexibility in the manufacturing
                                                                                              29
            stent implantation has become the preferred treatment   location, and material conservation.  It enables the
            due to its efficacy.  Bioresorbable stents (BRSs) have been   personalized customization of products with high
                          8
            developed to overcome the drawbacks of permanent   precision and geometrical complexity, which is well-suited
            metal stents that are currently used in clinical practice.   for BRSs. Common 3D printing technologies used for
            BRSs can provide short- to mid-term radial support to   polymeric BRSs include stereolithography (SLA), selective
            prevent stenotic vessel recoil and are gradually resorbed   laser sintering (SLS), fused deposition modeling (FDM),
                                                                  30
                              9
            by the body afterward.  This reduces the risks of in-stent   etc.  During SLA, photosensitive resins are polymerized
            restenosis, stent thrombosis, and chronic inflammation. 10,11    and cured under ultraviolet (UV) light, but photoinitiators
            Most critically for pediatric patients, BRSs are adapted to   and photoabsorbers may be toxic. 31,32  SLS uses a laser to
            the vascular growth of infants and children, eliminating   partially  melt  powder  materials  and  bond  the  particles
            the need for secondary interventions, as the implanted   together, resulting in a rough surface and requiring post-
                                                                        33
            segments can perform luminal remodeling without    processing.  FDM is a cost-effective and user-friendly
            stenosis formation. Therefore, BRSs exhibit significant   method that involves melting and extruding materials,
                                                                                                          34–37
            advantages in the treatment of CHD-related vascular   which is suitable for printing thermoplastic polymers.
                                                                     38
            stenoses. Notably, there are currently no pediatric BRS   Lu et al.  developed a PPDO/stabaxol-1 stent using FDM
            products available worldwide. Many researchers have   to treat cerebrovascular disease.
            attempted to develop BRSs for pediatric patients. Various   However, the inadequate mechanical performance of
            bioresorbable materials have been studied, including   PPDO stents, as noted in our previous study,  remains
                                                                                                     39
            poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)   an issue due to their low modulus and strength. The
            (PLGA), zinc alloy, and nitride iron. 12–15  However, the   incorporation of nanofillers has been considered effective
            degradation times of all the above-mentioned materials   in  improving  the mechanical  properties  of  polymers.
            are over 1 year,  mismatching the constructive remodeling   Some  studies  have  reported  PPDO  nanocomposites
                        16
            period of vessels (3–6 months).  Prolonged degradation   reinforced with carbon nanotubes, chitin nanocrystals,
                                      17
            triggers  inflammatory  response  and  delayed  vascular   and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. 40–42  Graphene oxide
            growth. Another key issue is that, compared to stainless   (GO) is a 2D carbon nanomaterial with high modulus
            steel and CoCr alloy used in permanent metal stents,   and strength. 43,44  Its  high  specific  surface  area provides
            these bioresorbable materials exhibit inferior mechanical   a larger contact area with the composite matrix. Its rich
            properties, leading to poor radial strength of the stent.    oxygen-containing functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxyl,
                                                         18
            Radial strength is defined as the maximum force that a stent   epoxy groups) on the surface enhance the interfacial
            can withstand before collapsing and is the most critical   interaction with the  polymer  matrix  through  covalent
            mechanical property of a stent. 19,20  Low radial strength   bonds, hydrogen bonds, π–π interactions, etc., facilitating
            results in vascular recoil and flow disruptions, which can   stress transfer and improving the mechanical performance
            lead to worse conditions, including stent restenosis and   of the composite. 45,46  The hydrophilicity and surface
            stent migration. 10,21  Therefore, it is crucial to develop a BRS   negative charge of GO are conducive to protein adsorption
            with sufficient radial strength and moderate degradation   via  electrostatic  interaction,  hydrogen  bonding,  and
            time for CHD pediatric patients.                   hydrophobic interaction, which promotes cell adhesion and
               Poly(p-dioxanone)  (PPDO)  is a semi-crystalline   proliferation. 47,48  Stent implantation inevitably damages
            aliphatic  polyester  with  good  bioresorbability  and   the endothelium, leading to thrombosis and intimal
            biocompatibility.  Research has demonstrated that the   hyperplasia, thereby causing restenosis. It is essential
                         22
            degradation time of PPDO is 6 months,  and a braided   to promote endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and
                                             23
            PPDO BRS can maintain radial support for at least 3   proliferation to accelerate endothelialization.  Studies have
                                                                                                  49
            months  during  in vitro  degradation,   which  is  ideal  for   reported that GO facilitates the adhesion, proliferation,
                                          24
            CHD pediatric patients. Recently, PPDO has been explored   and migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells
            for application in vascular stents.  Traditional fabrication   (HUVECs), 50,51  demonstrating good hemocompatibility
                                      25
            Volume 10 Issue 6 (2024)                       318                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.4530
   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331