Page 117 - IJB-7-2

Arguchinskaya, et al.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw2459 Thermoreversible, Photocrosslinkable Collagen Bio-Ink
30. Dong C, Lv Y, 2016, Application of Collagen Scaffold in for Free-Form Fabrication of Scaffolds for Regenerative
Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and New Perspectives. Medicine, Technology (Singap World Sci), 5:185–95.
Polymers, 8:42. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2339547817500091
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8020042 39. Diamantides N, Wang L, Pruiksma T, et al., 2017, Correlating
31. Lee J, Kim G, 2018, Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Rheological Properties and Printability of Collagen Bioinks:
Nanofibrous Collagen Scaffold Fabricated using Fibrillated The Effects of Riboflavin Photocrosslinking and pH.
Collagen and Pluronic F-127 for Regenerating Bone Tissue. Biofabrication, 9:34102.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10:35801–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa780f
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b14088 40. Shi W, Sun M, Hu X, et al., 2017, Structurally and
32. Doyle AD, 2016, Generation of 3D Collagen Gels with Functionally Optimized Silk-Fibroin-Gelatin Scaffold Using
Controlled Diverse Architectures. Curr Protoc Cell Biol, 3D Printing to Repair Cartilage Injury In Vitro and In Vivo.
72:10.20.1–16. Adv Mater, 29: 1701089.
33. Naciri M, Kuystermans D, Al-Rubeai M, 2008, Monitoring https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701089
pH and Dissolved Oxygen in Mammalian Cell Culture Using 41. Setayeshmehr M, Esfandiari E, Rafieinia M, et al., 2019,
Optical Sensors. Cytotechnology, 57:245–50. Hybrid and Composite Scaffolds Based on Extracellular
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-008-9160-1 Matrices for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part B
34. Kim YB, Lee H, Kim GH, 2016, Strategy to Achieve Highly Rev, 25:202–24.
Porous/Biocompatible Macroscale Cell Blocks, using a https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0245
Collagen/Genipin-Bioink and an Optimal 3D Printing 42. Fitzsimmons R, Aquilino MS, Quigley J, et al., 2018,
Process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8:32230–40. Generating Vascular Channels within Hydrogel Constructs
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11669 using an Economical Open-Source 3D Bioprinter and
35. Lee J, Yeo M, Kim W, et al., 2018, Development of a Tannic Thermoreversible Gels. Bioprinting, 9:7–18.
Acid Cross-Linking Process for Obtaining 3D Porous https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2018.02.001
Cell-Laden Collagen Structure. Int J Biol Macromol, 110: 43. Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al., 2014, 3D
497–503. Bioprinting of Vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell-Laden
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.105 Tissue Constructs. Adv Mater, 26:3124–30.
36. Peng YY, Glattauer V, Ramshaw JA, 2017, Stabilisation of https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506
Collagen Sponges by Glutaraldehyde Vapour Crosslinking, 44. Paulsen SJ, Miller JS, 2015, Tissue Vascularization through
Int J Biomater, 2017:8947823. 3D Printing: Will Technology Bring us Flow? Dev Dyn,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8947823 244:629–40.
37. Mu C, Liu F, Cheng Q, et al., 2010, Collagen Cryogel https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.24254
Cross-Linked by Dialdehyde Starch. Macromol Mater Eng, 45. Kim HD, Lee Y, Kim Y, et al., 2017, Biomimetically
295:100–7. Reinforced Polyvinyl Alcohol-Based Hybrid Scaffolds for
https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.200900292 Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Polymers, 9:655.
38. Drzewiecki KE, Malavade JN, Ahmed I, et al., 2017, A https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120655

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2 113