Page 18 - IJB-7-2

The Role of 3DP Phantoms and Devices for Organ-specified Appliances in Urology
Index Tumor to Facilitate Nerve-Sparing Prostatectomy. Eur in Fibrin Hydrogel: An In Vitro Evaluation of Biomimetic
Urol, 69:377–9. Mechanical Property and Cell Growth Environment. Acta
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.024 Biomater, 50:154–64.
65. Chandak P, Byrne N, Lynch H, et al., 2018, Three-Dimensional https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008
Printing in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy-An Idea, 72. D’Alimonte L, Ravi A, Helou J, et al., 2019, Optimized Penile
Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-Term follow- Surface Mold Brachytherapy using Latest Stereolithography
up (IDEAL) Phase 2a study. BJU Int, 122:360–1. Techniques: A Single-Institution Experience. Brachytherapy,
https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14189 18:348–52.
66. Ebbing J, Jäderling F, Collins JW, et al., 2018, Comparison https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2019.01.002
of 3D Printed Prostate Models with Standard Radiological 73. Yu HS, Park J, Lee HS, et al., 2018, Feasibility of
Information to Aid Understanding of the Precise Location of Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Fabricated by Three-Dimensional
Prostate Cancer: A Construct Validation Study. PLoS One, Printing for Tissue Engineering of Tunica Albuginea. World J
13:e0199477. Mens Health, 36:66–72.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199477 https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.17025
67. Del Junco M, Yoon R, Okhunov Z, et al., 2015, Comparison 74. Srougi V, Rocha BA, Tanno FY, et al., 2016, The Use of
of Flow Characteristics of Novel Three-Dimensional Printed Three-dimensional Printers for Partial Adrenalectomy:
Ureteral Stents Versus Standard Ureteral Stents in a Porcine Estimating the Resection Limits. Urology, 90:217–20.
Model. J Endourol, 29:1065–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.11.043
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0716 75. Lurie KL, Smith GT, Khan SA, et al., 2014, Three-
68. Park CJ, Kim HW, Jeong S, et al., 2015, Anti-Reflux Ureteral Dimensional, Distendable Bladder Phantom for Optical
Stent with Polymeric Flap Valve Using Three-Dimensional Coherence Tomography and White Light Cystoscopy.
Printing: An In Vitro Study. J Endourol, 29:933–8. J Biomed Opt, 19:36009.
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0154 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.19.3.036009
69. Kuroda S, Kawahara T, Teranishi J, et al., 2019, A Case of 76. Chen MY, Skewes J, Daley R, et al., 2020, Three-Dimensional
Allograft Ureteral Stone Successfully Treated with Antegrade Printing Versus Conventional Machining in the Creation of
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Use of a 3D-Printed Model to a Meatal Urethral Dilator: Development and Mechanical
Determine the Ideal Approach. Urolithiasis, 47:467–71. Testing. Biomed Eng Online, 19:55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-019-01153-x https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-020-00799-8
70. Joshi PM, Kulkarni SB, 2020, 3D Printing of Pelvic Fracture 77. Özgür BC, Ayyıldız A, 2018, 3D Printing in Urology: Is it
Urethral Injuries-Fusion of Technology and Urethroplasty. Really Promising? Turk J Urol, 44:6–9.
Turk J Urol, 46:76–9. 78. Manning TG, O’Brien JS, Christidis D, et al., 2018, Three
https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.19165 Dimensional Models in Uro-Oncology: A Future Built with
71. Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, et al., 2017, 3D Bio-Printing of Additive Fabrication. World J Urol, 36:557–63.
Urethra with PCL/PLCL Blend and Dual Autologous Cells https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2201-2

14 International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2