Page 134 - IJB-7-4
P. 134

Mass Customization of Respiratory Protective Equipment
               There are statistically significant differences between   laser sintering,  and post-processing techniques  on the
           the Young and the Senior groups for RMSE Euclidean   surface finish of the mask/face contact area, and Young’s
           distance,  and between the  Asian and Others, Healthy   Modulus, biocompatibility and sterilizability of the print
           and  Obese,  Young  and  Middle-age,  and  Young  and   materials. Different filter materials with different levels
           Senior for Maximum  Euclidean distance.  Nonetheless,   of particle filtration capabilities can also be evaluated to
           all  differences  in  their  absolute  values  (Table  2) were   Filter materials, with different levels of particle filtration
           <1 mm. The Maximum Euclidean distance is 1.7 mm –   capabilities, can also be investigated to determine their
           2.3 mm for each of these groups, which are significantly   performance and impact on custom fitted masks.
           smaller than the 6 mm gap reported in similar commercial
           masks .  With  a  much  smaller  gap  to  fill,  users  can   4. Conclusions
                [78]
           potentially  apply less strap pressure onto the mask to   This study presented a fully automated design pipeline
           create a good seal, reducing chances of skin trauma.  to enable MC of RPE via  AM.  The pipeline  was
               This study may be under-powered as the current   validated  against 205 facial scans to generate custom
           sample is skewed towards male, White, and high BMI   fit respirator mask CAD models. The pipeline achieved
           populations,  whereas the  sample  size  for female,  non-  96% processing success rate with <2 min/scan processing
           White and normal BMI populations were small. Future   time.  When  virtually  fitted,  the  mean  RMSE  and
           studies should look to collect a more evenly distributed   Maximum Euclidean  distance between the masks and
           gender, BMI and ethnicity sample with a larger sample   faces were 0.62 mm and 2.03 mm, respectively. It was
           size to further validate the universality of this pipeline.   found that there was no statistically significant difference
           Nonetheless, initial  results show  great potential  to   in goodness of fit between different age, gender, ethnicity,
           produce  customized  RPE  products  that  can  fit  equally   and  BMI subgroups. When  combined  with  appropriate
           well  across  different  demographic  and  demographic   AM processes and  materials, it  could  be  a  promising
           subgroups. This contrasts current anthropometric sizing   route towards the true MC of RPE or even other body-
           methodologies which contain inherent biases due to the   fitted products.
           sample populations they were cased on.
               The proposed pipeline was deployed as an online   Acknowledgments
           application which promoted decentralized manufacturing   The authors would like to thank Lara Lewington and the
           during the period when there was a global shortage of RPE.   team from the BBC, and Kristie Lu Stout from the CNN,
           However, the pipeline’s main contribution is to quickly   for featuring this study - the Mensura Mask project. These
           create  custom-fitted  RPE  models  that  offer  superior  fit   media exposures have greatly helped us with volunteer
           to commercial masks, making it a viable tool to produce   recruitment around world so that we can build a dataset
           RPE products in the healthcare and construction industry   with better demographic distribution. The authors would
           where good fit and comfort are required. This pipeline can   also like to thank Mike Westlake from the Autodesk for
           be deployed quickly in the extent of future pandemics.  connecting us with the CNN. Finally, the authors would
               The  pipeline  was validated  computationally  to   like to thank all volunteers who have participated in this
           demonstrate  that  it  is  possible  to  rapidly  produce  RPE   study.
           design models that fit well to a user’s face. The pipeline
           offers a route to lower product unit costs by automating   Funding
           the design phase, thus removing that  barrier  for mass
           customizing  wearables. It also shows  a novel and   This work was funded by Community Jameel and Imperial
           promising design methodology  that  is not inherently   College London under the award of the Community
           biased towards specific demographic group as it is in the   Jameel  Imperial  College  COVID-19 Excellence  Fund,
           traditional  anthropometric  sizing approach.  The mask   and the Imperial College President’s PhD  Scholarship
           model presented in this pipeline had been shown to be   Fund.
           successfully fabricated  through the stereolithography   Conflicts of interest
           (SLA) process in our previous study , taking an average
                                         [65]
           of 8 h and using 40 mL of resin to fabricate the mask   The authors declare no conflict of interest.
           body.  A  fit  test  study  is  currently  being  conducted  to
           evaluate the performance of the 3D printed custom-fitted   References
           masks against commercial  masks. Future studies can   1.   Lan J, Song Z, Miao Z, et al., 2020, Skin Damage among
           build upon our previous and current work to investigate
           other  factors  affecting  the  manufacturing  of  the  mask,   Health Care Workers Managing Coronavirus Disease-2019.
           including  the  impact  of  different  AM  build  processes,   J Am Acad Dermatol, 82:1215-6.
           such as SLA, fused deposition modeling and selective   2.   Gefen  A,  Alves P, Ciprandi G,  et al., 2020, Device-related

           130                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139