Page 208 - IJB-8-1
P. 208

3D Printing of a Graphene-Modified Photopolymer Using SLA
           dispersibility and light absorbance. Nevertheless, negative      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111180
           effect of G is not an indication that it is not possible to   5.   Schüller-Ravoo S, Teixeira SM, Feijen J, et al., 2013, Flexible
           print  with  R+G  mixture  but  printing  parameters  must   and  Elastic  Scaffolds  for  Cartilage  Tissue  Engineering
           be optimized to compensate the negative effect of G on   Prepared  by  Stereolithography  Using  Poly  (Trimethylene
           polymerization.                                         Carbonate)-Based Resins. Macromol Biosci, 13:1711–9.
               Therefore,  understanding  how  GBN  affects
           polymerization and the properties of the resin is crucial to      https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201300399
           adapt printing parameters (e.g., light intensity, exposure   6.   Sodian  R,  Loebe  M,  Hein  A,  et al.,  2002,  Application
           time,  layer  thickness,  etc.)  and  resin  formulation   of  Stereolithography  for  Scaffold  Fabrication  for  Tissue
           (e.g.,  maximum  permissible  nanoparticles  amount,    Engineered Heart Valves. ASAIO J, 48:12–6.
           photoinitiator amount, etc.) to improve 3D printing that      https://doi.org/10.1097/00002480-200201000-00004
           capitalizes on SLA accuracy.                        7.   Lee  KW,  Wang  S,  Fox  BC,  et al.,  2007,  Poly  (Propylene

           Acknowledgments                                         Fumarate)  Bone  Tissue  Engineering  Scaffold  Fabrication
                                                                   using Stereolithography: Effects of Resin Formulations and
           We would like to thank to Mariano Jiménez.              Laser Parameters. Biomacromolecules, 8:1077–84.
           Funding                                                 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060834v
                                                               8.   Lu  F,  Wu  R,  Shen  M,  et al.,  2021,  Rational  Design  of
           This  work  was  supported  by  Comillas  Pontifical    Bioceramic  Scaffolds  with  Tuning  Pore  Geometry  by
           University (grant number PP2020_08).
                                                                   Stereolithography: Microstructure Evaluation and Mechanical
           Conflict of interest                                    Evolution. J Eur Ceram Soc, 41:1672–82.
           No conflict of interest was reported by all authors.     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.002
                                                               9.   Dabbagh  SR,  Sarabi  MR,  Rahbarghazi  R,  et al.,  2020,
           Author contributions                                    3D-Printed  Microneedles  in  Biomedical  Applications.

           S.F., Y.B. and E.P. conceptualization. S.L., S.F. and E.P.   iScience, 24:102012.
           data  collection.  S.L.,  Y.B.  and  J.C.D.R.  analysis  and      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.102012
           interpretation  of  results.  S.L.  and  E.P.  writing,  original   10.  Xenikakis  I,  Tzimtzimis  M,  Tsongas  K,  et  al.,  2019,
           draft preparation. S.F., Y.B., J.C.D.R. and N.D. writing,   Fabrication and Finite Element Analysis of Stereolithographic
           review and editing.  J.C.D.R., N.D. and E.P. supervision.   3D  Printed  Microneedles  for  Transdermal  Delivery  of
           All authors reviewed the results and approved the final   Model Dyes Across Human Skin In Vitro. Eur J Pharm Sci,
           version of the manuscript.
                                                                   137:104976.
           References                                              https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.104976
                                                               11.  Wang J, Goyanes A, Gaisford S, et al., 2016, Stereolithographic
           1.   Borrello  J,  Nasser  P,  Iatridis  JC,  et al.,  2018,  3D  Printing   (SLA) 3D Printing of Oral Modified-Release Dosage Forms.
               a  Mechanically-Tunable  Acrylate  Resin  on  a  Commercial   Int J Pharm, 503:207–212.
               DLP-SLA Printer. Addit Manuf, 23:374–80.            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.03.016
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.019     12.  Karakurt  I,  Aydoğdu  A,  Çıkrıkcı  S,  et al.,  2020,
           2.   Borrello J, Backeris P, 2017, Rapid Prototyping Technologies.   Stereolithography  (SLA)  3D  Printing  of  Ascorbic  acid
               In:  Rapid  Prototyping  in  Cardiac  Disease:  3D  Printing  the   Loaded Hydrogels: A Controlled Release Study. Int J Pharm,
               Heart, p41–9.                                       584:119482.
               https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53523-4_5         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119428
           3.   Vasamsetty P, Pss T, Kukkala D, et al., 2020, 3D Printing   13.  Chen X, Ware HO, Baker E, et al., 2017, The Development
               in  Dentistry-Exploring  the  New  Horizons.  Mater  Today,   of an All-polymer-based Piezoelectric Photocurable Resin for
               26:838–41.                                          Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 65:157–62.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.049         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.025
           4.   Baumgartner  S,  Gmeiner  R,  Schönherr  JA,  et  al.,  2020,   14.  Cheng  WT,  Chih YW, Yeh  WT,  2007,  In Situ  Fabrication
               Stereolithography-Based Additive Manufacturing of Lithium   of  Photocurable  Conductive  Adhesives  with  Silver  Nano-
               Disilicate Glass Ceramic for Dental Applications. Mater Sci   Particles in the Absence of Capping Agent. Int J Adhes Adhes,
               Eng C, 116:111180.                                  27:236–43.

           194                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213