Page 11 - IJB-8-3
P. 11

Liu, et al.
           for scaffold fabrication were fixed at the temperature of   onto  the  sample  with  a  current  of  30  mA  for  30  s  to
           25 ± 1°C and relative humidity of 65 ± 10%.         form a conductive layer. Subsequently, the samples were
                                                               analyzed  with  the  following  settings:  Beam  energy  at
           2.3. Post-processing of printed RPE scaffolds       10 kV, dwell time of 6 μs, a spot size of 4.0, and collection
           The printed scaffolds on silicon wafer were transferred   with a large field detector. Morphology information was
           into  a  vacuum  drying  chamber  to  discard  the  excess   obtained  at  1000×,  whereas  the  side-mounted  samples
           AcOH  for  2  h.  The  scaffolds  were  detached  from  the   were  used  for  cross-sectional  imaging  and  thickness
           silicon wafer, cut into round shapes with a diameter of   measurements at 2000×. PET membranes were processed
           11 mm with a round shape cutter, and then attached to the   and evaluated using the same parameters and procedures,
           empty cell culture inserts (Figure 1B).             except the pore sizes. The porosity (Φ) was calculated by
                                                                          ρ
           2.4. Morphological characterization                     Φ=  1−  s                              (2.1)
                                                                          ρ 0
           Fiber  diameters,  pore  sizes,  and  fiber  alignment  of  the
           scaffolds were examined and measured using an optical   Where, ρ  and ρ  are the apparent densities of the
                                                                           s
                                                                                 0
           microscope (EZ4 HD, Leica, Germany). The results were   scaffolds and biomaterials, respectively.
           expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Furthermore,   2.5. Mechanical testing
           the  morphology  was  characterized  using  a  scanning
           electron  microscope  (SEM,  FEI  Quanta  250,  Thermo   The  initial  part  of  the  stress-strain  curve  was  obtained
           Fisher  Scientific,  USA).  Samples  were  sectioned  into   using the Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA, Q800, TA
           the size of 5 mm × 5 mm and were mounted on a round   Instruments, USA) instrument at room temperature. The
           metal stud using conductive copper tape for surface or   ultimate stress and strain were examined using a universal
           cross-sectional  imaging.  Sputter  coating  was  applied   testing  machine  (HDB609B-S,  Haida  International

                        A




















                        B








                        C










           Figure 1. Process of building RPE models using EHDJ-printed PCL scaffolds. (A) Fabricating ultrathin monolayer PCL scaffolds through
           EHDJ printing. (B) Post-processing of the printed scaffolds. (C) Seeding and culturing of RPE cells.

           3                           International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16