Page 265 - IJB-8-3
P. 265

Kriegel, et al.
           solution was supplemented with 0.5 μg and 5 μg BSP   2.6. Histology
           or 2  μg BMP-7, respectively, and pipetted manually   2.6.1. Calvaria model
           into the 3D-printed PLA cylinder and polymerized at
           room temperature for 30  min.  Figure  1A shows the   After  radiologic  analysis,  the  skulls  were  decalcified
           printed cylinder filled with collagen corresponding to   using a 10% EDTA solution for at least 8 weeks, with
                                                                                           nd
           an excised piece of rat femur. For release kinetics, the   the  solution  exchanged  every  2   day  during  the  first
           cylinder loaded with BSP was placed in 500 μL PBS.   2 weeks and then weekly. The skulls were dehydrated by
           Complete supernatants were collected and replaced   the Sakura VIP E150 Tissue Processor (Sakura Finetek
           by fresh PBS after 1, 2, 4, 24, 48, and 72 h and the   GmbH,  Rüsselsheim,  Germany)  and  then  embedded
           BSP  content  was  measured  using  a  specific  ELISA   in paraffin wax. The resulting blocks were cut in 5 μm
           (Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany) as described   slices, deparaffinized, and then stained with hematoxylin
           by the manufacturer.  The release was calculated as   and eosin (HE).
           percentage in relation to the loaded amount of BSP,   2.6.2. Femora model
           which was set to 100%.
               Fifty-two  10-week-old  Wistar  rats  (Janvier,   Femora were sent to LLS Rowiak (Hannover, Germany)
           France) were acclimatized for 3 days before they were   for laser-based dissection and histology (HE and Masson-
           subdivided into four groups according to Table S3 (as   Goldner  trichrome  staining).  Quantification  of  bone
           negative controls an empty defect [n = 6] and PLA alone   area  was performed  with ImageJ and the  plugin  color
           [n = 6], as test groups PLA + collagen alone [n = 10]   deconvolution 2.
           or  loaded  with  two  different  BSP  concentrations  and
           as positive control loaded with BMP-7 [each n = 10]).   2.7. Masson-Goldner Trichrome Staining
           Anesthesia was performed as described above. To create   Nuclei were stained for 5 min with hematoxylin according
           the desired femoral osteotomy of 6 mm in length, we   to  Weigert,  washed  with  1%  acetic  acid  followed
           used the rat fix system (RISystem, Davos, Switzerland)   by  Ponceau-S  staining  (Sigma-Aldrich,  Darmstadt,
           as described before [26] . The PLA cylinder was set in the   Germany) for 10 min. After another washing step with
           defect without further fixation (Figure 1B, arrow). The   acetic acid (1%), samples were placed in acid orange G
           wound  was  closed  with  resorbable  Vicryl  sutures  4-0   solution  (Carl  Roth,  Karlsruhe,  Germany)  for  10  min.
           (Ethilon, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). X-rays were   After  rinsing  in  1%  acetic  acid,  samples  were  stained
           performed directly after surgery (Figure 1C, the PLA   with  light  green  (Merck  Chemicals  GmbH,  Darmstadt,
           cylinder is not visible in the X-ray, but its position is   Germany) for 10 min, then rinsed again in 1% acetic acid
           marked with the arrow) and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. The   for 30 s.
           rats  were  sacrificed  4  (n  =  26)  and  8  weeks  (n  =  26)
           after surgery by exposure to CO . Femora were placed   2.8. Elastica van Gieson staining
                                       2
           in  4.5%  paraformaldehyde  solution  for  μCT and   Nuclei were stained for 5 min with hematoxylin according
           histological analyses.                              to Weigert then rinsed with distilled water for 10 min.
               Bone  formation  was evaluated  using a  high-  After staining with resorcinol-fuchsine solution (Waldeck
           resolution  microcomputed  tomography  (μCT)  scanner   GmbH and Co. KG, Münster, Germany), samples were
           (CT 40, SCANCO Medical AG, Brüttisellen, Switzerland)   again rinsed with distilled water for 10 min. Then, samples
           and analyzed as described  before . For generation   were incubated with van Gieson solution (fuchsin-picric
                                          [26]
           of 3D graphics, the software Osirix (aycan, Würzburg,   acid; Waldeck GmbH & Co. KG, Münster, Germany) for
           Germany) was used.                                  5 min, dehydrated in alcohols, cleared, and mounted.

            A            B                  C                  2.9. Statistical analyses

                                                               Statistical  analyses were performed using the SPSS
                                                               software (IBM, Version 23) or GraphPad Prism software.
                                                               The results are presented as medians and quartiles or as
                                                               means ± standard deviation. Measurements were carried
                                                               out in triplicates, except for ELISA measurements
                                                               (duplicate). Cell-based experiments were independently
           Figure 1. (A) 3D-printed PLA cylinder filled with collagen type I
           corresponding to an excised piece of rat femur. (B) PLA cylinder   repeated 3 times with osteoblasts from different donors.
           press-fit  set  in  the  created  defect  and  (C)  X-ray  directly  after   Normally  distributed  data  were  analyzed  by one-way
           surgery. The position of the not visible PLA cylinder (appearing as   ANOVA.  Depending  on  Levene’s  test  for  equality  of
           a hole and marked with an arrow).                   variances,  pairwise  comparisons  were conducted  either

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3       257
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270