Page 289 - IJB-8-3

Zheng, et al.
al., 2018, Decellularized Human Ovarian Scaffold based on 22. Caralt M, Uzarski JS, Iacob S, et al, 2015, Optimization and
a Sodium Lauryl Ester Sulfate (SLES)-treated Protocol, as Critical Evaluation of Decellularization Strategies to Develop
a Natural Three-dimensional Scaffold for Construction of Renal Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds as Biological Templates
Bioengineered Ovaries. Stem Cell Res Ther, 9:252. for Organ Engineering and Transplantation. Am J Transplant,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0971-5 15:64–75.
12. Pors SE, Ramløse M, Nikiforov D, et al., 2019, Initial Steps https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12999
in Reconstruction of the Human Ovary: Survival of Pre-antral 23. Badylak SF, Gilbert TW, 2008, Immune Response to Biologic
Stage Follicles in a Decellularized Human Ovarian Scaffold. Scaffold Materials. Semin Immunol, 20:109–16.
Hum Reprod, 34:1523–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.003
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez077 24. Heeren AM, Iperen LV, Klootwijk DB, et al., 2015, Fernandes
13. Chiti C, Viswanath A, Vanacker J, et al., 2016, Development of Development of the Follicular Basement Membrane during
a Transplantable Artificial Ovary: Influence of Follicle Stage Human Gametogenesis and Early Folliculogenesis. BMC Dev
on Transplantation Outcome. In: Front Bioeng Biotechnol, Biol, 15:4.
Conference Abstract: 10 World Biomaterials Congress. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-015-0054-0
th
https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.00699 25. Streuli C, 1999, Extracellular Matrix Remodelling and
14. Moroni L, Boland T, Burdick JA, et al., 2018, Biofabrication: Cellular Differentiation. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 11:634–40.
A Guide to Technology and Terminology. Trends Biotechnol, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0955-0674(99)00026-5
36:384–402. 26. Welham NV, Chang Z, Smith LM, et al., 2013, Proteomic
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015 Analysis of a Decellularized Human Vocal Fold Mucosa
15. Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho DW, et al., 2018, A Definition Scaffold using 2D Electrophoresis and High-resolution Mass
of Bioinks and their Distinction from Biomaterial Inks. Spectrometry. Biomaterials, 34:669–76.
Biofabrication, 11:013001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.050
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 27. Turner AEB, Yu C, Bianco J, et al., 2012, The Performance
16. Abaci A, Guvendiren M, 2020, Designing Decellularized of Decellularized Adipose Tissue Microcarriers as an
Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. Adv Inductive Substrate for Human Adipose-derived Stem Cells.
Healthc Mater, 9:e2000734. Biomaterials, 33:4490–9.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000734 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.026
17. Hou CX, Zheng JH, Li ZK, et al., 2021, Printing 3D Vagina 28. Yu C, Bianco J, Brown C, et al., 2013, Porous Decellularized
Tissue Analogues with Vagina Decellularized Extracellular Adipose Tissue Foams for Soft Tissue Regeneration.
Matrix Bioink. Int J Biol Macromol., 180:177–86. Biomaterials, 34:3290–302.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.070 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.056
18. Badylak SF, 2004, Xenogeneic Extracellular Matrix as 29. Wang XH, Yan YN, Zhang RJ, 2007, Rapid Prototyping
a Scaffold for Tissue Reconstruction. Transpl Immunol, as a Tool for Manufacturing Bioartificial Livers. Trends
12:367–77. Biotechnol, 25:505–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trim.2003.12.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.08.010
19. Petersen TH, Calle EA, Zhao L, et al., 2010, Tissue-engineered 30. Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, et al., 2018, 3D
Lungs for in vivo Implantation. Science, 329:538–41. Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs for Regenerative Medicine.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189345 Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132:296–332.
20. Uygun BE, Soto-Gutierrez A, Yagi H, et al., 2010, Organ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
Reengineering Through Development of a Transplantable 31. Ferlin KM, Prendergast ME, Miller ML, et al., 2016, Influence
Recellularized Liver Graft using Decellularized Liver Matrix. of 3D Printed Porous Architecture on Mesenchymal Stem Cell
Nat Med, 16:814–20. Enrichment and Differentiation. Acta Biomater, 32:161–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.007
21. Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF, 2011, An Overview 32. Hu K, Cui F, Lv Q, et al., 2008, Preparation of Fibroin/
of Tissue and whole Organ Decellularization Processes. Recombinant Human-like Collagen Scaffold to Promote
Biomaterials, 32:3233–43. Fibroblasts Compatibility. J Biomed Mater Res A, 84:483–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31440

International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3 281