Page 296 - IJB-8-4
P. 296

3D Printed Dressings for Burn Wound Treatment
               The results from this study provide substantial   wound  treatment,  but  also  for  other  complex  chronic
           evidences  on  the  effects  of  gelatin:  alginate  ratio  on   ulcers such as diabetic foot ulcers and vascular ulcers
           printability  and mechanical  properties.  As  discussed,   as well as to develop skin models for pharmaceutical
           alginate content showed positive effects on flowability,   and cosmetic industries.
           shape  fidelity,  and  mechanical  stiffness  due  to  the
           higher  molecular  weight  of alginate  and the  formation   Acknowledgment
           of crosslinks within the alginate network. Accordingly,   The authors wish to express sincere thanks to Drs. Delbert
           gelatin content positively affected degradation rate and   Day,  Yue-wern  Huang,  Anthony  Convertine,  Douglass
           hydration  activity  due to the lower molecular  weight   Bristow, Nathan Leigh, Richard Watters, and Baojun Bai
           and higher permeability. Furthermore,  gelatin  content   for their consultation advice and infrastructure support.
           is associated with higher cell viability and proliferation
           due  to  the  amino  acid  sequences,  specifically  RGDs   Funding
           as a favorable anchor for cell attachment.  Overall, the
           3D-printed  dressing  with  6  wt/v%  gelatin  and  2 w/v%   This work was funded by Midwest Biomedical
           alginate showed the best balance among shape fidelity,   Accelerator  Consortium  (MBArC), an NIH Research
           mechanical  properties  matched  with normal  skin,   Evaluation and Commercialization Hub (REACH), and
           hydration activity, and in vitro biological response. We   by Ozark Biomaterial Initiative.
           examined  3D  printing  and  hydrogel  composition  as   Conflict of interest
           two independent variables to more accurately judge the
           proposed dressings on deep PTB wound treatment. The   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
           3D-printed dressings showed faster wound closure and
           lower wound contracture than the non-printed hydrogel   Author contribution
           with the same composition and the standard of care, that   Conceptualization: Fateme Fayyazbakhsh, Ming C. Leu
           is, petrolatum gauze.                               Data curation: Fateme Fayyazbakhsh, Michael J. Khayat

           4. Conclusion                                       Formal analysis: Fateme  Fayyazbakhsh, Michael  J.
                                                                  Khayat
           In this study, we proposed hydrogel wound dressings   Funding acquisition: Fateme  Fayyazbakhsh, Ming C.
           based  on  different  gelatin:  alginate  ratios  that  can  be   Leu
           fabricated and customized using 3D printing technology.   Methodology: Fateme Fayyazbakhsh
           The  present  findings  confirm  that  the  higher  alginate   Investigation: Fateme Fayyazbakhsh, Ming C. Leu
           content is associated with higher viscosity and tensile   Project administration: Ming C. Leu
           stiffness, while the higher gelatin content is associated   Writing – original draft: Fateme Fayyazbakhsh
           with faster degradation and higher cell viability.   Writing – review and editing: Ming C. Leu.
           Together, the 3D-printed dressing with 75% gelatin and
           25%  alginate  showed  the  best  tradeoff  among  shape   References
           fidelity, mechanical stiffness matched with normal skin,
           hydration activity, and  in vitro biological response.   1.   Kowal S, Kruger E, Bilir P, et al., 2019, Cost-effectiveness of
           The  findings  from  in  vivo  burn  wound  healing  show   the Use of Autologous Cell Harvesting Device Compared to
           evidence of the positive effects of 3D-printed dressings   Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United
           on wound healing compared to non-printed hydrogels.     States. Adv Ther, 36:1715–29.
           Overall, the outcome of this study provides promising      https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-019-00961-2
           insights  for  using  bioink  formulations toward  3D   2.   James SL, Lucchesi  LR,  Bisignano  C,  et  al., 2020,
           printing technology as a versatile approach to tissue
           engineering and regenerative medicine. The results of   Epidemiology of Injuries from Fire, Heat and Hot Substances:
           this research can also help further research on more    Global, Regional  and National  Morbidity and Mortality
           complicated bioinks incorporated with nanoparticles,    Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. Inj
           growth  factors, and  bioactive  reagents  by  providing   Prev, 26:i36–45.
           details on the gelatin-alginate interactions as a tunable      https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043299
           combination of printability and bioactivity.  We    3.   Price  K, Lee  KC,  Woolley  KE,  et  al.,  2021,  Burn  Injury
           envision  that  3D-printed  gelatin-alginate  bioinks  can   Prevention in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping
           be further extended through the other aspects of skin
           bioprinting by incorporation of stem cells and other    Systematic Review. Burns Trauma, 9:tkab037.
           signaling factors to facilitate scarless wound healing      https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab037
           and regeneration of skin appendages not only for burn   4.   Zavlin D, Chegireddy V, Boukovalas S, et al., 2018, Multi-

           288                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4
   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301