Page 117 - IJB-9-1
P. 117

International Journal of Bioprinting


                                        RESEARCH ARTICLE
                                        A 3D bioprinted tumor model fabricated with

                                        gelatin/sodium alginate/decellularized
                                        extracellular matrix bioink



                                        Jie Xu , Shuangjia Yang , Ya Su , Xueyan Hu , Yue Xi , Yuen Yee Cheng ,
                                             1†
                                                                                     1
                                                                                                    2
                                                                              1
                                                            1†
                                                                   1
                                        Yue Kang *, Yi Nie *, Bo Pan *, Kedong Song *
                                                                               1
                                                       4,5
                                                                 6
                                                3
                                        1 State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian R&D Center for Stem Cell and Tissue Engineering,
                                        Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
                                        2 Institute  for  Biomedical  Materials and Devices, Faculty of  Science, University  of  Technology
                                        Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
                                        3
                                        Department of Breast Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, 44 Xiaoheyan Road,
                                        Dadong District, Shenyang 110042, China
                                        4 Zhengzhou Institute of Emerging Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China
                                        5 Key  Laboratory of  Green Process and Engineering,  Institute  of  Process  Engineering,  Chinese
                                        Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
                                        6 Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 467 Zhongshan
                                        Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China
                                        (This article belongs to the Special Issue: Advances in 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine and
                                        drug screening)
            † These authors contributed equally   Abstract
            to this work.
                                        Tissue-engineered scaffolds are more commonly used to construct three-dimension-
            *Corresponding authors:
            Kedong Song                 al (3D) tumor models for in vitro studies when compared to the conventional two-
            (Kedongsong@dlut.edu.cn)    dimensional (2D) cell culture because the microenvironments provided by the 3D
            Yue Kang                    tumor models closely resemble the in vivo system and could achieve higher success
            (kangyue@cancerhosp-ln-cmu.com)
            Yi Nie (ynie@ipe.ac.cn);    rate when the scaffolds are translated for use in pre-clinical animal model. Physical
            Bo Pan (dmupanbo@hotmail.com)  properties, heterogeneity, and cell behaviors of the model could be regulated to simu-
            Citation: Xu J, Yang S, Su Y, et   late different tumors by changing the components and concentrations of materials. In
            al., 2023, A 3D bioprinted tumor   this study, a novel 3D breast tumor model was fabricated by bioprinting using a bioink
            model fabricated with gelatin/sodium   that consists of porcine liver-derived decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) with
            alginate/decellularized extracellular
            matrix bioink. Int J Bioprint, 9(1): 630.   different concentrations of gelatin and sodium alginate. Primary cells were removed
            https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.630   while extracellular matrix components of porcine liver were preserved. The rheolog-
                                        ical properties of biomimetic bioinks and the physical properties of hybrid scaffolds
            Received: May 29, 2022
            Accepted: September 2, 2022   were investigated, and we found that the addition of gelatin increased hydrophilia
            Published Online: October 28,   and viscoelasticity, while the addition of alginate increased mechanical properties and
            2022
                                        porosity. The swelling ratio, compression modulus, and porosity could reach 835.43 ±
            Copyright: © 2022 Author(s). This is   130.61%, 9.64 ± 0.41 kPa, and 76.62 ± 4.43%, respectively. L929 cells and the mouse
            an Open Access article distributed   breast tumor cells 4T1 were subsequently inoculated to evaluate biocompatibility of
            under the terms of the Creative
            Commons Attribution License,   the scaffolds and to form the 3D models. The results showed that all scaffolds exhibited
            permitting distribution and   good biocompatibility, and the average diameter of tumor spheres could reach 148.52
            reproduction in any medium,   ± 8.02 μm on 7 d. These findings suggest that the 3D breast tumor model could serve
            provided the original work is properly
            cited.                      as an effective platform for anticancer drug screening and cancer research in vitro.
            Publisher’s Note: Whioce
            Publishing remains neutral with   Keywords: Tumor model; Decellularized extracellular matrix; Gelatin; Sodium
            regard to jurisdictional claims in
            published maps and institutional   alginate; Three-dimensional bioprinting
            affiliations.

            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        109                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.630
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122