Page 49 - IJB-9-2
P. 49

International Journal of Bioprinting                             Biocompatible materials and Multi Jet Fusion



            2.3. Characterization of the grafts                Table 2. Test method of extraction test
            The morphology of the grafts was examined by scanning   Parameter items  Test methods
            electron microscopy (Hitachi) operating at 15 kV .
                                                   [14]
                                                                Appearance         Observe with the naked eye.
               Additionally, the mechanical properties of the PCL   pH             Test according to the test method for
            grafts were measured by performing tensile tests and                   plastic pharmaceutical containers.
            bending tests using a universal testing machine (Force   Heavy metal   Test according to Method 1 of the Metal
            tester MCT-2150, A&D Company limited) with a 1 kN-                     Test Method in the Korean Pharmaco-
            maximum load cell at a cross-head speed of 10 mm/                      poeia. Take 10 mL of the extract and
            min.                                                                   add 2 mL of lead standard solution to
                                                                                   the comparative solution.
               Differential scanning calorimetry (Q10) analysis   Potassium permanganate-   Take 20 mL of extract and control solu-
            was used to measure the crystallinity. The samples were   reducible substances  tion and carry out the test according to
            heating at rate of 10°C/min from 0°C to 100°C in N2                    the test method for plastic pharmaceuti-
            (-70°C–100°C). The enthalpy of fusion of 100% crystalline              cal containers.
            PCL (∆H_m^0) is 139.5 J/g. The percent crystallinity of
            samples was calculated using the formula as follows:   2.6. In vivo studies
                  % Crystallinity = (∆H_m)/(∆H_m^0 )×100       All animals (Sprague Dawley [SD] rats, male, 7 weeks,
                                                               200–300 g) were cared for according to methods approved
               Concordance with the original image of the graft was   by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
            evaluated. For this evaluation, a 3D structure including   (IACUC No. 2020-0019 and 2021-0010) at SMG-SNU
            a curved surface was designed and then printed. After   Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
            scanning the printed structure, its size was compared with
            the size of the design drawing.                       The degradation pattern of the PCL graft in the body
                                                               was observed. After being subcutaneously implanted in
            2.4. Evaluation of the uniformity and defective rate  the SD rats, the graft was harvested at 3 months, 6 months,
            The uniformity of the microstructure of the graft was   9 months, and 12 months to observe the appearance
            evaluated. After measuring the thickness of the layer at   and microstructure. In  addition,  the molecular  weight
            random, the standard deviation was calculated.     and tensile strength at 12 months were measured by gel
                                                               permeation chromatography  (Waters)  and  universal
               The defective rate of the sample was investigated by
            measuring the size of the prepared graft, and by observing   testing machine, respectively.
            the microstructure, samples exceeding 10% from the   2.7. Statistical analysis
            standard value were counted.                       All the samples were assayed in triplicates, and the results
               The size and thickness were measured using a vernier   obtained were expressed in standard deviations (SD)
            caliper, and the microstructure was observed using a   above and below the mean (mean ± SD). All statistical
            microscope.                                        analyses were carried out with analysis of variance using
                                                               Prism software. Results were considered to be statistically
            2.5. Biocompatibility tests                        significant when the P-value was less than 0.05.
            The  cytotoxicity  test  of  the  PCL  graft  was  evaluated
            according to ISO10993 guidelines. It was performed using   3. Results and discussion
            mouse fibroblast (L-929 mouse fibroblast cells). High-  3.1. Screw extrusion 3D bioprinter
            density polyethylene film (Hatano Research Institute)
            and ZDEC Polyurethane film (Hatano Research Institute)   Table 3. Specifications of screw extrusion-type bioprinter
            were used for negative control and positive control,
            respectively .                                      Items                         Specifications
                     [15]
               In order to investigate whether impurities were mixed   Structure of printer   Orthogonal structure
            in the printing process, an extraction test was performed   Temperature range     30–200°C
            (Table 2). The items include appearance, pH, heavy metal,   Bed size              100 × 100 × 100 mm
            and potassium permanganate-reducible substances,    Conveying device              GT2 belt
            and the test was conducted according to the “Korean   Maximum printing speed      0–20 mm/s
            Pharmacopoeia-Containers-Plastics Physicochemical test”
            guidelines. Extraction was carried out at a rate of 3 cm    Rotational speed      100–1000 mm/s
                                                          2
            (surface area)/mL at 50 ± 2°C for 72 hours.         Minimum movement distance     12.5 µm

            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                         41                     https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.652
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54