Page 44 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Scaffolds printed with light sheet stereolithography

Writing – review & editing: Alejandro Madrid-Sánchez, scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography.
Fabian Duerr, Yunfeng Nie, Hugo Thienpont, and Biomaterials, 33: 3824–3834.
Heidi Ottevaere https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048

Ethics approval and consent to participate 10. Park S, Kim G, Jeon YC, et al., 2009, 3D polycaprolactone
scaffolds with controlled pore structure using a rapid
Not applicable. prototyping system. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 20: 229–234.

Consent for publication https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3573-4
11. Gleadall A, Visscher D, Yang J, et al., 2018, Review of additive
Not applicable.
manufactured tissue engineering scaffolds: Relationship
Availability of data between geometry and performance. Burn Trauma, 6: 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-018-0121-4
Not applicable.
12. Yannas IV, Lee E, Orgill DP, et al., 1989, Synthesis and
References characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces
partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. Proc Natl
1. O’Brien FJ, 2011, Biomaterials a amp; scaffolds for tissue Acad Sci U S A, 86: 933–937.
engineering. Mater Today, 14: 88–95.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.3.933
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X
13. Zhong SP, Zhang YZ, Lim CT, 2010, Tissue scaffolds for
2. Loh QL, Choong C, 2013, Three-dimensional scaffolds for skin wound healing and dermal reconstruction. WIREs
tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore Nanomed Nanobiotechnol, 2: 510–525.
size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 19: 485–502.
https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.100
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437
14. Kus KJ, Ruiz ES, 2020, Wound dressings–a practical review.
3. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Waller MA, et al., 2006, The effect Curr Dermatol Rep, 9: 298–308.
of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen
scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technol Heal Care, 15: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-020-00319-w
https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2007-15102 15. Dabiri G, Damstetter E, Phillips T, 2016, Choosing a wound
dressing based on common wound characteristics. Adv
4. Perez RA, Mestres G, 2016, Role of pore size and morphology Wound Care, 5: 32–41.
in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C
Mater Biol Appl, 61: 922–939. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2014.0586
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.087 16. Lindholm C, Searle R, 2016, Wound management for the
21 century: Combining effectiveness and efficiency. Int
st
5. Sobral JM, Caridade SG, Sousa RA, et al., 2011, Three- Wound J, 13: 5–15.
dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size
gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12623
performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomater, 17. Kröger K, Jöster M, 2018, Prevalence of chronic wounds in
7: 1009–1018. different modalities of care in Germany. EWMA J, 19: 45–49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003 18. Sen CK, 2021, Human wound and its burden: Updated 2020
6. Sheikholeslam M, Wright ME, Jeschke MG, et al., 2018, compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care, 10: 281–292.
Biomaterials for skin substitutes. Adv Healthc Mater, https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0026
7: 1700897.
19. Posnett J, Gottrup F, Lundgren H, et al., 2009, The resource
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700897 impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe. J
Wound Care, 18: 154–154.
7. Phelps EA, García AJ, 2010, Engineering more than a cell:
Vascularization strategies in tissue engineering. Curr Opin https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2009.18.4.41607
Biotechnol, 21: 704–709.
20. Powers JG, Higham C, Broussard K, et al., 2016, Wound healing
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.06.005 and treating wounds. J Am Acad Dermatol, 74: 607–625.
8. Negut I, Dorcioman G, Grumezescu V, 2020, Scaffolds for https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.070
wound healing applications. Polymers (Basel), 12: 1–19.
21. Nichols E, 2015, Wound assessment Part 1: How to measure
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092010 a wound. Wound Essent, 10: 51–55.
9. Gauvin R, Chen YC, Lee JW, et al., 2012, Khademhosseini, 22. Lucas Y, Niri R, Treuillet S, et al., 2021, Castaneda, Wound
Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering size imaging: Ready for smart assessment and monitoring.

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 36 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.650