Page 305 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting as a prospective therapeutic strategy for LSCD

pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). PLoS One, 8:e77673. Rheological properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 4:
1963–1973.
55. Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R, et al., 2019, 3D printing of
personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and 70. Gouveia RM, Koudouna E, Jester J, et al., 2017, Template
hearts. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6:1900344. curvature influences cell alignment to create improved
human corneal tissue equivalents. Adv Biosyst, 1:1700135.
56. Meinhardt A, Eberle D, Tazaki A, et al., 2014, 3D
reconstitution of the patterned neural tube from embryonic 71. Lai J-Y, Cheng H-Y, Ma DH-K, 2015, Investigation of
stem cells. Stem Cell Rep, 3:987–999. overrun-processed porous hyaluronic acid carriers in corneal
endothelial tissue engineering. PLoS One, 10:e0136067.
57. Ahn SH, Lee HJ, Lee J-S, et al., 2015, A novel cell-printing
method and its application to hepatogenic differentiation 72. Chen D, Qu Y, Hua X, et al., 2017, A hyaluronan hydrogel
of human adipose stem cell-embedded mesh structures. Sci scaffold-based xeno-free culture system for ex vivo expansion
Rep, 5:13427. of human corneal epithelial stem cells. Eye, 31:962–971.
58. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Dietrich T, Saito K, et al., 2007, 73. Madden PW, Lai JNX, George KA, et al., 2011, Human
Characterization of extracellular matrix components in corneal endothelial cell growth on a silk fibroin membrane.
the limbal epithelial stem cell compartment. Exp Eye Res, Biomaterials, 32:4076–4084.
85:845–860.
74. Tummala GK, Lopes VR, Mihranyan A, et al., 2019,
59. Polisetti N, Zenkel M, Menzel-Severing J, et al., 2016, Cell Biocompatibility of nanocellulose-reinforced PVA hydrogel
adhesion molecules and stem cell-niche-interactions in the with human corneal epithelial cells for ophthalmic
limbal stem cell niche. Stem Cells, 34:203–219. applications. J Funct Biomater, 10:35.
60. Mei H, Gonzalez S, Deng SX, 2012, Extracellular matrix is 75. Wilson SL, Sidney LE, Dunphy SE, et al., 2013, Keeping
an important component of limbal stem cell niche. J Funct an eye on decellularized corneas: A review of methods,
Biomater, 3:879–894. characterization and applications. J Funct Biomater,
4:114–161.
61. Cotsarelis G, Cheng S-Z, Dong G, et al., 1989, Existence
of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be 76. Lee Y-P, Liu H-Y, Lin P-C, et al., 2019, Facile fabrication
preferentially stimulated to proliferate: Implications on of superporous and biocompatible hydrogel scaffolds for
epithelial stem cells. Cell, 57:201–209. artificial corneal periphery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces,
175:26–35.
62. Ebato B, Friend J, Thoft RA, 1988, Comparison of limbal
and peripheral human corneal epithelium in tissue culture. 77. Ma X-Y, Bao H-J, Cui L, et al., 2013, The graft of autologous
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 29:1533–1537. adipose-derived stem cells in the corneal stromal after
mechanic damage. PLoS One, 8:e76103.
63. Zhang B, Xue Q, Hu H, et al., 2019 integrated 3D bioprinting-
based geometry-control strategy for fabricating corneal 78. Kim EY, Tripathy N, Cho SA, et al., 2017, Collagen type I–
substitutes. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 20:945–959. PLGA film as an efficient substratum for corneal endothelial
cells regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regener Med, 11:2471–2478.
64. Sorkio A, Koch L, Koivusalo L, et al., 2018, Human stem
cell based corneal tissue mimicking structures using laser- 79. Kobayashi H, 2006, PVA-HAp nanocomposites for artificial
assisted 3D bioprinting and functional bioinks. Biomaterials, cornea. Adv Sci Technol, 53:9–16.
171:57–71.
80. Jiang H, Zuo Y, Zhang L, et al., 2014, Property-based design:
65. Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ, 2018, 3D bioprinting of a Optimization and characterization of polyvinyl alcohol
corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res, 173:188–193. (PVA) hydrogel and PVA-matrix composite for artificial
cornea. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 25:941–952.
66. Duarte Campos DF, Rohde M, Ross M, et al., 2019, Corneal
bioprinting utilizing collagen-based bioinks and primary 81. Sinha M, Gupte T, 2018, Design and evaluation of artificial
human keratocytes. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 107(9):1945– cornea with core–skirt design using polyhydroxyethyl
1953. methacrylate and graphite. Int Ophthalmol, 38:1225–1233.
67. Liu W, Deng C, McLaughlin CR, et al., 2009, Collagen– 82. Merrett K, Griffith CM, Deslandes Y, et al., 2001, Adhesion
phosphorylcholine interpenetrating network hydrogels as of corneal epithelial cells to cell adhesion peptide modified
corneal substitutes. Biomaterials, 30:1551–1559. pHEMA surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 12:647–671.
68. Niu G, Choi J-S, Wang Z, et al., 2014, Heparin-modified 83. Tanioka H, Kawasaki S, Yamasaki K, et al., 2006,
gelatin scaffolds for human corneal endothelial cell Establishment of a cultivated human conjunctival
transplantation. Biomaterials, 35:4005–4014. epithelium as an alternative tissue source for autologous
corneal epithelial transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,
69. Ionescu A-M, Alaminos M, Cardona J de la C, et al.,
2011, Investigating a novel nanostructured fibrin– 47:3820–3827.
agarose biomaterial for human cornea tissue engineering: 84. Builles N, Janin-Manificat H, Malbouyres M, et al., 2010,

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 297 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.710