Page 346 - IJB-9-3
P. 346

International Journal of Bioprinting                       Amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction



            Ethics approval and consent to participate         7.   Dehghai S, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Ghasemi H, et al., 2018,
                                                                  3D-printed membrane as an alternative to amniotic membrane
            This study was approved by the institutional review board of   for ocular surface/conjunctival defect reconstruction: An
            Henan Eye Hospital (Permit number: HNEEC-2022(53)).   in vitro & in vivo study. Biomaterials, 174:95–112.
            The institutional review board approved a retrospective   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.013
            medical review of the patients who underwent AFR and
            suture AMT (SAMT) for various ocular surface injuries   8.   Zhang B, Cristescu R, Chrisey DB,  et  al., 2020, Solvent-
            between January 2019 and July 2022. Only patients with   based extrusion 3D printing for the fabrication of tissue
            follow-up ≥ 2 weeks after AM were included. All patients   engineering scaffolds. Int J Bioprint, 6(1):211.
            signed the informed consent form, and the permission was   https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.211
            obtained from  each of the  subjects  to participate in the   9.   Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV, 2019, Polylactic acid:
            study                                                 Synthesis  and biomedical  applications.  J Appl Microbiol,
                                                                  127(6):1612–1626.
            Consent for publication                               https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14290

            All patients signed the written informed consent form, and   10.  Ma KN, Thanos A, Chodosh J, et al., 2016, A novel technique
            the permission was obtained from each of the subjects to   for amniotic membrane transplantation in patients with
            publish their data and images.                        acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Ocul Surf, 14(1):31–36.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2015.07.002
            Availability of data                               11.  Clare G, Suleman H, Bunce C,  et al., 2012, Amniotic
            All data that support the findings of this study have been   membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns. Cochrane
                                                                  Database Syst Rev, 2012(9):CD009379.
            included in the article.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009379.pub2
            References                                         12.  Lange C, Feltgen N, Junker B,  et al., 2009, Resolving the
                                                                  clinical  acuity  categories  “hand  motion”  and  “counting
            1.   Mamede  AC,  Carvalho  MJ, Abrantes AM,  et al., 2012,   fingers” using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).
               Amniotic membrane: From structure and functions to   Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 247(1):137–142.
               clinical applications. Cell Tissue Res, 349(2):447–458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0926-0
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1424-6       13.  Roper-Hall MJ, 1965, Thermal and chemical burns. Trans
            2.   Finger PT, Jain P, Mukkamala SK, 2019, Super-thick   Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962), 85:631–53.
               amniotic membrane graft for ocular surface reconstruction.   14.  Dua HS, King AJ, Joseph A, 2001, A new classification of
               Am J Ophthalmol, 198:45–53.                        ocular surface burns. Br J Ophthalmol, 85(11):1379–1383.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.035          https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.11.1379
            3.   Sangwan VS, Burman S, Tejwani S, et al., 2007, Amniotic   15.  Shanbhag SS, Hall L, Chodosh J,  et al., 2020, Long-term
               membrane transplantation: A review of current indications   outcomes of amniotic membrane treatment in acute
               in the management of ophthalmic disorders.  Indian  J   Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ocul
               Ophthalmol, 55(4):251–260.                         Surf, 18(3):517–522.
               https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.33036            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2020.03.004
                                                               16.  Kheirkhah A, Blanco G, Casas V,  et al., 2008, Surgical
            4.   Morkin MI, Hamrah P, 2018, Efficacy of self-retained
               cryopreserved amniotic membrane for treatment of   strategies for fornix reconstruction based on symblepharon
               neuropathic corneal pain. Ocul Surf, 16(1):132–138.  severity. Am J Ophthalmol, 146(2):266–275.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.028
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.10.003
                                                               17.  Sharma N, Singh D, Sobti A, et al., 2012, Course and
            5.   Zhou TE, Robert MC, 2022, Comparing ProKera with   outcome of accidental sodium hydroxide ocular injury. Am J
               amniotic membrane transplantation: Indications, outcomes,   Ophthalmol, 154(4):740.e2–749.e2.
               and costs. Cornea, 41(7):840–844.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.018
               https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002852
                                                               18.  Liu BQ, Wang ZC, Liu LM, et al., 2008, Sutureless fixation of
            6.   Mei Y, He C, Gao C, et al., 2021, 3D-printed degradable anti-  amniotic membrane patch as a therapeutic contact lens by
               tumor scaffolds for controllable drug delivery. Int J Bioprint,   using a polymethyl methacrylate ring and fibrin sealant in a
               7(4):418.                                          rabbit model. Cornea, 27(1):74–79.
               https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.418              https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318156cb08


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        338                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.713
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351