Page 346 - IJB-9-3
P. 346
International Journal of Bioprinting Amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
Ethics approval and consent to participate 7. Dehghai S, Rasoulianboroujeni M, Ghasemi H, et al., 2018,
3D-printed membrane as an alternative to amniotic membrane
This study was approved by the institutional review board of for ocular surface/conjunctival defect reconstruction: An
Henan Eye Hospital (Permit number: HNEEC-2022(53)). in vitro & in vivo study. Biomaterials, 174:95–112.
The institutional review board approved a retrospective https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.013
medical review of the patients who underwent AFR and
suture AMT (SAMT) for various ocular surface injuries 8. Zhang B, Cristescu R, Chrisey DB, et al., 2020, Solvent-
between January 2019 and July 2022. Only patients with based extrusion 3D printing for the fabrication of tissue
follow-up ≥ 2 weeks after AM were included. All patients engineering scaffolds. Int J Bioprint, 6(1):211.
signed the informed consent form, and the permission was https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.211
obtained from each of the subjects to participate in the 9. Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV, 2019, Polylactic acid:
study Synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol,
127(6):1612–1626.
Consent for publication https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14290
All patients signed the written informed consent form, and 10. Ma KN, Thanos A, Chodosh J, et al., 2016, A novel technique
the permission was obtained from each of the subjects to for amniotic membrane transplantation in patients with
publish their data and images. acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Ocul Surf, 14(1):31–36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2015.07.002
Availability of data 11. Clare G, Suleman H, Bunce C, et al., 2012, Amniotic
All data that support the findings of this study have been membrane transplantation for acute ocular burns. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev, 2012(9):CD009379.
included in the article.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009379.pub2
References 12. Lange C, Feltgen N, Junker B, et al., 2009, Resolving the
clinical acuity categories “hand motion” and “counting
1. Mamede AC, Carvalho MJ, Abrantes AM, et al., 2012, fingers” using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).
Amniotic membrane: From structure and functions to Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 247(1):137–142.
clinical applications. Cell Tissue Res, 349(2):447–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0926-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1424-6 13. Roper-Hall MJ, 1965, Thermal and chemical burns. Trans
2. Finger PT, Jain P, Mukkamala SK, 2019, Super-thick Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962), 85:631–53.
amniotic membrane graft for ocular surface reconstruction. 14. Dua HS, King AJ, Joseph A, 2001, A new classification of
Am J Ophthalmol, 198:45–53. ocular surface burns. Br J Ophthalmol, 85(11):1379–1383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.035 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.11.1379
3. Sangwan VS, Burman S, Tejwani S, et al., 2007, Amniotic 15. Shanbhag SS, Hall L, Chodosh J, et al., 2020, Long-term
membrane transplantation: A review of current indications outcomes of amniotic membrane treatment in acute
in the management of ophthalmic disorders. Indian J Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ocul
Ophthalmol, 55(4):251–260. Surf, 18(3):517–522.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.33036 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2020.03.004
16. Kheirkhah A, Blanco G, Casas V, et al., 2008, Surgical
4. Morkin MI, Hamrah P, 2018, Efficacy of self-retained
cryopreserved amniotic membrane for treatment of strategies for fornix reconstruction based on symblepharon
neuropathic corneal pain. Ocul Surf, 16(1):132–138. severity. Am J Ophthalmol, 146(2):266–275.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.03.028
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.10.003
17. Sharma N, Singh D, Sobti A, et al., 2012, Course and
5. Zhou TE, Robert MC, 2022, Comparing ProKera with outcome of accidental sodium hydroxide ocular injury. Am J
amniotic membrane transplantation: Indications, outcomes, Ophthalmol, 154(4):740.e2–749.e2.
and costs. Cornea, 41(7):840–844.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.04.018
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002852
18. Liu BQ, Wang ZC, Liu LM, et al., 2008, Sutureless fixation of
6. Mei Y, He C, Gao C, et al., 2021, 3D-printed degradable anti- amniotic membrane patch as a therapeutic contact lens by
tumor scaffolds for controllable drug delivery. Int J Bioprint, using a polymethyl methacrylate ring and fibrin sealant in a
7(4):418. rabbit model. Cornea, 27(1):74–79.
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.418 https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318156cb08
Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 338 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.713

