Page 365 - IJB-9-3
P. 365

International Journal of Bioprinting                     Decellularized  materials for bioprinting of liver constructs



               facilitate hepatitis B virus infection. J Biomed Mater Res A,   132. Khati V, Ramachandraiah H, Pati F,  et al., 2022, 3D
               107(8):1744–1753.                                  bioprinting  of  multi-material  decellularized  liver  matrix
                                                                  hydrogel at physiological temperatures. Biosensors (Basel),
               https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36690
                                                                  12:521.
            122. Mazza G, Rombouts K, et al., 2015, Decellularized human
               liver as a natural 3D-scaffold for liver bioengineering and   https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12070521
               transplantation. Sci Rep, 5:13079.              133. Zhou G, Jiang H, Yin Z, et al., 2018, In vitro regeneration
               https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13079                  of patient-specific ear-shaped cartilage and its first clinical
                                                                  application for auricular reconstruction.  EBioMedicine,
            123. Mazza G, Al-Akkad W, Telese A, et al., 2017, Rapid production   28:287–302.
               of  human  liver  scaffolds  for  functional  tissue  engineering
               by high shear stress oscillation-decellularization.  Sci Rep,   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.011
               7:5534.                                         134. Raya-Rivera AM, Esquiliano D, Fierro-Pastrana R,  et al.,
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05134-1         2014, Tissue-engineered autologous vaginal organs in
                                                                  patients: A pilot cohort study. Lancet, 384: 329–336.
            124. Skardal A, Devarasetty M, Kang H-W, et al., 2015, A hydrogel
               bioink toolkit for mimicking native tissue biochemical and   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60542-0
               mechanical properties in bioprinted tissue constructs. Acta   135. Zopf DA, Hollister SJ, Nelson ME, et al., 2013, Bioresorbable
               Biomater, 25:24–34.                                airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer.  N
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.030       Engl J Med, 368:2043–2045.
            125. Lee H, Han W, Kim H, et al., 2017, Development of liver   https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1206319
               decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three-  136. Poel WE, 1948, Preparation of acellular homogenates from
               dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering.   muscle samples. Science, 108:390–391.
               Biomacromolecules, 18:1229–1237.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.108.2806.390-a
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01908
                                                               137. Hjelle JT, Carlson EC, Brendel K, et al., 1979, Biosynthesis of
            126. Yu C, Ma X, Zhu W, et al., 2019, Scanningless and continuous   basement membrane matrix by isolated rat renal glomeruli.
               3D bioprinting of human tissues with decellularized   Kidney Int, 15:20–32.
               extracellular matrix. Biomaterials, 194:1–13.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1979.3
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.12.009
                                                               138. Badylak SF, Tullius R, Kokini K,  et  al., 1995, The use of
            127. Kim  MK, Jeong  W, Lee SM,  et al.,  2020, Decellularized
               extracellular matrix-based bio-ink with enhanced 3D   xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa as a biomaterial for
               printability and mechanical properties.  Biofabrication,   Achilles tendon repair in a dog model. J Biomed Mater Res,
               12:025003.                                         29:977–985.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab5d80           https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290809
            128. Lewis PL, Yan M, Su J, et al., 2019, Directing the growth and   139. Ott HC, Matthiesen TS, Goh SK,  et al., 2008, Perfusion-
               alignment of biliary epithelium within extracellular matrix   decellularized matrix: Using nature’s platform to engineer a
               hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 85:84–93.                bioartificial heart. Nat Med, 14:213–221.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.039       https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1684
            129. Lee H, Chae S, Kim JY, et al., 2019, Cell-printed 3D liver-  140. Ott HC, Clippinger B, Conrad C, et al., 2010, Regeneration
               on-a-chip possessing a liver microenvironment and biliary   and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung.  Nat
               system. Biofabrication, 11:025001.                 Med, 16:927–933.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaf9fa           https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2193
            130. Mao Q, Wang Y, Li Y,  et al., 2020, Fabrication of liver   141. Petersen TH, Calle EA, Zhao L,  et al., 2010, Tissue-
               microtissue with liver decellularized extracellular matrix   engineered  lungs  for  in  vivo  implantation.  Science,  329:
               (dECM) bioink by digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting.   538–541.
               Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 109:110625.       https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189345
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110625      142. Uygun BE, Soto-Gutierrez AS, Yagi H, et al., 2010, Organ
            131. Jeong W, Kim MK, Kang HW, 2021, Effect of detergent type   reengineering through development of a transplantable
               on the performance of liver decellularized extracellular   recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix.
               matrix-based bio-inks. J Tissue Eng, 12:2041731421997091.  Nat Med, 16:814–820.
               https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731421997091           https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2170


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        357                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.714
   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370