Page 385 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-printed anistropic meniscus

10: 5090–5106. extracellular matrix hydrogels and their effects on cell-
matrix interactions of fibrochondrocytes. Biomed Mater,
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.44270
17: 014105.
96. Pillai MM, Gopinathan J, Kumar RS, et al., 2018, Tissue
engineering of human knee meniscus using functionalized https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ac4178
and reinforced silk-polyvinyl alcohol composite three- 106. Zhong G, Yao J, Huang X, et al., 2020, Injectable ECM
dimensional scaffolds: Understanding the in vitro and hydrogel for delivery of BMSCs enabled full-thickness
in vivo behavior. J Biomed Mater Res A, 106: 1722–1731. meniscus repair in an orthotopic rat model. Bioact Mater,
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36372 5: 871–879.
97. Spang MT, Christman KL, 2018, Extracellular matrix https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.06.008
hydrogel therapies: In vivo applications and development. 107. Guo W, Chen M, Wang Z, et al., 2021, 3D-printed cell-free
Acta Biomater, 68: 1–14. PCL-MECM scaffold with biomimetic micro-structure
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.019 and micro-environment to enhance in situ meniscus
regeneration. Bioact Mater, 6: 3620–3633.
98. Hu X, Xia Z, Cai K, 2022, Recent advances in 3D hydrogel
culture systems for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.019
and cell behavior regulation. J Mater Chem B, 10: 1486–1507. 108. Vassiliou G, 1986, Current concepts of cervical fractures
https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TB02537F of the teeth and their treatment. Stomatologia (Athenai),
43: 399–411.
99. Yu Z, Lili J, Tiezheng Z, et al., 2019, Development of
decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix and gelatin/ 109. Rothrauff BB, Shimomura K, Gottardi R, et al., 2017,
chitosan scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering. Biomed Anatomical region-dependent enhancement of
Mater Eng, 30: 125–132. 3-dimensional chondrogenic differentiation of human
mesenchymal stem cells by soluble meniscus extracellular
https://doi.org/10.3233/bme-191038 matrix. Acta Biomater, 49: 140–151.
100. Gao S, Guo W, Chen M, et al., 2017, Fabrication and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.046
characterization of electrospun nanofibers composed
of decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix and 110. Zhang CY, Fu CP, Li XY, et al., 2022, Three-dimensional
polycaprolactone for meniscus tissue engineering. J Mater bioprinting of decellularized extracellular matrix-based
Chem B, 5: 2273–2285. bioinks for tissue engineering. Molecules, 27: 3442.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tb03299k https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27113442
101. Shimomura K, Rothrauff BB, Tuan RS, 2017, Region-specific 111. Szojka A, Lalh K, Andrews SH, et al., 2017, Biomimetic
effect of the decellularized meniscus extracellular matrix on 3D printed scaffolds for meniscus tissue engineering.
mesenchymal stem cell-based meniscus tissue engineering. Bioprinting, 8: 1–7.
Am J Sports Med, 45: 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2017.08.001
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516674184 112. Sooriyaarachchi D, Wu J, Feng A, et al., 2019, Hybrid
102. Gao S, Yuan Z, Guo W, et al., 2017, Comparison of fabrication of biomimetic meniscus scaffold by 3D printing
glutaraldehyde and carbodiimides to crosslink tissue and parallel electrospinning. Proc Manuf, 34: 528–534.
engineering scaffolds fabricated by decellularized porcine https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.216
menisci. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 71: 891–900.
113. Lan X, Ma Z, Szojka AR, et al., 2021, TEMPO-oxidized
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.074 cellulose nanofiber-alginate hydrogel as a bioink for human
103. Sun Y, Zhang Y, Wu Q, et al., 2021, 3D-bioprinting ready-to- meniscus tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol,
implant anisotropic menisci recapitulate healthy meniscus 9: 766399.
phenotype and prevent secondary joint degeneration. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.766399
Theranostics, 11: 5160–5173.
114. Costa JB, Park J, Jorgensen AM, et al., 2020, 3D
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.54864 bioprinted highly elastic hybrid constructs for advanced
104. Xia B, Kim DH, Bansal S, et al., 2021, Development of fibrocartilaginous tissue regeneration. Chem Mater,
a decellularized meniscus matrix-based nanofibrous 32: 8733–8746.
scaffold for meniscus tissue engineering. Acta Biomater, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03556
128: 175–185.
115. Jian Z, Zhuang T, Qinyu T, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.074
a biomimetic meniscal scaffold for application in tissue
105. Wu J, Xu J, Huang Y, et al., 2021, Regional-specific meniscal engineering. Bioact Mater, 6: 1711–1726.

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 377 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.693