Page 358 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting with machine learning

deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide 82. Guan J, You S, Xiang Y, et al., 2021, Compensating the cell-
detection[J]. Remote Sens, 11(2):196. induced light scattering effect in light-based bioprinting
using deep learning. Biofabrication, 14(1):015011.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020196
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac3b92
72. Khan A, Sohail A, Zahoora U, et al., 2020, A survey of the
recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks. 83. Bone JM, Childs CM, Menon A, et al., 2020, Hierarchical
Artif Intell Rev, 53(8):5455–5516. machine learning for high-fidelity 3D printed biopolymers.
ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 6(12):7021–7031.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09825-6
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00755
73. Reina-Romo E, Mandal S, Amorim P, et al., 2021, Towards
the experimentally-informed in silico nozzle design 84. Shi J, Song J, Song B, et al., 2019, Multi-objective optimization
optimization for extrusion-based bioprinting of shear- design through machine learning for drop-on-demand
thinning hydrogels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9:701778. bioprinting. Engineering, 5(3):586–593.
74. Allencherry J, Pradeep N, Shrivastava R, et al., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.12.009
Investigation of hydrogel and gelatin bath formulations 85. Shi J, Wu B, Song B, et al., 2018, Learning-based cell
for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting using deep learning. injection control for precise drop-on-demand cell printing.
Procedia CIRP, 110:360–365. Ann Biomed Eng, 46(9):1267–1279.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.06.064 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2054-2
75. Xu H, Liu Q, Casillas J, et al., 2022, Prediction of cell 86. Fu Z, Angeline V, Sun W, 2021, Evaluation of printing
viability in dynamic optical projection stereolithography- parameters on 3D extrusion printing of pluronic hydrogels
based bioprinting using machine learning. J Intell Manuf, and machine learning guided parameter recommendation.
33(4):995–1005. Int J Bioprint, 7(4):434.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01708-5 87. Tian S, Stevens R, McInnes BT, et al., 2021, Machine assisted
experimentation of extrusion-based bioprinting systems.
76. Wu D, Xu C, 2018, Predictive modeling of droplet formation Micromachines, 12(7):780.
processes in inkjet-based bioprinting. J Manuf Sci E-T Asme,
140(10):101007. 88. Ruberu K, Senadeera M, Rana S, et al., 2021, Coupling machine
learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040619 extrusion printing. Appl Mater Today, 22:100914.
77. Lee J, Oh SJ, An SH, et al., 2020, Machine learning-based https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100914
design strategy for 3D printable bioink: Elastic modulus
and yield stress determine printability. Biofabrication, 89. Jin Z, Zhang Z, Shao X, et al., 2021, Monitoring anomalies
12(3):035018. in 3D bioprinting with deep neural networks. ACS Biomater
Sci Eng.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8707
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01761
78. Yamanishi C, Parigoris E, Takayama S, 2020, Kinetic
analysis of label-free microscale collagen gel contraction 90. Bonatti AF, Vozzi G, Kai Chua C, et al., 2022, A deep
using machine learning-aided image analysis. Front Bioeng learning approach for error detection and quantification in
Biotechnol, 8:582602. extrusion-based bioprinting. Mater Today, 70:131–135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.006
79. Tourlomousis F, Jia C, Karydis T, et al., 2019, Machine
learning metrology of cell confinement in melt electrowritten 91. Tebon PJ, Wang B, Markowitz AL, et al., 2022, Drug
three-dimensional biomaterial substrates. Microsyst screening at single-organoid resolution via bioprinting and
Nanoeng, 5(1):1–19. interferometry. bioRxiv, 2021:2021–2031.
80. Safir F, Vu N, Tadesse LF, et al., 2022, Detecting bacteria 92. Tröndle K, Miotto G, Rizzo L, et al., 2022, Deep learning-
in multi-cellular samples with combined acoustic assisted nephrotoxicity testing with bioprinted renal
bioprinting and Raman spectroscopy. arXiv preprint spheroids. Int J Bioprint, 8(2):528.
arXiv:2206.09304.
81. Nadernezhad A, Groll J, 2022, Machine learning reveals a
general understanding of printability in formulations based
on rheology additives. Adv Sci, 9(29):2202638.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202202638

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 350 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.739