Page 373 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting A computational model of cell viability and proliferation of 3D-bioprinted constructs

Consent for publication Progress and challenges in clinical practice. Int J Environ Res
Public Health, 18(20): 10806.
Not applicable.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010806
Availability of data 10. Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al. 2016, Analytic models of oxygen and
nutrient diffusion, metabolism dynamics, and architecture
Not applicable. optimization in three-dimensional tissue constructs
with applications and insights in cerebral organoids.
Further disclosure Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 22(3): 221–249.
Part of this work was delivered as an oral presentation at https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2015.0375
the fifth International Conference on Biomaterials and
Nanomaterials, March 10, 2022, Microsoft Teams. 11. Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al., 2017, Direct 3D bioprinting
of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex
microarchitecture. Biomaterials, 124: 106–115.
References
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042
1. Ng WL, Chua CK., Shen YF, 2019, Print me an organ! 12. Ehsan SM, George SC, 2013, Nonsteady state oxygen
Why we are not there yet. Progr Polym Sci, 97: 101–145. transport in engineered tissue: Implications for design.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145 Tissue Eng Part A, 19(11–12): 1433–1442.
2. Dey M, Ozbolat IT, 2020, 3D bioprinting of cells, tissues and https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0587
organs. Sci Rep, 10(1): 14023.
13. Magliaro C, Mattei G, Iacoangeli F, et al., 2019, Oxygen
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70086-y consumption characteristics in 3D constructs depend on
3. Santoni S, Gugliandolo SG, Sponchioni M, et al., 2022, cell density. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 7: 251.
3D bioprinting: Current status and trends—A guide to https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00251
the literature and industrial practice. Bio-Des Manuf, 5(1):
14–42. 14. Jin H, Lei J, 2014, A mathematical model of cell population
dynamics with autophagy response to starvation. Math
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-021-00165-0 Biosci, 258: 1–10.
4. Alexander AE, Wake N, Chepelev L, et al., 2021, A guideline https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2014.08.014
for 3D printing terminology in biomedical research utilizing
ISO/ASTM standards. 3D Print Med, 7(1): 8. 15. Vogels M, Zoeckler R, Stasiw DM, et al., 1975, P.F.
Verhulst’s ‘Notice sur la loi que la populations suit dans
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00098-5
son accroissement’ from Correspondence Mathematique.
5. Moroni L, Boland T, Burdock JA, et al., 2018, Biofabrication: Ghent, X:1838. J Biol Phys 3: 183–192.
A guide to technology and terminology. Trends Biotechnol,
36(4): 384–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02309004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015 16. Ward JP, King JR, 1997, Mathematical modelling of
avascular-tumour growth. [Online].
6. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances and
future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. https://academic.oup.com/imammb/article/14/1/39/660000
Biomaterials, 76: 321–343. 17. Kiran KL, Jayachandran D, Lakshminarayanan S, 2009,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076 Mathematical modelling of avascular tumour growth based
on diffusion of nutrients and its validation. Can J Chem Eng,
7. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al., 2022, Controlling 87(5): 732–740.
droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: Key factors to
achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.20204
bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 8(1): 1–17.
18. Tindall MJ, Please CP, Peddie MJ, 2008, Modelling the
https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.V8I1.424 formation of necrotic regions in avascular tumours. Math
8. Long WL, Lee JM, Zhou M et al., 2020, Vat polymerization- Biosci, 211(1): 34–55.
based bioprinting—Process, materials, applications and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2007.09.002
regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12(2): 022001.
19. Fritz M, Lima EABF, Nikolić V, et al., 2019, Local and nonlocal
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034 phase-field models of tumor growth and invasion due to ECM
9. Piazza DE, Pandolfi E, Cacciotti I, et al., 2021, Bioprinting degradation. Math Models Methods Appl Sci, 29(13): 2433–2468.
technology in skin, heart, pancreas and cartilage tissues: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202519500519

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 365 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.741