Page 22 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printed edible bird’s nests

23. Zhang A, Sun H, Wang X, 2012, Serum metabolomics as a 33. Zhang F, Zheng L, Cheng S, et al., 2019, Comparison of the
novel diagnostic approach for disease: A systematic review. interactions of different growth factors and glycosaminoglycans.
Anal Bioanal Chem, 404(4):1239–1245. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 24(18):3360.
24. Zelena E, Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, et al., 2009, Development 34. Xu X, Jha AK, Harrington DA, et al., 2012, Hyaluronic acid-
of a robust and repeatable UPLC− MS method for the long- based hydrogels: From a natural polysaccharide to complex
term metabolomic study of human serum. Anal Chem, networks. Soft Matter, 8(12):3280–3294.
81(4):1357–1364. 35. China Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, 2020, Bird’s
25. Tabatabaei F, Moharamzadeh K, Tayebi L, 2020, Fibroblast nest product certification implementation rules, CAIQ-
encapsulation in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) versus RZ-2015002-7, amended March 16, 2020, Chinese Bird’s Nest
collagen hydrogel as substrates for oral mucosa tissue Traceability Management Service Platform, viewed July 07,
engineering. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 10(4):573–577. 2022.
26. PT, JB, 2020, Bioprinting Protocol: CELLINK GelMA, 36. Chye SM, Tai SK, Koh RY, et al., 2017, A mini review on
viewed July 07, 2022, https://www.cellink.com/wp-content/ medicinal effects of edible bird’s nest. Lett Health Biol Sci,
uploads/2022/03/Bioprinting-protocol-GelMA_18- 2(1):65–67.
Dec-2020-5.pdf 37. Yida Zhang, Imam MU, Ismail M, et al., 2015, Edible
27. Ouyang L, et al., 2016, Effect of bioink properties on bird’s nest attenuates high fat diet-induced oxidative stress
printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic and inflammation via regulation of hepatic antioxidant
stem cells. Biofabrication, 8(3):035020. and inflammatory genes. BMC Complement Altern Med,
15(1):310.
28. Thiemann RF, Varney S, Moskwa N, et al., 2021, Regulation
of myoepithelial differentiation in 3-dimensional culture. 38. Yida zhang, Iman MU, Ismail M, et al., 2015, Edible bird’s
bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.28.450182. nest prevents high fat diet-induced insulin resistance in rats.
J Diabetes Res, 2015:760535.
29. Shin HS, Hong HJ, Koh WG, et al., 2018, Organotypic 39. Chok KC, Ng MG, Ng KY, et al., 2021, Edible bird’s nest:
3D culture in nanoscaffold microwells supports salivary recent updates and industry insights based on laboratory
gland stem-cell-based organization. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, findings. Front Pharmacol, 12:746656.
4(12):4311–4320.
40. Ben-Arye T, Shandalov Y, Ben-Shaul S, et al., 2020, Textured
30. Petrakova OS, Terskikh VV, Echernioglo ES, et al., 2014, soy protein scaffolds enable the generation of three-
Comparative analysis reveals similarities between cultured dimensional bovine skeletal muscle tissue for cell-based
submandibular salivary gland cells and liver progenitor meat. Nat Food, 1(4):210–220.
cells. Springerplus, 3:183.
41. Guardian T, 2020, No-kill, lab-grown meat to go on sale for
31. Hintze V, Schnabelrauch M, Rother S, 2022, Chemical first time. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/
modification of hyaluronan and their biomedical environment/2020/dec/02/no-kill-lab-grown-meat-to-go-
applications. Front Chem, 10:830671. on-sale-for-first-time
32. Macri L, Silverstein D, Clark RAF, 2007, Growth factor 42. Organisms E.P.o.G.M., 2011, Guidance on the risk assessment
binding to the pericellular matrix and its importance in of genetically modified microorganisms and their products
tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 59(13):1366–1381. intended for food and feed use. EFSA J, 9(6):2193.

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 14 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.691