Page 413 - IJB-9-5
P. 413

International Journal of Bioprinting                         3D-printed Mg scaffolds promote bone defect repair



            Table 1. Primer sequences for RT-qPCR
             Gene               Forward primer sequence (5’-3’)        Reverse primer sequence (5’-3’)
             GAPDH1             CTGGAGAAACCTGCCAAGTATG                 GGTGGAAGAATGGGAGTTGCT
             Alpl               CGGCACCTGCCTTACCAACT                   ACTGTGGAGACGCCCATACC
             Spp1               GATGAACAGTATCCCGATGCCA                 GTCTTCCCGTTGCTGTCCTGA
             Runx2              CAGTATGAGAGTAGGTGTCCCGC                AAGAGGGGTAAGACTGGTCATAGG
             Col1a1             CGTGGAAACCTGATGTATGCTTG                CCTATGACTTCTGCGTCTGGTGA
             SP7                CTGGGAAAAGGAGGCACAAAGA                 GGGGAAAGGGTGGGTAGTCATT
             Bglap              AGGGCAGTAAGGTGGTGAATAGA                GAAGCCAATGTGGTCCGCTA
             GAPDH2             CCTCGTCCCGTAGACAAAATG                  TGAGGTCAATGAAGGGGTCGT
             C-Fos              CGAAGGAACGGAATAAGATG                   TGGGAAGCCAAGGTCATCG
             Acp5               CACGATGCCAGCGACAAGA                    TGAAGCGCAAACGGTAGTAAGG
             CTSK               GTTGACTTCCGCAATCCTTACC                 CAGCAGAAACTTGAACACCCAC
             Nfatc1             CACTCCACCCACTTCTGACTTCC                GGCTGCCTTCCGTCTCATAGTG
             Calcr              CAACCGAACCTGGTCCAACTAT                 GACAAGGAGTGACCCACAAGAG
             MMP9               GCTGGCAGAGGCATACTTGTAC                 CAGTATGTGATGTTATGATGGTCCC
            Note: GAPDH1 represents glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene of rat, and GAPDH2 represents glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
            gene of mouse.

            2.3.3. Histological evaluation                     uniform. EDS showed that the surface coating of Mg/Sc
            The femur specimens were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde   group was mainly composed of C, N, Si, and O elements,
            for 72 h and decalcified using ethylenediaminetetraacetic   which are ceramic material formed by polysilazane at high
            acid (EDTA). All decalcified femur specimens were   temperature. Further, N and P appeared in the coating
            embedded in paraffin for histological slicing after the   of the Mg/Sc/ZA group, indicating that the coating
            3D-printed Mg alloy implants were removed. The slices   contained ZA. The two groups of coating elements were
            were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), Masson’s   evenly distributed (Figure 1B).  Figure 1C shows the
            trichrome, and TRAP. In addition, OPN and RUNX2    general morphology of the 3D-printed Mg alloy scaffolds
            immunohistochemical staining were performed.       before and after coating; the length, width, and height of
                                                               the scaffolds were all 10 mm. The surface morphology
            2.3.4. Biocompatibility evaluation in vivo         of the scaffolds before and after coating was observed by
            Nine weeks after Mg alloy scaffold implantation, blood   SEM, as shown in Figure 1D. The pore size distribution
            samples from animals in each group were collected before   of the scaffolds before and after coating was uniform, and
            euthanasia, and the serum Mg concentration and liver and   the surface of the uncoated scaffolds was smooth after
            kidney function indices were tested. After euthanasia, the   polishing, while the surface of the coated scaffolds (Mg/
            liver, kidney, heart, spleen, and lung were taken out of each   Sc group and Mg/Sc/ZA group) was rough owing to the
            animal from every group immediately. The morphologies of   deposition of polysilazane. In addition, the measurement
            the visceral tissue were evaluated after paraffin embedding,   results showed no significant differences in the pore size of
            slicing, and HE staining.                          the Mg alloy scaffolds among the three groups, indicating
            2.4. Statistical analysis                          that the coating had little effect on the pore characteristics
            The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation   of the porous scaffolds. There was no significant difference
            (SD) of at least three independent experiments. The results   in coating thickness between the Mg/Sc and Mg/Sc/ZA
            were analyzed by the Student’s t test or one-way analysis of   groups (Figure 1E).
            variance (ANOVA) using SPSS29.0 software (IBM Corp.,   The effects of the coating on the hydrophobic and
            USA). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.  oleophobic properties of the Mg alloy samples are shown in
                                                               Figure 1F. The water contact angle (WCA) of the Mg alloy
            3. Results                                         sample increases significantly, and the water sliding angle
                                                               (WSA) decreases significantly after coating, proving that
            3.1. Coating samples characterization              the ceramic coating can weaken the surface hydrophilicity
            As shown in Figure 1A, thicknesses of the coatings on the   of the Mg alloy samples and enhance their hydrophobicity.
            bulk samples of the Mg/Sc and Mg/Sc/ZA groups were   The right side of  Figure 1F shows a similar trend. The


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        405                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.769
   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418