Page 499 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting CECM-GelMA bioinks of DLP 3D printing for corneal engineering

3. Ruiz-Alonso S, Villate-Beitia I, Gallego I, et al., 2021, Current 17. Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW, 2009, Extracellular
insights into 3D bioprinting: An advanced approach for eye matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and
tissue regeneration. Pharmaceutics, 13(3): 308. function. Acta Biomater, 5(1): 1–13.
4. Weng T, Zhang W, Xia Y, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting for skin 18. Lawrence BD, Marchant JK, Pindrus MA, et al., 2009, Silk
tissue engineering: Current status and perspectives. J Tissue film biomaterials for cornea tissue engineering. Biomaterials,
Eng, 12: 20417314211028574. 30(7): 1299–1308.
5. Zhang X, Liu Y, Luo C, et al., 2021, Crosslinker-free silk/ 19. Kilic Bektas C, Hasirci V, 2020, Cell loaded GelMA: HEMA
decellularized extracellular matrix porous bioink for 3D IPN hydrogels for corneal stroma engineering. J Mater Sc,
bioprinting-based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci 31(1): 1–15.
Eng C, 118: 111388.
20. He B, Wang J, Xie M, et al., 2022, 3D printed biomimetic
6. Auger FA, Gibot L, Lacroix D, 2013, The pivotal role of epithelium/stroma bilayer hydrogel implant for corneal
vascularization in tissue engineering. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, regeneration. Bioact Mater, 17: 234–247.
15(1): 177–200.
21. Badylak SF, 2007, The extracellular matrix as a biologic
7. Mao Q, Wang Y, Li Y, et al., 2020, Fabrication of liver scaffold material. Biomaterials, 28(25): 3587–3593.
microtissue with liver decellularized extracellular matrix
(dECM) bioink by digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting. 22. Uyanıklar M, Gunal G, Tevlek A, et al., 2019, Hybrid cornea:
Mater Sci Eng C, 109: 110625. Cell laden hydrogel incorporated decellularized matrix. ACS
Biomater Sci Eng, 6(1): 122–133.
8. Duarte Campos DF, Rohde M, Ross M, et al., 2019, Corneal 23. Kim H, Park M-N, Kim J, et al., 2019, Characterization of
bioprinting utilizing collagen-based bioinks and primary cornea-specific bioink: High transparency, improved in vivo
human keratocytes. J Biomed Mater Res A, 107(9): 1945–1953.
safety. J Tissue Eng, 10: 2041731418823382.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36702.
24. Yazdanpanah G, Shen X, Nguyen T, et al., 2022, A light‐
9. Zhang B, Xue Q, Hu HY, et al., 2019, Integrated 3D curable and tunable extracellular matrix hydrogel for in
bioprinting-based geometry-control strategy for fabricating situ suture‐free corneal repair. Adv Funct Mater, 32(24):
corneal substitutes. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 20(12): 945–959. 2113383.
https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1900190. 25. Kim H, Jang J-H, Han W, et al., 2023, Extracellular
matrix-based sticky sealants for scar-free corneal tissue
10. Li L, Lu C, Wang L, et al., 2018, Gelatin-based photocurable reconstruction. Biomaterials, 292: 121941.
hydrogels for corneal wound repair. ACS Appl Mater
Interfaces, 10(16): 13283–13292. 26. Shen X, Li S, Zhao X, et al., 2023, Dual-crosslinked
regenerative hydrogel for sutureless long-term repair of
11. Yu C, Ma X, Zhu W, et al., 2019, Scanningless and continuous
3D bioprinting of human tissues with decellularized corneal defect. Bioact Mater, 20(2023): 434–448.
extracellular matrix. Biomaterials, 194: 1–13. 27. Chen F, Le P, Lai K, et al., 2020, Simultaneous interpenetrating
polymer network of collagen and hyaluronic acid as an
12. Zhang AP, Qu X, Soman P, et al., 2012, Rapid fabrication
of complex 3D extracellular microenvironments by dynamic in situ-forming corneal defect filler. Chem Mater, 32(12):
optical projection stereolithography. Adv Mater, 24(31): 5208–5216.
4266–4270. 28. Rafat M, Jabbarvand M, Sharma N, et al., 2023,
Bioengineered corneal tissue for minimally invasive vision
13. Miotto M, Gouveia RM, Ionescu AM, et al., 2019, 4D
Corneal tissue engineering: achieving time-dependent tissue restoration in advanced keratoconus in two clinical cohorts.
self-curvature through localized control of cell actuators. Nat Biotechnol, 41(1): 70–81.
Adv Funct Mater, 29(8).10.1002/adfm.201807334. 29. Mao Q, Wang Y, Li Y, et al., 2020, Fabrication of liver
microtissue with liver decellularized extracellular matrix
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201807334.
(dECM) bioink by digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting.
14. Das S, Jang J, 2018, 3D bioprinting and decellularized ECM- Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 109: 110625.
based biomaterials for in vitro CV tissue engineering. J 3D https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110625
Print Med, 2(2): 69–87.
30. Basara G, Ozcebe SG, Ellis BW, et al., 2021, Tunable human
15. Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF, 2011, An overview
of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. myocardium derived decellularized extracellular matrix
Biomaterials, 32(12): 3233–3243. for 3D bioprinting and cardiac tissue engineering. Gels,
7(2): 70.
16. Nakayama KH, Batchelder CA, Lee CI, et al., 2010,
Decellularized rhesus monkey kidney as a three-dimensional 31. Petroll WM, Miron-Mendoza M, 2015, Mechanical
scaffold for renal tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, interactions and crosstalk between corneal keratocytes and
16(7): 2207–2216. the extracellular matrix. Exp Eye Res, 133: 49–57.

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 491 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.774