Page 544 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting GelMA/PEG-TA IPN networks for 3D bioprinting

24. Decante G, Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, et al., 2021, Engineering https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.039
bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 13: 032001.
34. Xiao W, He J, Nichol JW, et al., 2011, Synthesis and
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abec2c characterization of photocrosslinkable gelatin and silk
25. Gao G, Yonezawa T, Hubbell K, et al., 2015, Inkjet- fibroin interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Acta
bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with human Biomater, 7: 2384–2393.
mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.016
formation with minimal printhead clogging. Biotechnol J,
10: 1568–1577. 35. Shin H, Olsen BD, Khademhosseini A, 2012, The mechanical
properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network
https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400635 hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan
26. Daniele MA, Adams AA, Naciri J, et al., 2014, Interpenetrating gum biomacromolecules. Biomaterials, 33: 3143–3152.
networks based on gelatin methacrylamide and PEG formed https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.050
using concurrent thiol click chemistries for hydrogel tissue
engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 35: 1845–1856. 36. Serban MA, Kaplan DL, 2010, pH-sensitive ionomeric
particles obtained via chemical conjugation of silk with
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.009 poly(amino acid)s. Biomacromolecules, 11: 3406–3412.

27. Pacelli S, Rampetsreiter K, Modaresi S, et al., 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100925s
Fabrication of a double-cross-linked interpenetrating
polymeric network (IPN) hydrogel surface modified with 37. Park KM, Ko KS, Joung YK, et al., 2011, In situ cross-linkable
polydopamine to modulate the osteogenic differentiation gelatin-poly(ethylene glycol)-tyramine hydrogel viaenzyme-
of adipose-derived stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, mediated reaction for tissue regenerative medicine. J Mater
10: 24955–24962. Chem, 21: 13180–13187.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b05200 https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM12527C
28. Schipani R, Scheurer S, Florentin R, et al., 2020, Reinforcing 38. Jin R, Teixeira LS, Dijkstra PJ, et al., 2010, Enzymatically-
interpenetrating network hydrogels with 3D printed crosslinked injectable hydrogels based on biomimetic
polymer networks to engineer cartilage mimetic composites. dextran-hyaluronic acid conjugates for cartilage tissue
Biofabrication, 12: 035011. engineering. Biomaterials, 31: 3103–3113.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8708 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.013
29. Zhang X, Kim GJ, Kang MG, et al., 2018, Marine biomaterial- 39. Wang R, Leber N, Buhl C, et al., 2014, Cartilage adhesive
based bioinks for generating 3D printed tissue constructs. and mechanical properties of enzymatically crosslinked
Mar Drugs, 16: 484. polysaccharide tyramine conjugate hydrogels. Polym Advan
Technol, 25: 568–574.
https://doi.org/10.3390/md16120484
https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.3286
30. Jeon O, Shin JY, Marks R, et al., 2017, Highly elastic and
tough interpenetrating polymer network-structured hybrid 40. Wei Q, Xu M, Liao C, et al., 2016, Printable hybrid hydrogel
hydrogels for cyclic mechanical loading-enhanced tissue by dual enzymatic polymerization with superactivity. Chem
engineering. Chem Mater, 29: 8425–8432. Sci, 7: 2748–2752.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02995 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SC02234G
31. Seyedmahmoud R, Çelebi-Saltik B, Barros N, et al., 2019, 41. Wang R, Both SK, Geven M, et al., 2015, Kinetically stable
Three-dimensional bioprinting of functional skeletal metal ligand charge transfer complexes as crosslinks in
muscle tissue using gelatin methacryloyl-alginate bioinks. nanogels/hydrogels: Physical properties and cytotoxicity.
Micromachines (Basel), 10: 679. Acta Biomater, 26: 136–144.
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10100679 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.019
32. Fares MM, Sani ES, Lara RP, et al., 2018, Interpenetrating 42. Fantini V, Bordoni M, Scocozza F, et al., 2019, Bioink
network gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and pectin-g-PCL composition and printing parameters for 3D modeling
hydrogels with tunable properties for tissue engineering. neural tissue. Cells, 8:830.
Biomater Sci, 6: 2938–2950.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8080830
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8bm00474a
43. Wang R, Huang X, Zoetebier B, et al., 2023, Enzymatic
33. Berger AJ, Linsmeier KM, Kreeger PK, et al., 2017, co-crosslinking of star-shaped poly(ethylene glycol)
Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on tyramine and hyaluronic acid tyramine conjugates provides
cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin- elastic biocompatible and biodegradable hydrogels. Bioact
methacrylate and collagen. Biomaterials, 141: 125–135. Mater, 20: 53–63.

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 536 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.750