Page 150 - v11i4
P. 150

International Journal of Bioprinting                                         AI for sustainable bioprinting






































































            Figure 5. Machine learning in optimizing processing parameters for bioprinting. (A) A hierarchical machine learning model used for optimizing three-
            dimensional printing parameters. (i) The schematics of the model integrating laboratory-controlled system variables, middle-layer physical relationships,
            and statistical inference to predict and enhance print fidelity based on dimensional error metrics. (ii) Visualization of trade-offs in optimizing printing
            parameters for high-fidelity features.  Reprinted with permission from Bone et al.  Copyright © 2020, American Chemical Society. (B) Artificial
                                                                   85
                                    85
            intelligence (AI)-assisted high-throughput printing-condition-screening system. Real-time image recognition analyzes printed patterns, classifying them
            into droplets, droplet lines, or continuous lines. AI-generated phase diagrams guide parameter selection for achieving optimal print fidelity and uniformity,
            reducing material waste and improving sustainable bioprinting efficiency.  Reprinted with permission from Xu et al.  Copyright © 2020, Springer Nature.
                                                          88
                                                                                     88
            (C) Machine learning-guided parameter optimization in bioprinting. (i) Low-printability validation: Parameters resulted in (A-1) irregular filaments, (A-2)
            deformed cube, and (A-3) non-uniform grid. (ii) High-printability validation: Optimized parameters produced (B-1) uniform filaments, (B-2) well-formed
            cube, and  (B-3) geometrically accurate pyramid.  Scale bar: 1.87 mm for (A-1) and (B-1); 2 mm for (A-3), (B-2), and (B-3). Reprinted from Fu et al. 87
                                           87
            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       142                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025170164
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155