Page 282 - v11i4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D cell culture model for neural cell analysis

administering them in a 3D-bioprinted GelMA hydrogel, review of outcomes with a minimum of 5 years follow-up.
we enabled precise and reproducible evaluation of particle– Global Spine J. 2024;14(6):1827-1837.
cell interactions. Short-term exposure did not significantly doi: 10.1177/21925682241228756
impact cell viability or ROS production across the tested 3. Zeegers W, Bohnen L, Laaper M, Verhaegen M. Artificial
conditions. However, our results revealed significant disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III:
variations in cell viability and ROS production, which 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine
were influenced by culture time, biomaterial type, and J. 1999;8:210-217.
the interactions between particles and cells. In particular, doi: 10.1007/s005860050160
CoCrMo particles had a greater impact on cell viability 4. Vicars R, Hyde PJ, Brown TD, et al. The effect of anterior–
compared to the other biomaterials tested. These findings posterior shear load on the wear of ProDisc-L TDR. Eur
underscore the potential of this bioprinted platform as a Spine J. 2010;19(8):1356-1362.
powerful tool for future long-term mechanistic studies and doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1396-8
preclinical assessments of spinal implant biocompatibility. 5. Vicars R, Prokopovich P, Brown TD, et al. The effect of
anterior-posterior shear on the wear of CHARITÉ total disc
Acknowledgments replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(9):E528-E534.
None. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823cbd6e
6. Hallab NJ. A review of the biologic effects of spine implant
Funding debris: fact from fiction. SAS J. 2009;3(4):143-160.
doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2009.11.005
None.
7. Chang B-S, Brown PR, Sieber A, Valdevit A, Tateno K,
Conflict of interest Kostuik JP. Evaluation of the biological response of wear
debris. Spine J. 2004;4(6):S239-S244.
The authors declare they have no competing interests doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.014

Author contributions 8. Ganko R, Madhavan A, Hamouda W, et al. Spinal
implant wear particles: generation, characterization,
Conceptualization: Joanne L. Tipper biological impacts, and future considerations. iScience.
Formal analysis: Joanne L. Tipper, David J. Wen, 2025;28(4):112193.
Javad Tavakoli doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112193
Investigation: David J. Wen 9. Punt IM, Austen S, Cleutjens JP, et al. Are periprosthetic
Methodology: Joanne L. Tipper, David J. Wen, Javad Tavakoli tissue reactions observed after revision of total disc
Writing–original draft: Javad Tavakoli, David J. Wen replacement comparable to the reactions observed after
Writing–review & editing: Joanne L. Tipper, Javad Tavakoli total hip or knee revision surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976).
2012;37(2):150-159.
Ethics approval and consent to participate doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182154c22
Not applicable. 10. San-Juan R, Paredes I, Ramírez-Nava E, et al. Reduction
of instrumentation-related spine surgical site infections
Consent for publication after optimization of surgical techniques. a single center
retrospective analysis. Global Spine J. 2024;14(2):438-446.
Not applicable. doi: 10.1177/21925682221109557
11. Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Nadaud MC, Phillips ER. Local tissue
Availability of data of the lumbar spine response to titanium plate-screw system.
Data is available from the corresponding author upon Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(7):871-873.
reasonable request. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00020
12. Lin T-h, Tamaki Y, Pajarinen J, et al. Chronic inflammation
References in biomaterial-induced periprosthetic osteolysis: NF-κB as a
therapeutic target. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(1):1-10.
1. Tavakoli J, Diwan AD, Tipper JL. Advanced strategies for the doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.034
regeneration of lumbar disc annulus fibrosus. Int J Mol Sci. 13. Zairi F, Remacle JM, Allaoui M, Assaker R. Delayed
2020;21(14):4889. hypersensitivity reaction caused by metal-on-metal
doi: 10.3390/ijms21144889
total disc replacement: case report. J Neurosurg Spine.
2. Wen DJ, Tavakoli J, Tipper JL. Lumbar total disc 2013;19(3):389-391.
replacements for degenerative disc disease: a systematic doi: 10.3171/2013.6.spine121010

Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025) 274 doi: 10.36922/IJB025180174