Page 96 - v11i4
P. 96

International Journal of Bioprinting                                        Printed organoids for medicine




            Innovations in culture optimization and the discovery   Supervision: Zhigang Cai, Shang Xie, Xiaofeng Shan
            of novel ECM-mimetic scaffold materials have partially   Validation: Zhigang Cai, Shang Xie, Xiaofeng Shan
            mitigated  longstanding  challenges  related  to  poor   Writing–original draft: Lingzi Liao
            standardization and suboptimal cell yield.  However,   Writing–review & editing: Shang Xie, Zhigang Cai,
                                                226
            persistent technical barriers impede progress, particularly   Qiushi Feng
            in  balancing  geometric precision with the  preservation
            of cellular  viability  and functional integrity.  Current   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            systems often struggle to achieve high-fidelity without   Not applicable.
            compromising the metabolic and physiological activity of
            encapsulated cells.                                Consent for publication
               To unlock the full potential of 3D bioprinted
            organoids, future research must prioritize three   Not applicable.
            interrelated  avenues: (i)  the  engineering  of advanced   Availability of data
            bioinks with tunable mechanical, biochemical, and
            degradation properties to better emulate native tissues,   Not applicable.
            (ii) the refinement of printing methodologies to enhance
            spatial resolution while minimizing mechanical stress   References
            on delicate cellular components, and (iii) the synergistic
            integration of organoid systems with complementary   1.   Zhao Z, Chen X, Dowbaj AM, et al. Organoids.  Nat Rev
            biofabrication technologies (e.g., microfluidics, organ-     Methods Primers. 2022;2(1):94.
                                                                  doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00174-y
            on-a-chip  platforms) to construct physiologically
            relevant,  multi-tissue  models.  Such  advancements  will   2.   Geng Y, Chen Z, Luo T, et al. Innovative construction and
            not only address existing technical limitations but also    application of bile duct organoids: unraveling the complexity
            expand the scope of organoid applications in precision   of bile duct diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
            medicine, disease modeling, and high-throughput       Cancer Lett. 2025;618:217619.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217619
            drug screening.
                                                               3.   Hermans F, Hasevoets S, Vankelecom H, Bronckaers A,
            Acknowledgment                                        Lambrichts I. From pluripotent stem cells to organoids
                                                                  and bioprinting: recent advances in dental epithelium and
            The author team would like to extend their sincere gratitude   ameloblast models to study tooth biology and regeneration.
            to the research teams whose works have been cited in this   Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2024;20(5):1184-1199.
            review. Special thanks are given to those who generously      doi: 10.1007/s12015-024-10702-w
            granted permission for the reuse of their data. Their   4.   Mallya  D,  Gadre  MA,  Varadharajan S,  Vasanthan  KS.  3D
            valuable contributions have laid a solid foundation for the   bioprinting for the construction of drug testing models-
            advancement of 3D-printed organoid research and have   development strategies and regulatory concerns.  Front
            provided important insights that shaped the perspectives   Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1457872.
            discussed in this manuscript.                         doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1457872
                                                               5.   Nejati B, Shahhosseini R, Hajiabbasi M, et al. Cancer-on-
            Funding                                               chip: a breakthrough organ-on-a-chip technology in cancer
            This work was supported by the National Key Research   cell modeling. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025;63(2):321-337.
            and Development Program of China (Grant No.           doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03199-5
            2022YFC2504200)  and  the  National  Natural  Science   6.   Hu Y, Zhu T, Cui H, Cui H. Integrating 3D bioprinting and
            Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82373434 and 82002878).  organoids to better recapitulate the complexity of cellular
                                                                  microenvironments for tissue engineering.  Adv  Healthc
            Conflict of interest                                  Mater. 2025;14(3):e2403762.
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/adhm.202403762
            The authors declare no conflict of interest.
                                                               7.   Huang MS, Christakopoulos F, Roth JG, Heilshorn SC.
                                                                  Organoid bioprinting: from cells to functional tissues.
            Author contributions                                  Review. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2025;3(2):126-142.

            Conceptualization: All authors                        doi: 10.1038/s44222-024-00268-0
            Funding acquisition: Zhigang Cai, Shang Xie        8.   Ju M, Jin Z, Yu X, et al. Gastric cancer models developed via
            Resources: Zhigang Cai, Shang Xie, Xiaofeng Shan      GelMA 3D bioprinting accurately mimic cancer hallmarks,



            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                        88                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025190184
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101