Page 35 - IJOCTA-15-1
P. 35

Global convergence property with inexact line search for a new conjugate gradient method
                                            hyb     HZ
            equation (8). If θ k ≥ 1, set β     = β    . If   According to Lemma 2, Assumptions 1 and 2, the
                                            k       k
            θ k ≤ 0, set β hyb  = β BA .                      strong Wolfe conditions, and (15), it follows that
                        k      k                               T
                                               hyb            g d k ̸= 0 for all k ≥ 0. Therefore, α k = 0 does
            Step 6. Compute d = −g k+1 + β       d k . If the  k
                                              k               not satisfy (4). This implies that α k = 0 in the
            restart criterion of Powell’s condition
                                                              new hybrid conjugate gradient algorithm is not
                         |g T  g             2                valid, and there exists a constant λ > 0 such that
                           k+1 k | ≥ 0.2∥g k+1 ∥ ,
            is satisfied, then set d k+1 = −g k+1 . Otherwise,             α k ≥ λ, for all k ≥ 0.       (22)
            define d k+1 = d.
            Step 7. Set k = k + 1 and continue with Step 1.
                                                              Now, we will give the following Theorem, which
            3. Global convergence                             shows the global convergence of our new method.
            In this section, we study the global convergence  Theorem 3. Let Assumptions 1 and 2 hold.
            properties of the proposed conjugate gradient     Consider the iterative method of the form (2),(8)
            method. To proceed, we make the following As-     and (9). Then either g k = 0, for some k, or
            sumptions and present several lemmas.
                                                        n                     lim inf ∥g k ∥ = 0.        (23)
            Assumption 1. The level set S = {x ∈ R         :                 k→∞
            f(x) ≤ f(x 0 )} is bounded, i.e., there exists a con-
            stant B > 0 such that
                                                              Proof. Suppose that g k ̸= 0, for all k. We will
                        ∥x∥ ≤ B,   for all x ∈ S.      (16)   prove (23) by contradiction.Assume that (23)

            Assumption 2. In a neighborhood N of S, the       does not hold.   Then, there exists a constant
            function f is continuously differentiable, and its  c > 0 such that
            gradient ∇f(x) is Lipschitz continuous. That is,
            there exists a constant 0 < L < ∞ such that                     ∥g k ∥ ≥ c, for all k ,      (24)

                                                              according to the relations (4) and (15), we obtain:
            ∥∇f(x) − ∇f(y)∥ ≤ L∥x − y∥,     for all x, y ∈ N.
                                                                                                      2
                                                                                        2
                                                                     T
            Under Assumptions 1 and 2 on f, there exists a          d y k ≥ K(1 − σ)∥g k ∥ ≥ K(1 − σ)c .
                                                                     k
            constant Γ ≥ 0, such that
                                                              By using the Lipschitz condition, we get:
                             ∥∇f(x)∥ ≤ Γ,              (17)              ∥y k ∥ = ∥g k+1 − g k ∥ ≤ LD,
                                                              where D = max{∥x − y∥, x, y ∈ N} is the diam-
            for all x ∈ S.                                    eter of N.
                                                              We have
            Lemma 1. Let Assumptions 1 and 2 hold. Con-
            sider the method (2) and (3), where d k is a de-     d hyb  = −g k+1 + (1 − θ k )β BA d k + θ k β HZ d k ,
            scent direction and α k is obtained from the strong   k+1                    k          k
            Wolfe line search. If
                                                              since, 0 < θ k < 1, we obtain:
                            X     1
                                      = ∞,             (18)
                                ∥d k ∥ 2                          hyb                BA      HZ
                            k≥0                                 ∥d k+1 ∥ ≤ ∥g k+1 ∥ + (|β k  | + |β k  |)∥d k ∥.  (25)
            then
                            lim inf ∥g k ∥ = 0.        (19)   They proved in 20  and 31  that:
                           k→∞
                                                                                        2
                                                                                       L D 2
                                                                             BA
            Lemma 2.    1  Suppose that Assumptions 1 and 2                |β k  | ≤  K(1 − σ)c 2  ,
            hold. If d k is a descent direction and α k satisfies
                        g T  d     T      σ < 1,       (20)   and
                         k+1 k ≥ σg d k ,
                                   k
            then
                                         T
                               (1 − σ) |d g k |
                         α k ≥        ·  k    .        (21)   |β HZ | ≤     1       LDΓ + 2    σ    (LD) 2  .
                                 L      ∥d k ∥ 2                k      (1 − σ)Kc 2           (1 − σ)
            Proof. The proof of Lemma 2 can be found          Using the above relations and (22), the equation
            in. 1                                        □    (25) becomes:
                                                            29
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40