Page 32 - IJPS-1-1
P. 32

Diagnosis and control of hypertension in the elderly populations of Japan and the United States

                                      antihypertensives. The improvement of blood pressure control in the U.S. in recent years
                                      (Crimmins, Garcia, and Kim, 2010; Cutler, Sorlie, Wolz et al., 2008; Hajjar and Kotchen,

                                      2003) is generally credited to the increasing use of polytherapy (concomitant prescription
                                      of multiple classes of antihypertensive medications). In 2004, approximately 60% of anti-
                                      hypertension drug treatment regimens involved  multiple drugs (Ma, Lee, and Stafford,
                                      2006) . In 2002 a large study of Japanese treatment of hypertensives found that combina-
                                      tion therapy  occurred in only 35.3% of  patients (Mori, Ukai, Yamamoto  et al., 2006).
                                      Another possible explanation for the observed differences could be goal-oriented man-
                                      agement of hypertension which is more common in the U.S. while a fixed drug treatment
                                      algorithm is more common in Japan (Cushman and Basile, 2006) .
                                        All of these factors  point to  interventions in  clinical practice to reach  optimal blood
                                      pressure control. Regular monitoring, providing diagnoses, prescribing medications so that
                                      they can be  easily obtained, and titration of drug regimens are all crucial to control of
                                      hypertension. However, underlying differences in the level of blood pressure between so-
                                      cieties may still have an effect on outcomes.
                                        The results of our study reveal the complexities of looking at international differences
                                      in  health. Given  their increased  life expectancy  and  universal health  care  access, one
                                      would have expected the Japanese diagnosis and control of hypertension to be superior to
                                      that in  the U.S.  We  find  that the U.S. is relatively  effective  in  diagnosing  and  treating
                                      hypertension. However, hypertensive treatment may not reflect other medical treatments.
                                      Lastly, hypertensive related mortality is primarily linked to stroke, which is not the leading
                                      or even second leading cause of death in both countries and may therefore not contribute
                                      as much as cancer or cardiovascular mortality to overall life expectancy (Glei, Mesle, and
                                      Vallin, 2010). Mortality from stroke has dropped markedly in Japan in recent years; al-
                                      though it remains somewhat higher in Japanese men and women than in Americans.
                                        We should note some limitations of our study. We were only able to compare national
                                      samples for 2006 and hypertensive state and the use of medications are changing rapidly in
                                      both countries so that future research should examine changes after 2006. In addition we
                                      do not consider all the determinants of hypertensive state in this analysis. For instance,
                                      there are life style factors that may be related to hypertension such as obesity and smoking
                                      (Davarian, Crimmins, Takahashi et al., 2013). Further investigation of these in compara-
                                      tive analyses may provide greater insights into the root of these differences.

                                      Conflict of Interest and Funding

                                      There are no potential conflicts of interest. The data collection in Japan was partially sup-
                                      ported by the Academic Frontier Project for Private Universities: matching fund subsidy
                                      from MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), 2006–2010.
                                      Acknowledgements and Author Contributions

                                      Support for the HRS data collection was primarily provided by the National Institute on
                                      Aging (U01 AG009740). Analysis was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the
                                      United States (P30AG017265). Authors are responsible for the content of the article.
                                        The author contributions are as follows:
                                        •  Yasuhiko Saito: Collected data, performed data analysis, drafted and revised article
                                        •  Shieva Davarian: Performed initial data analysis and contributed to drafting and re-
                                            vising
                                        •  Atsuhiko Takahashi: Collected data, contributed to revising article
                                        •  Edward Schneider: Drafted and revised article
                                        •  Eileen  M. Crimmins: Conceptualized  article, performed  analysis, drafted  and  re-
                                            vised article

       International Journal of Population Studies | 2015, Volume 1, Issue 1                                    26
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37