Page 29 - IJPS-11-2
P. 29

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                  Living alone and loneliness in older adults




            Table 3. Multinomial logistic regression analysis of the correlates of the typology based on living alone and loneliness for urban
            older adults in China
                                                 Living alone and lonely  Living alone but not lonely  Not living alone but lonely
            Age (80 – 89) (vs. 65 – 79)                0.038                0.040                 0.029
                                                      (0.137)              (0.125)                (0.092)
            Age (90 – 99) (vs. 65 – 79)              −0.737***            −0.541***              −0.300**
                                                      (0.163)              (0.151)                (0.110)
            Age (100+) (vs. 65 – 79)                 −1.516***            −1.303***              −0.446***
                                                      (0.200)              (0.188)                (0.124)
            Men (vs. women)                           0.307**               0.134                 0.035
                                                      (0.108)              (0.100)                (0.069)
            Currently married (vs. no)               −4.063***            −2.939***              −0.773***
                                                      (0.224)              (0.166)                (0.092)
            1 – 6 years of education (vs. 0)          −0.099               −0.114                −0.162*
                                                      (0.121)              (0.112)                (0.079)
            7+ years of education (vs. 0)             −0.116               −0.049                 −0.025
                                                      (0.177)              (0.156)                (0.107)
            White-collar occupation before retirement (vs. no)  0.032      −0.022                −0.324**
                                                      (0.180)              (0.154)                (0.107)
            Financially independent (vs. no)          −0.003                0.117                 −0.013
                                                      (0.115)              (0.104)                (0.072)
            Rich family economic status (vs. no)     −0.718***             −0.384**              −0.363***
                                                      (0.142)              (0.112)                (0.082)
            Family emotional support (vs. no)         −0.406*              −0.143                 −0.011
                                                      (0.170)              (0.158)                (0.088)
            Individual activity participation (vs. no)  −0.453***          −0.225                 −0.049
                                                      (0.123)              (0.122)                (0.080)
            Group activity participation (vs. no)      0.112                0.089                 −0.037
                                                      (0.118)              (0.105)                (0.078)
            Community service (vs. no)                 0.148                0.091                 −0.015
                                                      (0.100)              (0.092)                (0.062)
            ADL disabled (vs. no)                    −0.975***            −1.106***               0.101
                                                      (0.136)              (0.137)                (0.078)
            IADL disabled (vs. no)                    −0.006               −0.101                0.352***
                                                      (0.127)              (0.113)                (0.086)
            Cognitively impaired (vs. no)              0.000               −0.059                0.220**
                                                      (0.124)              (0.119)                (0.079)
            Self-rated good health (vs. no)          −0.966***              0.154                −0.936***
                                                      (0.103)              (0.091)                (0.065)
            Chronic disease (vs. no)                  −0.153               −0.030                 −0.030
                                                      (0.120)              (0.109)                (0.077)
            intercept                                 0.590*               −0.331                −0.405*
                                                      (0.255)              (0.244)                (0.164)
            Log-likelihood                                                 −7,008.503
            N                                                                8,064
            Pseudo R 2                                                       0.135
            Notes: +p<0.1, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Standard error in brackets.
            Abbreviations: ADL: Activities of daily living; IADL: Instrumental activities of daily living.

            4. Discussion                                      using a nationally representative sample in China and
            To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to   examine  the  correlates  of  the  typology  according  to
            examine the typology of living alone and loneliness   Andersen’s behavioral model, which facilitates the


            Volume 11 Issue 2 (2025)                        23                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.4184
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34