Page 139 - IJPS-11-3
P. 139

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Drivers of reproductive delay in the UK



            that their window of reproductive opportunity is already   mothers, suggesting perhaps that having experienced the
            quite limited. After age 25, fecundity starts to deteriorate   demands of motherhood emphasizes the importance of not
            and although  many women  have  successful  pregnancies   doing it alone.
            in  their  late  thirties  and  early  forties,  the  risks  are  still   Research on reproductive decision-making is made
            substantially higher than in their 20s (Hadley, 2021). This   more difficult by the fact that there is almost always at
            finding might also shed light on the reasons for unwanted   least one other person, usually a partner, involved in the
            childlessness, which is around 20% for women in the UK   decision-making process. It is difficult to incorporate this
            (Berrington,  2004);  if  the  reproductive  window  is  only   negotiating process in typical survey methods that aim to
            around 10 years and the persistent need for a supportive   identify causes of delayed fertility and have been so far, best
            hands-on partner is not met soon after age 33, then it may   understood from qualitative work (Bernardi et al., 2015).
            simply be too late to conceive. This was the only group   Although the DCE methodology presented here cannot
            for which baby timing became salient later in adulthood;   fully encapsulate the negotiating process between couples,
            it is possible; however, that there are different priorities at   we can get a sense of how important partner needs are.
            earlier ages that are not covered in this study. Scaling up   For university men, this was particularly important and it
            this research can explore the differences within age groups   was clear that they value highly their partner’s readiness
            as well as across educational strata.
                                                               for children. University women, likely the partners in
              All three other demographics showed significant baby-  question, are prioritizing most highly for hands-on dads.
            timing estimates from the youngest ages modelled (18 years   Non-university women were less concerned about their
            for non-university and age 21 for university-educated). This   partner’s readiness or support but were very concerned
            finding questions the broad observation that education   about their commitment to the relationship. These findings
            delays fertility for educated men; baby timing is important   are in line with other work documenting that a primary
            from any age (below 38 years) although they do rate their   reason for remaining childless is “never having met the
            partner’s readiness very highly. Given that it is likely that   right person” and this is a common reason given by both
            educated men are partnering with educated women (Erát,   men and women (Berrington, 2017).
            2021), the combination of these two findings suggests   The main limitation of this work is the relatively small
            that women are driving fertility delay in educated men.   sample size. It was designed as a test case to examine how
            Although implicit in much fertility research, as far as I am   effective applying this methodology to a novel question
            aware, this study provides the first empirical evidence of this   would be. As such, it was conducted as a pilot study which
            phenomenon. This also draws some parallels with partial   could be expanded in future work, in particular, to be able
            explanations for the SDT being attributed to ideational   to ask more demographic background questions, such as
            change since the 1960s (Lesthaeghe, 2014; Mills et al., 2011).   about respondents’ religiosity, and their gender and ethnic
            Having smaller families, and making individual choices,   identities to test if the barriers people face are mediated
            was seen by some as a feminist response to patriarchal   by these things. Similarly, a scaled-up study could examine
            control over female fertility. In line with this, we observe   regional or country variation so as to explore how different
            other changes too. These results show that educated women   local policies influence people’s needs.
            prioritize a hands-on partner very highly, suggesting a move
            away  from  the  traditional  male-breadwinner  narrative   5. Conclusion
            which is still pervasive in the literature (Bernardi & Keim,
            2017) lending full support to the gender revolution notion   Altogether, this study has revealed some of the primary
            that fertility will increase as men bear more of the weight   drivers of delayed fertility in the UK. It has also scrutinized
            of domestic labor (Goldscheider et al., 2015). This is not to   the differences between gender and educational groups,
            say finances and material needs are not important; women   which has not been done before. Although finances and
            in both groups rated this priority highly, but not as highly   housing conditions are important across the board, the most
            as partner characteristics. For non-university women, the   compelling finding is that partner support is highly valued
            evidence also suggests that partners are more important in   for all demographic groups, although in different ways, and
            terms of availability rather than as providers, although they   that not having this support is a significant contributor to the
            framed it in terms of commitment rather than hands-on   observed lengthy postponement of parenthood in the UK.
            fathering (Brough & Sheppard, 2022). This notion of
            changing gender norms in family roles is also indirectly   Acknowledgments
            supported from the analysis of differences between parents   The author thanks Mikaela Brough who collected the
            and non-parents. The need for partners, for both groups of   qualitative data that were used for the DCE design and is
            women, was more pronounced for those who were already   ever grateful to all the study participants.


            Volume 11 Issue 3 (2025)                       133                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3600
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144