Page 141 - IJPS-11-3
P. 141

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Drivers of reproductive delay in the UK



               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2017.03.001         Guenter, D. (2019). Patient trade-offs between continuity
                                                                  and access in primary care interprofessional teaching clinics
            Igarashi, H., Takahashi, T., & Nagase, S. (2015). Oocyte aging
               underlies female reproductive aging: Biological mechanisms   in Canada: A cross-sectional survey using discrete choice
               and therapeutic strategies.  Reproductive Medicine and   experiment. BMJ Open, 9(3):e023578.
               Biology, 14(4):159-169.                            https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023578
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-015-0209-5       Perez Troncoso, D. (2022). Efficient and Accessible Discrete
                                                                  Choice Experiments: Dcetool. Available from: https://www.
            Kjaer, T., Bech, M., Gyrd-Hansen, D., & Hart-Hansen, K.   SSRN 4016305.
               (2006). Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete
               choice experiments: Need we worry?  Health Economics,   Raybould, A., & Sear, R. (2020). Children of the (gender)
               15(11):1217-1228.                                  revolution:  A  theoretical  and  empirical  synthesis  of  how
                                                                  gendered division of labour influences fertility. Population
               https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1117
                                                                  Studies, 75(2), 1-22.
            Klesment, M., & Van Bavel, J. (2015). The Reversal of the Gender      https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2020.1851748
               Gap in Education and Female Breadwinners in Europe.
               Families and Societies Working Paper Series. Vol. 26, p.37.  Rose, J.M., & Bliemer, M.C.J. (2009). Constructing efficient
                                                                  stated choice experimental designs.  Transport Reviews,
            Kneale, D., & Joshi, H. (2008). Postponement and childlessness-  29(5):587-617.
               evidence from two British cohorts. Demographic Research,
               19(58):1935-1968.                                  https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640902827623
               https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.58       Smallwood, S., & Jeffries, J. (2003). Family Building Intentions in
                                                                  England and Wales: Trends, Outcomes and Interpretations.
            Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition:   Population Trends. Available from: https://www.academia.
               A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the   edu/49439350/family_building_intentions_in_england_
               National Academy of Sciences, 111(51):18112-18115.
                                                                  and_wales_trends_outcomes_and_interpretations
               https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111
                                                               StataCorp. (2021). Stata Statistical Software: Release 17
            Louviere, J., Flynn, T., & Carson, R. (2010). Discrete choice   (Version 17) [Computer Software]. Texas: StataCorp LLC.
               experiments are not conjoint analysis.  Journal of Choice   Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the
               Modelling, 3(3):57-72.
                                                                  second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western
               https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9      and Southern Europe: An update.  Demographic  Research,
                                                                  S3:45-86.
            McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition.
               Population and Development Review, 26(3):427-439.     https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3
               https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x   Testa, M.R., Bordone, V., Osiewalska, B., & Skirbekk, V. (2016).
                                                                  Are daughters’ childbearing intentions related to their
            Mills, M., Rindfuss, R.R., McDonald, P., Te Velde, E., & On   mothers’ socio-economic status?  Demographic Research,
               Behalf of the ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force.   35(21):581-616.
               (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons
               and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update,      https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.21
               17(6):848-860.                                  The World Bank. (2022). Fertility Rate, Total (Births per
               https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr026              Woman)-United  Kingdom.  Available  from:  https://
                                                                  data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.dyn.tfrt.in?name_
            Morgan, S.P., & Rackin, H. (2010).The correspondence between   desc=true&locations=GB [Last accessed on 2023 Oct 01].
               fertility intentions and behavior in the United States.
               Population and Development Review, 36(1):91-118.  Van Bavel, J. (2012). The  reversal  of  gender inequality  in
                                                                  education, union formation and fertility in Europe. Vienna
               https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00319.x
                                                                  Yearbook of Population Research, 10:127-154.
            Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2012). Fertility postponement   Van den Broek-Altenburg, E., & Atherly, A. (2020). Using discrete
               is largely due to rising educational enrolment.  Population   choice experiments to measure preferences for hard to
               Studies, 66(3):311-327.
                                                                  observe choice attributes to inform health policy decisions.
               https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2012.697569       Health Economics Review, 10(1):18.
            Oliver, D., Deal, K., Howard, M., Qian, H., Agarwal, G., &      https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00276-x








            Volume 11 Issue 3 (2025)                       135                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3600
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146