Page 23 - IJPS-11-3
P. 23

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                Nuptiality patterns among Ethiopian women



                                                               2.4. Ethical considerations

                                                               This study was based on secondary data from the EDHS.
                                                               The methodologies and questionnaires used in the EDHSs
                                                               were reviewed and approved by the ICF/ORC Institutional
                                                               Review Board. In addition, the study methodologies
                                                               received ethical approval (no.  3.10/114/2016) from the
                                                               Institutional Review Board offices of the Ethiopian Ministry
                                                               of Science and Technology and the Ethiopian Health and
                                                               Nutrition Research Institute. Verbal consent was obtained
                                                               from the respondents before conducting the interviews. To
                                                               ensure respondent anonymity, names, and other personal
                                                               identifiers were removed from the final dataset.
                                                               3. Results
            Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of first marriage for the two birth cohorts   Table  2 shows the distribution of women by selected
            by age
            Abbreviation: CIF: Cumulative incidence function.  socioeconomic variables of first marriage in Ethiopia.
                                                               The weighted sample comprises 3873 women, with 1804
                              k            k                   respondents from  the  first birth cohort (1965  –  1969)
                                   1
                                       2
                                      x
               Y   1 o    o     j  x     x   1 j    j   and 2069 respondents from the second birth cohort
                         2
                                1
                                                    2
                                             1
                                       j
                                   j
                                             j
                             j1          j1                  (1980 – 1984). Across all birth cohorts, a sizable portion
                                                               of the samples consisted of rural respondents. Between
              In the model specification shown above,  ∆=Y  Y 1  −Y  2    the two birth cohorts, the percentage of women living in
            refers to the magnitude of change in the cumulative   rural areas decreased from 85.12% in the earlier cohort to
            incidence of marriage at specific ages, namely, at 15, 20,   78.66% in the later one. A higher percentage of women in
            and 25. The first component on the right-hand side (RHS),   metropolitan areas  were  from  the  late  birth cohort.  The
              o
                  2
              1

                , represents the basic differences, which measure   more recent cohort of women also had higher levels of
                  o
                                                               education, greater media exposure, and lived in wealthier
            the effects of unobservable variables that are not included   households compared to the earlier cohort (Table 2).
                                                   2
                                            1
            or accounted for in the model. Here,  β  and  β  are the   In terms of education level, there was a slight increase
                                                   o
                                            o
            constant terms for  the models  of the  first and second   in literacy. The proportion of women with no education
            cohorts, respectively. The second component of the RHS,   decreased from 79.93% in the earlier cohort to 71.79% in
                  j
             k j 1  x   , captures the change in the average   the later cohort. The proportion of women with primary
                       x
                        2
                  1
                     1
                     j
                        j
                                                               education increased significantly from 13.68% to 19.57%,

            predicted cumulative incidence of marriage for the first   and the proportion of women with secondary and higher
            cohort when the covariates of the first cohort are set to   education  increased  slightly  from  6.39%  to  8.64%.  The
            match those of the second cohort. This represents the part   results also indicate that the proportion of women not
            of the overall difference that can be accounted for by group   working increased by 8.94%, from 34.67% to 43.61%.
            differences in the measured covariates, often referred to as   Similarly, the proportion of women employed in industry
            the endowment effect. In this case,  β  is the coefficient for   increased by 7.32%, from 25.17% to 32.49%. Amhara,
                                         1
                                         j
            the covariate  x  in the first cohort model, and for the   Oromiya, and the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and
                         j
            present analysis, the  overall effects were produced for   Peoples’ Region (SNNPR), accounted for more than four-
            categorical covariates. The final component of the RHS,, is   fifths  of the  samples  in  both cohorts.  Distribution  by
            referred to as the coefficient effect, which measures the   religion showed a similar pattern in both cohorts, with two-
            part of the difference in the outcome caused by the   thirds of the sample being affiliates of Christianity (Table 2).
            differential effects of observable variables on the outcome   In terms of community affluence, the percentage of
            across the two comparison groups. The  oaxaca_rif   women in the low and medium categories decreased
            command was used due to its flexibility in handling the   slightly, whereas the percentage in the highest category
            decomposition  of  various  distributional  statistics  (Rios-  increased significantly. Between the  two  birth cohorts,
            Avila, 2020).                                      community literacy increased in both the medium and high
            Volume 11 Issue 3 (2025)                        17                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3531
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28