Page 87 - IJPS-11-4
P. 87

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Droughts and intimate partner violence



            states affected by the NEM drought saw a 50% increase   complement a scientifically drawn sample. The lack of
            in the odds of PV, and this result is significant at the   longitudinal databases also severely limits causal inference
            5% significance level. The odds of EV increased by 46%   regarding the covariates of IPV.
            (p < 0.05). The urban sample showed no statistically
            significant increase in the odds of PV and EV post-  5. Conclusion
            exposure to the rainfall shock. The estimates for SV are   This study aimed to understand the impact of drought
            statistically insignificant for rural areas but show a 98%   on IPV in India, thereby improving previous studies by
            increase in the odds for the urban sample, which is   incorporating a more comprehensive set of covariates and
            significant  at  the  10%  level.  One  plausible  explanation   using data that effectively captures the effects of drought.
            for the difference in the change in odds of PV and SV   To maintain the integrity of the results, one major
            between rural and urban areas is that PV is more visible   drought-affected state was excluded from the analysis to
            than SV. It is easier for SV to go unnoticed by neighbors in   avoid contamination due to the onset of COVID-19. Our
            urban areas. Social tolerance toward wife-beating is more   findings revealed a strong association between exposure
            prevalent in rural areas; thus, PV may be the preferred   to NEM drought and an increased incidence of PV and
            method for expressing aggression. Furthermore,     EV. Although SV was also positively associated with
            respondents in rural areas might be more open to sharing   drought, the relationship was not statistically significant.
            incidences of SV than their urban counterparts.    In addition, our analysis highlights the heterogeneous
              The heterogeneous effect of drought on rural and   effects of drought across rural and urban areas. In rural
            urban samples also supports our suspicion that the   areas, we found a statistically significant relationship
            pathway between drought and IPV runs through low   between exposure to the NEM drought and both PV and
            income. Rural areas are predominantly responsible for   EV. In urban areas, although no significant relationship
            agricultural output; thus, a decline in this sector is likely to   emerged  between  PV  and  EV,  a  statistically  significant
            affect income more significantly. However, any conclusive   association for SV.
            comment can be made using a dataset that includes    We suspect that the link between drought and increased
            information about household income in addition to the   IPV may be mediated by a decline in agricultural incomes.
            domestic violence module of the NFHS. Our results also   However, since the NFHS does not collect income data,
            highlight the implications for policymakers. Providing   this hypothesis could not be directly tested. Although
            better government support during droughts could help   household assets are recorded, they tend to change slowly
            mitigate the incidence of IPV, especially in rural areas   and are not suitable proxies for income in causal analyses.
            directly affected by a reduction in agricultural income.   This study established a clear, strong, and positive
            Wage employment programs, properly targeted subsidies,   association between drought exposure and IPV. As
            and similar initiatives could relieve financial stress in rural   drought itself cannot be influenced by IPV, we contribute
            areas during periods of low rainfall, thereby keeping the   to the existing literature by presenting strong evidence of
            IPV under control.
                                                               drought’s effects on IPV in the Indian context.
              As mentioned earlier, exposure to stressors like drought
            intensifies controlling behavior in partners. Even if no   Acknowledgments
            visible incidence of PV, SV, or EV develops from such a   None.
            stressful situation, a considerable increase in controlling
            behavior alone can make life difficult for women. Further   Funding
            studies are needed to explore whether controlling behavior   None.
            and IPV are mediation. One possible policy intervention
            could focus on changing the mindsets of male partners   Conflict of interest
            since control issues are likely a manifestation of deeper
            societal or psychological factors.                 The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

            4.1. Limitations                                   Author contributions
            Our study faces the typical limitations of secondary data-  Conceptualization: Durgesh C. Pathak
            based research. The responses are self-reported by victims   Formal analysis: Durgesh C. Pathak
            of IPV and may suffer from recall bias and underreporting.   Methodology: Durgesh C. Pathak
            In addition, we recognize the potential of mixed-methods   Writing-original draft: All authors
            research in which qualitative interviews with women could   Writing-review & editing: Durgesh C. Pathak


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                        81                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.3065
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92