Page 97 - IJPS-11-4
P. 97

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                         Health disparities and older adults well-being in China



              For cognitive health, we used the MMSE score as the   Table 1. Summary statistics
            dependent variable in both models 5 and 6. Since model 5
            does not consider the impact of physical and mental health   Variables                  Mean  SD
            on cognitive health, we incorporated IADLs and CESD   ADLs≥1                             0.883 0.321
            scores as explanatory variables in model 6. The difference   IADLs≥1                     0.759 0.428
            between models 5 and 6 is the inclusion of these two   CESD≥10                           0.367 0.482
            variables to represent the physical and mental health of the   MMSE≤23                   0.411 0.492
            older ages in model 6. Finally, in model 7, we constructed   Age                        67.863 8.104
            a dummy variable for the older ages who are physically,   Male                           0.487 0.499
            mentally, and cognitively healthy. Using logit regression,   Education
            we verify if the socioeconomic variables have statistically
            significant positive effects on the older people’s physical,   Did not finish elementary school  0.216 0.412
            mental, and cognitive health.                       Elementary school graduates          0.204 0.403
                                                                Junior high school graduates         0.188 0.391
              In addition, Table 1 presents variables that serve as proxies
            for socioeconomic status among the older adults, including   Senior high school graduates  0.107 0.309
            education level, residential location, household registration   University graduates and above  0.015 0.123
            type, and Communist Party of China membership. We   Currently married                    0.816 0.388
            created five dummy variables to represent various education   One-person household       0.201 0.401
            levels. For residential location, we constructed an interaction   Household location
            of  two  dummy  variables:  one  indicating  urban  residence   Urban residence with rural household registration  0.099 0.299
            (assigned a value of 1) and the other representing a rural   Urban residence with urban household registration  0.172 0.378
            household registration (assigned a value of 1). This creation   Rural residence with rural household registration  0.676 0.468
            of dummies resulted in four combinations reflecting
            different household locations: urban residence with an urban   Communist Party of China member  0.108 0.310
            household registration (1,0), urban residence with a rural   Having savings              0.332 0.471
            household registration (1,1), rural residence with an urban   Living in the Yangtze River Delta/Pearl River Delta   0.095 0.293
            household registration (0,0), and rural residence with a   districts
            rural household registration (0,1). In addition, we employed   Abbreviations: ADLs: Activities of daily living; CESD: Center for
            Communist Party of China membership as a proxy for the   Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; IADLs: Instrumental
                                                               activities of daily living; MMSE: Mini-mental state examination;
            socioeconomic status of individuals who were employed in   SD: Standard deviation.
            government-related institutions before retirement.
              To  control  for  potential  confounding  variables,  we   In summary, our study employs a robust array of
            introduced control variables such as age, gender, marital   variables to comprehensively explore the multifaceted
            status, and household status into our models to mitigate   relationship between health and socioeconomic status
            estimation  bias.  Furthermore,  we  incorporated  two   among the older adults in China. This approach enables us
            dummy variables into our models to account for the   to gain valuable insights into the intricate dynamics at play
            impact of location on interviewed households (those   in this critical demographic segment.
            in well-developed eastern districts) and whether the
            households have savings. Both of these factors are known   3. Key findings
            to influence the health of the older adults. Given China’s   We employed the fourth wave of CHARLS data to conduct
            vast territory, uneven economic development, and diverse   a regression analysis of the health of the older adults from
            population structures, we introduced dummy variables for   three different perspectives: physical health (Models 1
            specific regions, including Shanghai City, Jiangsu Province,   and  2), mental health (models 3 and 4), and cognitive health
            Zhejiang Province, and Guangdong Province, primarily   (models 5 and 6). After analyzing these three different health
            concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl
            River Delta. These regions exhibit higher economic output   perspectives of the older-aged, we attempted to combine the
                                                               older people who are physically, mentally, and cognitively
            and greater demographic potential compared to others.
            Furthermore, in the context of China’s imperfect social   healthy into one index as an explanatory variable in model
            insurance system, we posit that the presence or absence   7. The main results are summarized as follows:
            of household savings can exert a positive influence on the   First, in the evaluation of physical health (Table 2),
            health of the older adults.                        we used ADLs and IADLs as explanatory variables in


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                        91                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.2035
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102